Khoo Eu Shen

Khoo Eu Shen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of full and frank disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Marine Bunker Fuel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Khoo Eu Shen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Khoo Eu Shen has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	Big Port Service DMCC v Owner of Vessel “XIN CHANG SHU”: Leave to Appeal Wrongful Arrest Order(May 2016) Big Port Service DMCC v Xin Chang Shu: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply(Dec 2015) Big Port Service DMCC v China Shipping: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply Dispute(Aug 2015)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	AKN Marine Supplies v PWM Supply: Admiralty Claim for Ship Management Fees(Jun 2016)
Rodyk & Davidson LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	The “URSUS”: Stay of In Personam Proceedings Pending Arbitration(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Khoo Eu Shen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	35.8 parties avg	5.8
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Khoo Eu Shen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(17%)	17%
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Partial	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	5,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AKN Marine Supplies v PWM Supply: Admiralty Claim for Ship Management Fees 22 Jun 2016 The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “PWM Supply” ex “Crest Supply 1” (Defendant)Dismissed	22 Jun 2016	The Owners of the Ship or Vessel “PWM Supply” ex “Crest Supply 1” (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim for damages for conversion, trespass and/or breach of contract was dismissed.
2	Big Port Service DMCC v Owner of Vessel “XIN CHANG SHU”: Leave to Appeal Wrongful Arrest Order 17 May 2016 Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff)Lost	17 May 2016	Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for a declaration that the plaintiff does not require leave of court to appeal against the Wrongful Arrest order was dismissed. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant’s costs which was fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Big Port Service DMCC v Xin Chang Shu: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply 03 Dec 2015 Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	03 Dec 2015	Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal dismissed and ordered to pay costs of $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Big Port Service DMCC v China Shipping: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply Dispute 10 Aug 2015 Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Aug 2015	Big Port Service DMCC (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	The “URSUS”: Stay of In Personam Proceedings Pending Arbitration 05 Apr 2015 The "JANUS" (Defendant)Partial	05 Apr 2015	The "JANUS" (Defendant): Stay of in personam aspects of the SuitsStay of in personam aspects of the Suits. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ong Kim Yeng v Forte Development: Specific Performance & Misrepresentation in Property Sale 23 Oct 2012 Forte Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Oct 2012	Forte Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Originating Summons converted to writ action.