Koh Sim Teck

Koh Sim Teck is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and civil practice. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Leasing Agreements	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koh Sim Teck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koh Sim Teck has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Central Chambers Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake(May 2010) Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City Pte Ltd: Dispute over Share Valuation and Bidding Process(Feb 2009) Orix Capital Ltd v Symrise Holding Pte Ltd: Leasing Dispute & Fraud Allegations(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Sim Teck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.0 parties avg	8.0	67%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Sim Teck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and Mistake 02 May 2010 Yeo Boong Hua (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	02 May 2010	Yeo Boong Hua (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City Pte Ltd: Dispute over Share Valuation and Bidding Process 11 Feb 2009 Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Feb 2009	Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff): Application for stay dismissedPlaintiff's application for a stay of the application was dismissed.
3	Orix Capital Ltd v Symrise Holding Pte Ltd: Leasing Dispute & Fraud Allegations 27 May 2008 Symrise Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 May 2008	Symrise Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Symrise Pte Ltd; Orix's claim is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.