Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City Pte Ltd: Dispute over Share Valuation and Bidding Process
In a dispute between Yeo Boong Hua, Lim Ah Poh, and Teo Tian Seng (plaintiffs) and Turf City Pte Ltd, Singapore Agro Agricultural Pte Ltd, Tan Huat Chye, Ng Chye Samuel, and Koh Khong Meng (defendants), the High Court of Singapore, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, addressed the progression of Originating Summons 1634 of 2002 and Suit 703 of 2004, which had been consolidated and settled by a consent order on 22 February 2006. The plaintiffs sought to set aside the consent order or have a re-valuation of shares, which was disallowed. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a stay and granted the defendant's application to proceed with the bidding process for the shares.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Order granted for the bidding process to proceed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Dispute over share valuation after a consent order. The court ordered the bidding process for the shares to proceed, dismissing the plaintiff's application for a stay.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tan Huat Chye | Defendant | Individual | Application to proceed with bidding process granted | Won | |
Yeo Boong Hua | Plaintiff | Individual | Application for stay dismissed | Lost | |
Lim Ah Poh | Plaintiff | Individual | Application for stay dismissed | Lost | |
Teo Tian Seng | Plaintiff | Individual | Application for stay dismissed | Lost | |
Singapore Agro Agricultural Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Application to proceed with bidding process granted | Won | |
Koh Khong Meng | Defendant | Individual | Application to proceed with bidding process granted | Won | |
Turf City Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Application to proceed with bidding process granted | Won | |
Ng Chye Samuel | Defendant | Individual | Application to proceed with bidding process granted | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants in Originating Summons 1634 of 2002.
- The matter was consolidated with Suit 703 of 2004.
- The parties settled the dispute by a consent order dated 22 February 2006.
- The parties agreed to appoint a valuer to establish the value of the shares.
- The valuation report was delayed and released on 10 August 2007.
- The plaintiff applied to set aside the consent order or a re-valuation of the shares.
- The defendant applied for the consequential order that the bidding process be ordered to proceed.
5. Formal Citations
- Yeo Boong Hua and Others v Turf City Pte Ltd and Others and Another Suit, OS 1634/2002, SUM 4848/2008, 5373/2008, Suit 703/2004, [2009] SGHC 34
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Action commenced by the plaintiffs against the defendants in Originating Summons 1634 of 2002. | |
Consolidated with Suit 703 of 2004. | |
Settled by a consent order. | |
Valuation report due. | |
Valuation report released. | |
Court granted the defendant’s application to proceed with the bidding process for the shares. |
7. Legal Issues
- Setting aside consent order
- Outcome: The court disallowed the application to set aside the consent order.
- Category: Procedural
- Stay of application
- Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a stay.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Setting aside consent order
- Re-valuation of shares
- Stay of application
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Consent order
- Valuation report
- Bidding process
- Shares
- Stay of application
15.2 Keywords
- Civil Procedure
- Share Valuation
- Bidding Process
- Consent Order
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Practice | 75 |
Shares | 50 |
Company Law | 40 |
Commercial Disputes | 30 |
Share Valuation | 25 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Procedure
- Share Valuation
- Bidding Process