Koo Zhi Xuan

Koo Zhi Xuan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in employment law and family law. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and copyrights.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Immunity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Koo Zhi Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Koo Zhi Xuan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	100% of cases	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Copyright, Contractual Terms & Ownership of Lee Kuan Yew's Interview Transcripts(Aug 2017) Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Contractual Terms & Copyright Ownership Dispute(Oct 2016) Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Interpretation of Interview Agreement & Copyright of Lee Kuan Yew's Transcripts(Sep 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koo Zhi Xuan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	52.6 parties avg	2.6	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koo Zhi Xuan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	26,000.00	8,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Copyright, Contractual Terms & Ownership of Lee Kuan Yew's Interview Transcripts 16 Aug 2017 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	16 Aug 2017	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General.
2	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Contractual Terms & Copyright Ownership Dispute 20 Oct 2016 Attorney-General (Defendant)Neutral	20 Oct 2016	Attorney-General (Defendant): NeutralEach party to bear its own costs for Summons No 5810/2015 and the Originating Summons.
3	Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Interpretation of Interview Agreement & Copyright of Lee Kuan Yew's Transcripts 27 Sep 2016 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2016	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application.
4	SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity 20 Apr 2016 THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2016	THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Commissioner's decision was upheld. Costs of $25,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Attorney-General: Claim for Damages for Alleged Biased Judicial Orders Dismissed 04 Sep 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Sep 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded $500 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	AHQ v Attorney-General: Judicial Immunity and Government Liability for Judicial Acts 04 Sep 2014 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Sep 2014	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; AHQ was ordered to pay $500, inclusive of disbursements, forthwith to the Government for the appeal.