Lee Wei Ling v Attorney-General: Interpretation of Interview Agreement & Copyright of Lee Kuan Yew's Transcripts

Lee Wei Ling and Lee Hsien Yang, as executors of Lee Kuan Yew's estate, sought declaratory relief against the Attorney-General regarding the interpretation of an interview agreement pertaining to transcripts of interviews with Lee Kuan Yew. The High Court of Singapore, presided over by Tay Yong Kwang JA, dismissed the plaintiff's application, holding that the estate's copyright was limited and subject to the Official Secrets Act.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The court interpreted an interview agreement concerning Lee Kuan Yew's transcripts, addressing copyright ownership and access rights. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Attorney-GeneralDefendantGovernment AgencyApplication dismissedWon
Hui Choon Kuen of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Koo Zhi Xuan of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Germaine Boey of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Lee Hsien YangPlaintiffIndividualApplication dismissedLost
Lee Wei LingPlaintiffIndividualApplication dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudge of AppealYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Hui Choon KuenAttorney-General’s Chambers
Koo Zhi XuanAttorney-General’s Chambers
Germaine BoeyAttorney-General’s Chambers
Lee Eng BengRajah & Tann LLP
Chew XiangRajah & Tann LLP
Paul TanRajah & Tann LLP

4. Facts

  1. Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) gave tape recordings and transcripts of interviews to the Director, Archives and Oral History Department, and the Secretary to the Cabinet.
  2. The Interview Agreement stipulated conditions for the use and administration of the recordings and transcripts.
  3. LKY retained copyright until 2000 or 5 years after his death, after which it would vest in the Government.
  4. The transcripts were kept in the custody of the Secretary to the Cabinet.
  5. The Attorney-General argued the transcripts were protected by the Official Secrets Act.
  6. The LKY estate sought declaratory relief regarding their rights to the transcripts.
  7. The Government argued that the transcripts were part of a government project and politically sensitive.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lee Wei Ling and another v Attorney-General, , [2016] SGHC 207

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Interviews conducted with Lee Kuan Yew began
Interviews conducted with Lee Kuan Yew ended
Lee Kuan Yew signed the Interview Agreement
Wong Chooi Sen signed the Interview Agreement
Lily Tan signed the Interview Agreement
Lee Kuan Yew passed away
LKY estate became aware of the existence of the Transcripts
Government's letter to the Court
Hearing date
Extended time for any application for leave to appeal against my decision
Originating Summonses No 816 of 2015
Hearing on 14 July 2016
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Interpretation of Contractual Terms
    • Outcome: The court interpreted the Interview Agreement, giving effect to all clauses and avoiding redundancy.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] SGCA 27
  2. Copyright Ownership
    • Outcome: The court held that the LKY estate inherited the copyright to the Transcripts for a limited purpose.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Applicability of the Official Secrets Act
    • Outcome: The court found that the Official Secrets Act applied to the Transcripts.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] SGHC 26

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaratory Relief
  2. Costs of proceedings

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Copyright Infringement

10. Practice Areas

  • Civil Litigation
  • Intellectual Property Law

11. Industries

  • Government
  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Elbow Holdings Pte Ltd v Marina Bay Sands Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2014] SGHC 26SingaporeCited for the interpretation of section 5(1)(e) of the Official Secrets Act regarding documents obtained through a government contract.
Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd v B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte LtdSingapore Court of AppealYes[2008] SGCA 27SingaporeCited for the contextual approach to contractual interpretation.
Lee Kien Meng v Cintamani FrankHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 109SingaporeCited to distinguish between ownership of copyright and ownership of the tangible medium.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Official Secrets Act (Cap 213, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore
Copyright Act (Cap 63, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Interview Agreement
  • Transcripts
  • Copyright
  • Official Secrets Act
  • LKY estate
  • Cabinet Secretary
  • Political sensitivity
  • Two-key system
  • Government project
  • Express written permission

15.2 Keywords

  • contract
  • copyright
  • official secrets act
  • lee kuan yew
  • transcripts
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Copyright Law
  • Government Information
  • Legal Interpretation