KR Manickavasagam

KR Manickavasagam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	KR Manickavasagam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

KR Manickavasagam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Manicka and Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Tee Chu Feng v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal(Oct 2005) Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction & Sentence for Criminal Intimidation, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Theft(Jun 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of KR Manickavasagam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of KR Manickavasagam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tee Chu Feng v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal 03 Oct 2005 Tee Chu Feng (Appellant)Lost	03 Oct 2005	Tee Chu Feng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
2	Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction & Sentence for Criminal Intimidation, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Theft 12 Jun 2005 Gan Sim Lim (Appellant)Lost	12 Jun 2005	Gan Sim Lim (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.