Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction & Sentence for Criminal Intimidation, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Theft

Gan Sim Lim appealed to the High Court of Singapore against the decision of the District Judge, who convicted him on charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft against his ex-girlfriend, Kher Wai Fun. Yong Pung How CJ dismissed the appeal, enhanced the sentence for voluntarily causing hurt from two weeks to three months, and ordered the custodial sentences to run consecutively. The court found Kher to be a credible witness and rejected Gan's version of events.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Sentence on charge of voluntarily causing hurt enhanced to three months’ imprisonment and custodial sentences ordered to run consecutively instead of concurrently.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Gan Sim Lim appeals against his conviction and sentence for criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and theft. The appeal was dismissed and his sentence was enhanced.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Tan Kiat Pheng of Deputy Public Prosecutor
Gan Sim LimAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tan Kiat PhengDeputy Public Prosecutor
KR ManickavasagamManicka and Co

4. Facts

  1. Appellant and complainant were previously in a relationship.
  2. Complainant ended the relationship in October 2004.
  3. Appellant contacted complainant on 14 November 2004 to meet.
  4. Appellant grabbed complainant's handphone and left.
  5. Appellant later returned to complainant's apartment and assaulted her.
  6. Appellant threatened complainant with a pair of scissors.
  7. Complainant sustained injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor, MA 16/2005, [2005] SGHC 107

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Kher ended her relationship with the appellant.
Appellant contacted Kher and asked to meet her.
High Court dismissed the appeal and enhanced the sentence.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Criminal Intimidation
    • Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for criminal intimidation, finding that the appellant uttered threats with the intent to cause alarm.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Voluntarily Causing Hurt
    • Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for voluntarily causing hurt and enhanced the sentence, considering the aggravated nature of the assault.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Theft
    • Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for theft, finding that the appellant dishonestly took the complainant's handphone.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Credibility of Witnesses
    • Outcome: The court affirmed the trial judge's assessment of the complainant as a credible witness and rejected the appellant's version of events.
    • Category: Procedural
  5. Sentencing Principles
    • Outcome: The court reviewed the sentencing principles and determined that the original sentence for voluntarily causing hurt was inadequate, enhancing it to three months.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction
  2. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Criminal Intimidation
  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt
  • Theft

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Tan Koon Swan v PPN/AYes[1986] SLR 126SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court will only interfere with the sentence passed by a lower court under specific circumstances.
Yeo Kwan Wee Kenneth v PPN/AYes[2004] 2 SLR 45SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court will only interfere with the sentence passed by a lower court under specific circumstances.
Farida Begam d/o Mohd Artham v PPN/AYes[2001] 4 SLR 610SingaporeCited for the principles used by trial courts in arriving at a decision on the credibility of a witness.
Yap Giau Beng Terence v PPN/AYes[1998] 3 SLR 656SingaporeCited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to overturn the trial judge’s findings of fact, especially where they hinge on the trial judge’s assessment of the credibility and veracity of witnesses.
Packir Malim v PPN/AYes[1997] 3 SLR 429SingaporeCited to determine the adequacy of the penalty imposed on the appellant for the theft charge.
PP v NN/AYes[1999] 4 SLR 619SingaporeCited to determine the appropriate sentence for the charge of criminal intimidation.
Ramanathan Yogendran v PPN/AYes[1995] 2 SLR 563SingaporeCited to determine the appropriate sentence for the charge of criminal intimidation.
Woon Salvacion Dalayon v PPN/AYes[2003] 1 SLR 129SingaporeCited to determine the appropriate sentence for the charge of criminal intimidation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal CodeSingapore
Penal Code s 506Singapore
Penal Code s 323Singapore
Penal Code s 379Singapore
Penal Code s 378Singapore
Penal Code s 24Singapore
Penal Code s 23Singapore
Penal Code s 503Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Criminal Intimidation
  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt
  • Theft
  • Credibility of Witnesses
  • Sentencing
  • Aggravated Assault
  • Wrongful Loss
  • Dishonestly

15.2 Keywords

  • Criminal Intimidation
  • Voluntarily Causing Hurt
  • Theft
  • Singapore
  • Appeal
  • Sentencing

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals