Kunal Haresh Mirpuri

Kunal Haresh Mirpuri is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and civil practice. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fraud and deceit and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kunal Haresh Mirpuri has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	4 cases	80% of cases	Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and Indemnity Costs(Jan 2022) Symphony Ventures v DNB Bank: Amendment of Pleadings and Limitation Periods in Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, and Conspiracy Claims(Oct 2021) Yong Khong Yoong v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy in Healthstats Investment(Oct 2021)
Incisive Law LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	A Symphony v Sea Justice: Forum Non Conveniens & Retention of Security in Admiralty Collision Case(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kunal Haresh Mirpuri's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	34.4 parties avg	4.4	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kunal Haresh Mirpuri's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	42,000.00	10,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	A Symphony v Sea Justice: Forum Non Conveniens & Retention of Security in Admiralty Collision Case 25 Aug 2024 Owner of the vessel “SEA JUSTICE” (Respondent, Defendant)Won	25 Aug 2024	Owner of the vessel “SEA JUSTICE” (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the stay of action was affirmed and the security was ordered to be returned.
2	Yong Khong Yoong Mark v Ting Choon Meng: Application for Certificate of Three Counsel and Indemnity Costs 11 Jan 2022 Chua Ngak Hwee (Defendant)Won	11 Jan 2022	Chua Ngak Hwee (Defendant): Summons dismissedThe defendants' application was dismissed.
3	Symphony Ventures v DNB Bank: Amendment of Pleadings and Limitation Periods in Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, and Conspiracy Claims 31 Oct 2021 Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	31 Oct 2021	Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Symphony Ventures to pay costs of the appeal to the respondent fixed at $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Yong Khong Yoong v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy in Healthstats Investment 28 Oct 2021 Chua Ngak Hwee (Defendant)Won	28 Oct 2021	Chua Ngak Hwee (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant; costs to be paid by the plaintiffs.
5	Symphony Ventures v DNB Bank: Amendment of Claim, Limitation Act & Fraud 16 Jun 2021 Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jun 2021	Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave to amend Statement of Claim refused in partPlaintiff ordered to pay costs of S$22,000 to the first defendant. Leave to amend was granted for those amendments that were not found to have run foul of the limitation period and which were not objected to by the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.