Lau Wing Yum

Lau Wing Yum is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 34 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	33 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 33 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	29 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 29 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	20 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	18 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	14 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trials	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passports Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Impossible attempt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Admissibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Interference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Group violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing considerations applicable to kleptomaniacs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kleptomania	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hit and Run	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Morbid Jealousy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent to Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences Relating to Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lau Wing Yum has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lau Wing Yum has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 28 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	28 cases	82% of cases	Mohd Noor bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application Dismissed(Oct 2023) Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession(Apr 2023) PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel(Mar 2022)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	15% of cases	Ong Boon Kheng v PP: Securities & Futures Act - Misleading Statements & Criminal Procedure(Nov 2008) Leong Siew Chor v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements and Assessment of Witness Credibility in Murder Conviction Appeal(Oct 2006) G Krishnasamy Naidu v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Abnormality of Mind in Murder Case(Sep 2006)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Culpable Homicide, Theft, Forgery(Jun 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lau Wing Yum's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 3 (9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.2 parties avg	2.2	15%
Partial	52.4 parties avg	2.4	15%
Won	242.3 parties avg	2.3	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2018	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lau Wing Yum's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(15%)	15%
Partial	5(15%)	15%
Won	24(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	50,000.00	50,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 34 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Noor bin Ismail v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application Dismissed 19 Oct 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Oct 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe Criminal Motion filed by the applicant was dismissed.
2	Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession 25 Apr 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	25 Apr 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal allowed in part. Conviction on original charge substituted with a charge of attempted possession.
3	PP v Mohd Noor: Remittal Hearing on Drug Importation & Adequacy of Legal Counsel 28 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction UpheldThe court found that the matters raised by Mohd Noor did not affect his conviction.
4	PP v Kannan: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionKannan was found guilty as charged.
5	Muhammad Nabill v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act & Prosecution's Duty to Disclose Material Witness Statements 30 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	30 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially lostAppeal allowed in part. Conviction for trafficking in diamorphine set aside, substituted with conviction for possession. Conviction for trafficking in cannabis set aside.
6	Han Fang Guan v Public Prosecutor: Impossible Attempt, Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original Conviction OverturnedThe Court of Appeal overturned the original conviction.
7	PP v Imran, Pragas, Tamil: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Jul 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Jul 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused were convicted and sentenced to death.
8	PP v Muhammad Nabill: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing 02 Dec 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Dec 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was convicted on both charges.
9	PP v Khor Chong Seng & Han Fang Guang: Misuse of Drugs Act Importation & Trafficking 04 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of both accusedThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused on charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act.
10	Public Prosecutor v Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Aug 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Aug 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of the accusedThe accused was convicted of drug trafficking.
11	Public Prosecutor v Gunasilan Nadarajah: Trafficking of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 31 Jul 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	31 Jul 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdictThe accused was found guilty.
12	PP v Tan Kay Yong: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Mar 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Mar 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused.
13	Public Prosecutor v Tan Kah Ho and Mui Jia Jun: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Apr 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	06 Apr 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedThe defendants were found guilty on all charges.
14	Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal - Diminished Responsibility, Private Defence 02 Feb 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Feb 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed.
15	PP v Mohamad Noor: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced.
16	Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Jan 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Mohd Suief bin Ismail was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
17	PP v Iskandar bin Rahmat: Murder Conviction for Double Homicide at Hillside Drive 03 Dec 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Dec 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdict on both chargesThe accused was found guilty on both charges of murder under section 300(a) of the Penal Code.
18	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Adverse Inference 10 Mar 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	10 Mar 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed.
19	Public Prosecutor v Purushothaman: Drug Importation under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced.
20	PP v Purushothaman: Importation of Diamorphine & Wilful Blindness 27 Oct 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Oct 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution successfully proved its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
21	Public Prosecutor v Vitria Depsi Wahyuni: Culpable Homicide, Domestic Worker Violence 06 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced.
22	Public Prosecutor v Rosli bin Yassin: Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Culpable Homicide, Theft, Forgery 24 Jun 2012 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jun 2012	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of 12 years’ preventive detention imposedThe accused was sentenced to 12 years’ preventive detention.
23	PP v Firdaus bin Abdullah: Child Abuse, Grievous Hurt, and Sentencing 16 Mar 2010 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	16 Mar 2010	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with the sentences adjusted.
24	Luong Thi Trang Hoang Kathleen v PP: Misuse of Foreign Travel Document & Sentencing 04 Nov 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	04 Nov 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe appeal was allowed in part, and the original sentence was reduced.
25	Public Prosecutor v Ng Guan Hup: Withdrawal of Charge and Discharge Application 23 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	23 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal against the decision of the district judge was allowed.
26	Public Prosecutor v Leong Soon Kheong: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide in Group Violence Case 28 Jun 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	28 Jun 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was increased.
27	Ong Boon Kheng v PP: Securities & Futures Act - Misleading Statements & Criminal Procedure 06 Nov 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Nov 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application to reserve questions of law.
28	Mohammed Ali v PP: Murder Appeal Dismissed - Provocation, Causation, Judicial Conduct 25 Sep 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Sep 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed.
29	PP v Goh Lee Yin: Kleptomania, Theft, and Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders 28 Nov 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the District Court's sentence was dismissed.
30	Public Prosecutor v Lee Meng Soon: Drink Driving & Failure to Render Assistance Sentencing 13 Aug 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	13 Aug 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with the sentence for drink driving increased.
31	Leong Siew Chor v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements and Assessment of Witness Credibility in Murder Conviction Appeal 05 Oct 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Oct 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
32	G Krishnasamy Naidu v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Abnormality of Mind in Murder Case 20 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	20 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the original conviction was overturned.
33	PP v Leong Siew Chor: Murder, Consent to Death & Admissibility of Statements 18 May 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 May 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.
34	Abul Khabir Uddin Tohron Nisa v Public Prosecutor: Bail Reduction Application under Employment of Foreign Workers Act 30 Mar 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	30 Mar 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Bail ReducedBail reduced from $100,000 to $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).