Lee Hui Min

Lee Hui Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Hui Min has demonstrated expertise across 61 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Syariah	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyeuristic Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
State land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt in the face of the court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stamp duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banker's Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Hui Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Hui Min has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	50% of cases	Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis: Admission to the Bar, Sexual Offences, Public Trust(Oct 2024) Attorney-General v Ravi s/o Madasamy: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Misconduct(Jul 2022) Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Election During COVID-19 Pandemic(Jun 2020)
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	5 cases	42% of cases	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute(Dec 2016) Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok: Dispute Over Clan Association Membership and Election Validity(Oct 2016) Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute(Oct 2015)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Interlocutory Injunction on Banker's Guarantee & Exclusion Clauses(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Hui Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 4 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	8%
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	33.6 parties avg	3.6	25%
Won	63.3 parties avg	3.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Hui Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	2(17%)	17%
Partial	3(25%)	25%
Won	6(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	941,893.05	941,893.051 cases	1
HKD	4,043,424.75	4,043,424.751 cases	1
SGD	80,000.00	26,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Mohamad Shafee Khamis: Admission to the Bar, Sexual Offences, Public Trust 27 Oct 2024 Attorney-General (Respondent)Partial	27 Oct 2024	Attorney-General (Respondent): Objection partially successfulThe Attorney-General objected to the admission, and the court imposed a Minimum Exclusionary Period, though shorter than the requested four years.
2	Attorney-General v Ravi s/o Madasamy: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Misconduct 27 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Attorney-General's application for review of the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision was dismissed.
3	Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Election During COVID-19 Pandemic 29 Jun 2020 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2020	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Attorney-General was dismissed.
4	Fauziyah v Singapore Land Authority: Striking Out, Appeal, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Compulsory Acquisition, Interest in Land, State Land, Muslim Law, Charitable Trusts 16 Jun 2020 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	16 Jun 2020	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe assistant registrar’s decision to strike out the Acquisition Challenge Claim is upheld.
5	Ong Wui Teck v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court for Scandalising the Court and Contempt in the Face of the Court 23 Mar 2020 The Attorney-General (Respondent, Applicant)Won	23 Mar 2020	The Attorney-General (Respondent, Applicant): Appeals dismissedThe Attorney-General successfully defended the High Court's decision finding Ong Wui Teck guilty of contempt of court.
6	Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of ABSD Remission Decision 23 Mar 2020 The Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2020	The Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCosts of $50,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Interlocutory Injunction on Banker's Guarantee & Exclusion Clauses 02 Sep 2018 Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2018	Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Plaintiff): Injunction dischargedThe court discharged the interim injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from paying out on a banker’s guarantee issued in favour of the 1st defendant and to prevent the 1st defendant from receiving payment of the same.
8	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute 18 Dec 2016 Ding Pei Zhen (Respondent)Partial	18 Dec 2016	Ding Pei Zhen (Respondent): Judgment variedThe amount awarded to the respondent was varied to €941,893.05 less HK$6,389,910.21.
9	Tan Boon Hai v Tan Kia Kok: Dispute Over Clan Association Membership and Election Validity 27 Oct 2016 The Hainan Tan Clan Association (Defendant)Won	27 Oct 2016	The Hainan Tan Clan Association (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Plaintiff ordered to pay the Clan costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Tanaka Lumber v Datuk Tufail: Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy in Timber Trading Dispute 22 Oct 2015 Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant)Dismissed	22 Oct 2015	Datuk Haji Mohammad Tufail bin Mahmud (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDatuk Tufail's counterclaim was dismissed because he failed to discharge his burden of proof.
11	Tan Bee Hoon v Quek Hung Heong: Sale of Property, Proprietary Estoppel & Abuse of Process 30 Aug 2015 Tan Bee Hoon (executrix for the estate of Heng Sai Kee, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Aug 2015	Tan Bee Hoon (executrix for the estate of Heng Sai Kee, deceased) (Plaintiff): Application for sale in lieu of partition grantedPlaintiffs' application for sale in lieu of partition granted.
12	ANZ Bank v De Saram: Summary Judgment Appeal on Loan Agreements & Counterclaim 26 Nov 2014 Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2014	Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Summary Judgment UpheldSummary judgment against the Borrower for HK$4,043,424.75 (Hong Kong Dollar).