Lee Sien Liang Joseph

Lee Sien Liang Joseph is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and undue influence. Their track record shows a 28.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 15 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated expertise across 133 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	21 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	10 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Counter-restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Incomplete Gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence on appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policy Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unilateral Pricing Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reconciliation Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Misuse Counterclaim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cause of action estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Calderbank Offer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sponsorship Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss Principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Sien Liang Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Sien Liang Joseph has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 26 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LVM Law Chambers LLC	26 cases	87% of cases	Re Dasin Retail Trust: Moratorium for Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA(Jan 2025) Phoa v Kasenda: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Standing, Personal Representatives(Jan 2024) Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties(Jan 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson	2 cases	7% of cases	Choy Kuo Wen Eddie v Soh Chin Seng: Motorcycle Accident, Tort, and Damages Assessment(Jul 2008) Sun Technosystems v Federal Express: Bailment, Carrier Duties & Hijacking(Nov 2006)
LVM Law Chambers	1 cases	3% of cases	PP v Lin Haifeng: Corruption & Falsification by Senior Project Manager in COCC Project(Jun 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Singapore Tourism Board v Children’s Media Ltd: Quistclose Trust & Sponsorship Sum Refund(Aug 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Sien Liang Joseph's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 15 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	112.0 parties avg	12.0	3%
Lost	135.2 parties avg	5.2	43%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	3%
Partial	74.9 parties avg	4.9	23%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Won	95.8 parties avg	5.8	30%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	25.7 parties avg	5.7
2019	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	104.7 parties avg	4.7
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	53.3 parties avg	3.3
2024	38.9 parties avg	8.9
2025	111.0 parties avg	11.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Sien Liang Joseph's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	13(41%)	41%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	7(22%)	22%
Withdrawn	1(3%)	3%
Won	9(28%)	28%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,800,092.07	458,828.9517 cases	17

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	11 5114	Lost: 5 cases (45.5%) Neutral: 1 cases (9.1%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 4 cases (36.4%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 3 cases (60.0%)
2024	4 1111	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 30 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Dasin Retail Trust: Moratorium for Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA 12 Jan 2025 Bounty Way Investments Limited (Other)Lost	12 Jan 2025	Bounty Way Investments Limited (Other): Objection DismissedObjection to the moratorium application was dismissed.
2	PP v Lin Haifeng: Corruption & Falsification by Senior Project Manager in COCC Project 30 Jun 2024 Lin Haifeng (Respondent)Lost	30 Jun 2024	Lin Haifeng (Respondent): ConvictedThe Accused was convicted of nine charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and nine charges under the Penal Code, sentenced to 21 weeks' imprisonment and a fine of $9,000 (SGD), with an in-default sentence of nine weeks' imprisonment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Phoa v Kasenda: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Standing, Personal Representatives 22 Jan 2024 Joshua Huang Thien En (Defendant)Won	22 Jan 2024	Joshua Huang Thien En (Defendant): Applications UpheldThe defendants successfully opposed all three applications made by the plaintiff.
4	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties 17 Jan 2024 JG Jewelry Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Dismissed	17 Jan 2024	JG Jewelry Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Counterclaims dismissedJG Jewelry Pte Ltd's counterclaims are dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd v Debtor: Assignment, Set-Off & Insolvency 23 Nov 2023 Debtor (Respondent)Partial	23 Nov 2023	Debtor (Respondent): Insolvency set-off allowedInsolvency set-off did take effect immediately prior to the commencement of the winding up of the Company on 12 July 2021.
6	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Appeal on Costs Decision and Requirements for Permission to Appeal 16 Nov 2023 Chan Pik Sun (Applicant)Partial	16 Nov 2023	Chan Pik Sun (Applicant): Permission to appeal the Costs Decision grantedThe court granted the applicant permission to appeal the Costs Decision.
7	CYE v CYF: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Energy Trading Dispute 28 Sep 2023 CYE (Claimant)Lost	28 Sep 2023	CYE (Claimant): Application DismissedClaimant's application to set aside the Final Award is dismissed.
8	WDT v WDS: Appeal on Incomplete Gift & Admissibility of Fresh Evidence 05 Feb 2023 WDT (Appellant, Defendant, Applicant)Lost	05 Feb 2023	WDT (Appellant, Defendant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $25,000, inclusive of disbursements, awarded to the respondent.
9	Terigi v Hook: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer, and Employment Agreement Dispute 25 Jan 2023 Incomlend Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	25 Jan 2023	Incomlend Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Mr. Hook breached the 1st Shareholders’ Deed. Awarded S$30,000 inclusive of disbursements in costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Oni Global Pte Ltd v Wong Yong Kai: Conspiracy Claim & Service Out of Jurisdiction 08 Jun 2022 Oni Global Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	08 Jun 2022	Oni Global Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the decision to set aside the leave to serve out of jurisdiction was dismissed.
11	Oxley Consortium v Geetex Enterprises: Interpretation of Standard Form Contract under Sale of Commercial Properties Act 27 Jul 2021 Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	27 Jul 2021	Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part; the court answered the first four questions of law in favor of the respondent. The respondent is entitled to a refund of progress payments for Unit 1 and Unit 2 as claimed in the schedule to the award, together with the prescribed interest.
12	Terrence Fernandez v Genevieve Lim: Defamation, Conspiracy, and Harassment Suit 29 Dec 2020 Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party)Withdrawn	29 Dec 2020	Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party): Claim WithdrawnThe claim and counterclaim against Goh Juak Kin were discontinued.
13	UWF v UWH: Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in Will Dispute 21 Dec 2020 UWG (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Dec 2020	UWG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed.
14	MS First Capital Insurance v Smart Automobile: Breach of Contract & Contractual Terms Dispute 19 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	19 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared that the sum of S$500,000 paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in September 2013 was paid towards the Burning Cost Premium under the Policy, and that the defendant is accordingly not entitled to any refund of that amount. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Silverlink Resorts v MS First Capital: Scope of Arbitration Agreement & Stay of Proceedings 15 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal seeking a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The court ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs of the appeal fixed at $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed by me if not agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
16	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v J. G. Jewelry: Summary Judgment & Joint Venture Dispute 21 Jul 2020 J. G. Jewelry Pte. Ltd. (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Won	21 Jul 2020	J. G. Jewelry Pte. Ltd. (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Unconditional leave to defend grantedDefendant was granted unconditional leave to defend against the plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Mareva Injunction in Investment Scheme Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Jul 2020	Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for a Mareva injunction was dismissed.
18	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Res Judicata & Striking Out in Construction Dispute 28 Jun 2020 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jun 2020	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims in conspiracy struck outPlaintiff's claims in conspiracy against the first defendant are struck out in their totality.
19	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Appeal on Arbitral Award under Arbitration Act 26 Apr 2020 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2020	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedCKR's application for leave to appeal the arbitral award was dismissed.
20	LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 02 Apr 2020 Chan Pik Sun (Other)Neutral	02 Apr 2020	Chan Pik Sun (Other): NeutralThe outcome for Ms. Chan is neutral in this appeal, as the court allowed her lawyers to continue representing her. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Liberty Sky Investments v Aesthetic Medical Partners: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission 09 Feb 2020 Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Feb 2020	Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Share Purchase Agreements 04 Dec 2019 Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	04 Dec 2019	Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedThe counterclaim by the defendants against Wang is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Wan Hoe Keet v LVM Law Chambers LLC: Conflict of Interest and Injunction in Legal Representation 22 Apr 2019 LVM Law Chambers LLC (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2019	LVM Law Chambers LLC (Respondent): Injunction grantedLVM Law Chambers LLC was enjoined from acting for Chan Pik Sun in Suit 806.
24	OCBC v. Yeo Hui Keng: Non Est Factum & All-Moneys Mortgage Dispute 27 Feb 2019 Tan Peng Chin LLC (Third Party)Won	27 Feb 2019	Tan Peng Chin LLC (Third Party): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim against the Third Party was dismissed.
25	Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh: Undue Influence, Estate Assets, and Interim Injunction 17 Jun 2018 Sia Tze Ming (Non-party)Won	17 Jun 2018	Sia Tze Ming (Non-party): Intervention AllowedMs. Sia was permitted to intervene in the action for the restricted purposes of dealing with the interim injunction application, any application to vary or discharge the interim injunction, as well as any appeal arising from the interim injunction application or the application to intervene.
26	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 LIU CHENG CHAN (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant)Partial	16 Jan 2018	LIU CHENG CHAN (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims 24 Apr 2017 CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2017	CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant): LostLiable for 90% of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting to $540,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Singapore Tourism Board v Children’s Media Ltd: Quistclose Trust & Sponsorship Sum Refund 12 Aug 2010 Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	12 Aug 2010	Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $6,661,092.07, including sponsorship sums, wasted man-hour costs, and other payments. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Choy Kuo Wen Eddie v Soh Chin Seng: Motorcycle Accident, Tort, and Damages Assessment 07 Jul 2008 Soh Chin Seng (Defendant)Partial	07 Jul 2008	Soh Chin Seng (Defendant): Partial LiabilityConsent interlocutory judgment was entered at 20% liability for the Defendant, with the Plaintiff to pay costs from date of Writ to 24 September 2007, and the Defendant to pay costs from 24 September 2007 onwards. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Sun Technosystems v Federal Express: Bailment, Carrier Duties & Hijacking 07 Nov 2006 Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2006	Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.