Terrence Fernandez v Genevieve Lim: Defamation, Conspiracy, and Harassment Suit
In Terrence Fernandez v Genevieve Lim Shao Ying and Goh Juak Kin, the High Court of Singapore heard a case involving claims of defamation, conspiracy to injure by defamation, and harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act. The plaintiff, Terrence Fernandez, sued Genevieve Lim Shao Ying and Goh Juak Kin, arising from a work complaint filed by Lim against Fernandez. The court dismissed all of Fernandez's claims, finding no basis for defamation, conspiracy, or harassment.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
All claims dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Defamation suit involving a work complaint. The court dismissed the defamation, conspiracy, and harassment claims.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terrence Fernandez | Plaintiff | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
Genevieve Lim Shao Ying | Defendant | Individual | Judgment for Defendant | Won | |
Goh Juak Kin | Defendant | Individual | Judgment for Defendant | Won | |
Serangoon Gardens Country Club | Third Party | Association | Claim Withdrawn | Withdrawn |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Valerie Thean | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Genevieve Lim filed a work complaint against Terrence Fernandez.
- Terrence Fernandez sued Genevieve Lim for defamation, conspiracy, and harassment.
- The complaint arose from Lim's employment with Serangoon Gardens Country Club.
- Fernandez was the President of the Club.
- Lim complained of Fernandez’s allegedly “insulting, threatening remarks and comments against [her]”.
- The Disciplinary Committee dismissed the charges against Terrence Fernandez.
- The Club’s Constitution vests the General Committee with the responsibility of disciplining office bearers.
5. Formal Citations
- Terrence Fernandez v Lim Shao Ying Genevieve and another, Suit No 194 of 2019, [2020] SGHC 278
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Goh Juak Kin joined the Serangoon Gardens Country Club as General Manager. | |
Terrence Fernandez became Chairman of the Club’s Membership Relations Department Sub-Committee. | |
Genevieve Lim joined the Serangoon Gardens Country Club as Membership Relations Manager. | |
Genevieve Lim communicated her worries to Terrence Fernandez. | |
Genevieve Lim wrote a formal letter of complaint about Terrence Fernandez. | |
Roles of the General Committee and management clarified at a General Committee Meeting. | |
Mediation Session held between Terrence Fernandez and Genevieve Lim. | |
Alfred Wong visited the Serangoon Gardens Country Club. | |
Terrence Fernandez sent an email to Goh Juak Kin regarding the complaint against Genevieve Lim. | |
Goh Juak Kin met with Alfred Wong to resolve the complaint. | |
Terrence Fernandez proposed a meeting with Randy Sng to discuss the Service Quality. | |
Genevieve Lim filed a formal complaint against Terrence Fernandez. | |
Randy Sng sent the Complaint to Terrence Fernandez. | |
Terrence Fernandez wrote to ask for specific information of workplace harassment and victimisation. | |
Terrence Fernandez sent a further email expressing a willingness to meet. | |
The Exco met without Terrence Fernandez. | |
Terrence Fernandez was removed as Membership Relations Department Chairman. | |
A disciplinary committee took over investigations. | |
The disciplinary committee requested Goh Juak Kin for a list of all conduct that Genevieve Lim was relying upon. | |
The disciplinary committee requested Goh Juak Kin for a list of all conduct that Genevieve Lim was relying upon. | |
The disciplinary committee requested Goh Juak Kin for a list of all conduct that Genevieve Lim was relying upon. | |
Terrence Fernandez was served with formal charges. | |
Terrence Fernandez was elected president of the Club. | |
Goh Juak Kin and Linda Loke resigned. | |
Genevieve Lim resigned. | |
The charges were dismissed by the new disciplinary committee. | |
Terrence Fernandez filed this suit against the defendants. | |
Trial began. | |
Trial continued. | |
Plaintiff’s Closing Submissions dated. | |
Judgment reserved. |
7. Legal Issues
- Defamation
- Outcome: The court found that the elements of defamation were not made out and the claim was dismissed.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to properly plead defamatory statement
- Related Cases:
- [2015] 2 SLR 751
- Conspiracy
- Outcome: The court dismissed the conspiracy claim, finding no evidence of collusion and no predominant intention to injure the plaintiff.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2013] SGCA 47
- Harassment
- Outcome: The court dismissed the harassment claim, finding that the conduct was reasonable.
- Category: Substantive
- Negligence
- Outcome: The court found no evidence of negligence on the part of Mr. Goh and dismissed the claim.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2007] 4 SLR(R) 100
8. Remedies Sought
- Damages for Defamation
- Damages for Conspiracy to Injure
- Damages for Harassment
- Damages for Negligence
9. Cause of Actions
- Defamation
- Conspiracy to Injure
- Harassment
- Negligence
10. Practice Areas
- Litigation
11. Industries
- Social Club
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Golden Season Pte Ltd and others v Kairos Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd and another | High Court | Yes | [2015] 2 SLR 751 | Singapore | Cited for the elements of defamation. |
Lait v Evening Standard Ltd | N/A | Yes | [2011] 1 WLR 2973 | N/A | Cited regarding subtle distinctions in defamation suits. |
DDSA Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd and another | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [1972] 3 All ER 417 | England | Cited for guidance on addressing defective pleadings in defamation cases. |
Chan Cheng Wah Bernard and others v Koh Sin Chong Freddie and another appeal | High Court | Yes | [2012] 1 SLR 506 | Singapore | Cited for the meaning of impugned statement in defamation. |
Segar Ashok v Koh Fonn Lyn Veronica and another suit | High Court | Yes | [2010] SGHC 168 | Singapore | Cited regarding scepticism towards words uttered by someone's enemy. |
Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security Co-operative Ltd and others | High Court | Yes | [2010] 3 SLR 110 | Singapore | Cited for the definition of malice. |
D v Kong Sim Guan | N/A | Yes | [2003] 3 SLR(R) 146 | Singapore | Cited as an example of a statement-maker protecting his/her self-interest, with the recipient having a corresponding interest in receiving such information. |
Low Tuck Kwong v Sukamto Sia | High Court | Yes | [2014] 1 SLR 639 | Singapore | Cited for the purpose of the defence of qualified privilege. |
Huntley v Ward | N/A | Yes | (1859) 141 ER 557 | N/A | Cited for the latitude afforded to those who fall under the protection of qualified privilege. |
Smith v Streatfeild and others | N/A | Yes | [1913] 3 KB 764 | N/A | Cited for the principle upon which the law of qualified privilege rests. |
Review Publishing Co Ltd and another v Lee Hsien Loong and another appeal | High Court | Yes | [2010] 1 SLR 52 | Singapore | Cited for the rule in Slim regarding defamatory meaning. |
Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd v HD Holdings Pte Ltd and others and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] SGCA 47 | Singapore | Cited for the elements of lawful and unlawful means conspiracy. |
Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency | High Court | Yes | [2007] 4 SLR(R) 100 | Singapore | Cited regarding the duty of care. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Protection from Harassment Act (Cap 256A, 2015 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Defamation
- Conspiracy
- Harassment
- Qualified Privilege
- Justification
- Workplace Complaint
- General Committee
- Disciplinary Committee
- Malice
- Negligence
15.2 Keywords
- defamation
- conspiracy
- harassment
- workplace
- complaint
- Singapore
- High Court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Defamation | 90 |
Torts | 80 |
Harassment | 70 |
Statutory offences | 60 |
Criminal conspiracy | 50 |
Criminal Law | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Defamation Law
- Tort Law
- Harassment Law
- Conspiracy Law
- Employment Law