Lee Teck Leng

Lee Teck Leng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	11 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	11 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carnal Intercourse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gross Indecency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Paedophilia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alibi	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Labor and Employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Teck Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Teck Leng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee Associates	5 cases	42% of cases	ADF v Public Prosecutor: Maid Abuse, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Sentencing(Nov 2009) PP v Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence: Maid Abuse Case - Conviction and Sentencing Appeal(Feb 2009) Public Prosecutor v Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence: Conviction for Maid Abuse under the Penal Code(Oct 2008)
Tan Peng Chin & Partners	5 cases	42% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Yeoh Aik Wei: Drug Importation - Woodlands Checkpoint(Sep 2002) TS Video v Lim Chee Yong: Copyright Infringement, Discharge Not Amounting to Acquittal(Nov 2001) Goh Chye Soon Jimmy v PP: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Possession of Controlled Drugs(Apr 2001)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	2 cases	17% of cases	PP v Lim Beng Cheok: Sentencing for Carnal Intercourse and Gross Indecency with Male Students(Mar 2003) Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking(Jan 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Teck Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.3 parties avg	2.3	92%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Teck Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(92%)	92%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	1,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ADF v Public Prosecutor: Maid Abuse, Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Sentencing 30 Nov 2009 ADF (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	30 Nov 2009	ADF (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal against convictions dismissedADF's appeal against his convictions on the tenth, 12th and 13th charges was dismissed.
2	PP v Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence: Maid Abuse Case - Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 04 Feb 2009 Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence (Accused)Lost	04 Feb 2009	Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence (Accused): Convicted on five chargesThe accused was convicted on five charges of causing simple hurt to a domestic maid and sentenced to imprisonment.
3	Public Prosecutor v Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence: Conviction for Maid Abuse under the Penal Code 07 Oct 2008 Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2008	Lim Hwang Ngin Lawrence (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction on three charges was dismissed.
4	PP v Tan Ping Koon & Chua Ser Lien: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing 08 Sep 2004 Chua Ser Lien (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2004	Chua Ser Lien (Defendant): Imprisonment for life and caningSentenced to imprisonment for life and three strokes of the cane.
5	Choy Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Maid under Penal Code 15 Jul 2003 Choy Kok Meng (Appellant)Lost	15 Jul 2003	Choy Kok Meng (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
6	PP v Lim Beng Cheok: Sentencing for Carnal Intercourse and Gross Indecency with Male Students 12 Mar 2003 Lim Beng Cheok (Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2003	Lim Beng Cheok (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedSentenced to 18 years imprisonment for offences under sections 377 and 377A of the Penal Code.
7	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking 21 Jan 2003 Moorthy a/l Angappan (Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2003	Moorthy a/l Angappan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMoorthy's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
8	Public Prosecutor v. Yeoh Aik Wei: Drug Importation - Woodlands Checkpoint 23 Sep 2002 Yeoh Aik Wei (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2002	Yeoh Aik Wei (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to deathThe accused was convicted of importing diamorphine and sentenced to death.
9	TS Video v Lim Chee Yong: Copyright Infringement, Discharge Not Amounting to Acquittal 18 Nov 2001 Lim Chee Yong (Respondent)Won	18 Nov 2001	Lim Chee Yong (Respondent): Discharge Not Amounting to Acquittal UpheldThe court upheld the decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal.
10	Goh Chye Soon Jimmy v PP: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Possession of Controlled Drugs 22 Apr 2001 Goh Chye Soon Jimmy (Appellant)Lost	22 Apr 2001	Goh Chye Soon Jimmy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Ryan v Exploration Png: S216 Companies Act Application for Company Conduct Directions 19 Nov 2000 Rosaline Berger (Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2000	Rosaline Berger (Respondent): LostApplication allowed against the 2nd Defendant. Costs in respect of prayers 1 to 3 of the application and SIC No.602597 of 2000 be paid by the 2nd Defendant and fixed at $2,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Public Prosecutor v Lee Chin Seah: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Feb 2000 Lee Chin Seah (Defendant)Lost	07 Feb 2000	Lee Chin Seah (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty as charged and sentenced according to the law.