Choy Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt to Maid under Penal Code
Choy Kok Meng appealed to the High Court of Singapore against his conviction in the magistrate's court on five charges of voluntarily causing hurt to his maid, Makanah. The High Court, presided over by Yong Pung How CJ, dismissed the appeal, finding Makanah's testimony credible and supported by medical evidence. The court held that the magistrate was correct in his conclusion and upheld the conviction on all five charges.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Choy Kok Meng appeals conviction for voluntarily causing hurt to his maid. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding the maid's testimony credible and supported by medical evidence.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Conviction upheld | Won | Eddy Tham of Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Choy Kok Meng | Appellant | Individual | Appeal dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Yong Pung How | Chief Justice | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Eddy Tham | Deputy Public Prosecutor |
Lee Teck Leng | Lee Associates |
4. Facts
- Choy was convicted of five charges of voluntarily causing hurt to his maid, Makanah.
- The charges related to incidents that happened on 6 August 2001 at Choy’s house and office.
- Makanah testified to being kicked, pushed, and punched by Choy.
- Choy's defense was alibi for the house incidents and bare denial for the office incidents.
- The magistrate found Makanah to be a truthful witness and rejected the defense's contention that she had inflicted the injuries on herself.
- Dr. Quek's medical examination found bruises on Makanah’s left jaw and the back of her right thigh.
- Photographs revealed bruises on Makanah’s left calf and back.
5. Formal Citations
- Choy Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor, MA 269/2002, [2003] SGHC 150
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Incidents of voluntarily causing hurt to Makanah occurred. | |
Makanah interviewed by Sgt Kamaruzaman. | |
Makanah examined by Dr. Quek. | |
Case Number MA 269/2002 assigned. | |
High Court dismissed the appeal. |
7. Legal Issues
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
- Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for voluntarily causing hurt.
- Category: Substantive
- Weight of Evidence
- Outcome: The court found that the evidence supported a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Category: Procedural
- Credibility of Witness
- Outcome: The court found the complainant to be a truthful witness.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Appeal against conviction
9. Cause of Actions
- Voluntarily Causing Hurt
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Appeals
11. Industries
- Domestic Service
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R v Lucas (Ruth) | N/A | Yes | [1981] QB 720 | N/A | Cited for guidelines on corroborative evidence against the accused. |
PP v Yeo Choon Poh | N/A | Yes | [1994] 2 SLR 86 | Singapore | Applied guidelines enunciated in R v Lucas regarding corroborative evidence. |
Lim Ah Poh v PP | N/A | Yes | [1992] 1 SLR 713 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to disturb a lower court’s findings of fact. |
PP v Azman bin Abdullah | N/A | Yes | [1998] 2 SLR 704 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to disturb a lower court’s findings of fact. |
Yap Giau Beng Terence v PP | N/A | Yes | [1998] 3 SLR 656 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that an appellate court should be slow to disturb a lower court’s findings of fact, especially where it hinged on the trial judge’s assessment of the credibility and veracity of the witness. |
Kwan Peng Hong v PP | N/A | Yes | [2000] 4 SLR 96 | Singapore | Cited for the approach to be taken where a conviction is to be based solely on the word of the complainant. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code (Cap 224) s 323 read with s 73(2) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Voluntarily causing hurt
- Maid
- Corroborative evidence
- Credibility of witness
- Medical examination
- Alibi
- Reasonable doubt
15.2 Keywords
- Voluntarily causing hurt
- maid
- criminal law
- evidence
- appeal
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Evidence Law | 80 |
Criminal Law | 75 |
Criminal Procedure | 60 |
Domestic Helper Abuse | 50 |
Personal Injury | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Evidence
- Assault