Lem Jit Min Andy

Lem Jit Min Andy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in warranties and equitable recoupment. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 46% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Warranties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Recoupment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustees Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lem Jit Min Andy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lem Jit Min Andy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	6 cases	46% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution(Aug 2024) Ong Han Nam v Borneo Ventures: Damages Assessment for Breach of Land Warranty(Aug 2023) Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order for Inability to Pay Debts(Sep 2022)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	5 cases	38% of cases	Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Breach of Contract & Warranties Dispute over Sutera Harbour Resort Land(May 2020) CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration(Mar 2020) British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim: Construction of Settlement for Income Distribution(Nov 2019)
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	15% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute(Sep 2022) Sum Yue Holdings v Foo Sek Soon: Conspiracy, Breach of Director/Employee Duties, Transfer of Project(Jun 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lem Jit Min Andy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 6 (46%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	75.9 parties avg	5.9	54%
Partial	36.3 parties avg	6.3	23%
Won	37.0 parties avg	7.0	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	37.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lem Jit Min Andy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(54%)	54%
Partial	3(23%)	23%
Won	3(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	1,830,376.00	1,830,376.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution 07 Aug 2024 Shawqi Ali Salem Taleb (Respondent)Lost	07 Aug 2024	Shawqi Ali Salem Taleb (Respondent): Application OpposedApplication opposed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ong Han Nam v Borneo Ventures: Damages Assessment for Breach of Land Warranty 29 Aug 2023 Ong Han Nam (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	29 Aug 2023	Ong Han Nam (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partDamages reassessed and reduced to RM 1,830,376 with interest at 5.33% from 26 March 2014. Assumed MYR, as the underlying land is located in Malaysia.
3	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute 29 Sep 2022 Shawqi Ali Salem Talib (Respondent)Partial	29 Sep 2022	Shawqi Ali Salem Talib (Respondent): Application allowed in partThe court allowed the summons only in part, in that it made an order allowing the Group 1 Respondents to act as representatives of the 15 beneficiaries who have provided their express written consent to have their interests represented by the Group 1 Respondents.
4	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order for Inability to Pay Debts 19 Sep 2022 Song Jianbo (Claimant)Won	19 Sep 2022	Song Jianbo (Claimant): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted in favour of the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
5	Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure 25 May 2022 Song Jianbo (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2022	Song Jianbo (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication to maintain the writ of seizure and sale was dismissed, with costs awarded to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Nishiki Holdings v Sankaty: Conflict of Interest, Loan Agreements & Valuation 19 Dec 2021 Sankaty European Investments S.A.R.L (Defendant)Lost	19 Dec 2021	Sankaty European Investments S.A.R.L (Defendant): Appointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set asideAppointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set aside. The appointment of the Receivers is consequently invalid and void.
7	Ong Han Nam v Borneo Ventures: Breach of Contract, Warranties & Res Judicata 07 Mar 2021 Ong Han Nam (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	07 Mar 2021	Ong Han Nam (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partThe court found a breach of the Land Warranty but reversed the lower court's decision regarding the Asset Disposal and Arm's Length Warranties. Injunctions were reversed, and damages were ordered to be assessed.
8	Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Breach of Contract & Warranties Dispute over Sutera Harbour Resort Land 04 May 2020 Ong Han Nam (Defendant)Lost	04 May 2020	Ong Han Nam (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiff is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment was delivered in Singapore.
9	CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration 23 Mar 2020 International Air Transport Association (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2020	International Air Transport Association (Respondent): Tribunal's Jurisdiction AffirmedThe court declared that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claims of IATA in the arbitration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim: Construction of Settlement for Income Distribution 19 Nov 2019 Saadaldeen Ali Salim Talib (Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2019	Saadaldeen Ali Salim Talib (Respondent): Arguments rejectedThe court rejected the pari passu interpretation, which was advocated by this respondent.
11	Public Prosecutor v BDA: Rape, Outrage of Modesty - Son Accused of Sexually Assaulting Mother 27 Mar 2018 BDA (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2018	BDA (Defendant): ConvictionThe Accused was convicted of rape and outrage of modesty and sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane.
12	Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Stay of Proceedings & Breach of Warranty 14 Dec 2017 Ong Han Nam (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Dec 2017	Ong Han Nam (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs below were reversed to be costs in the cause and not in favor of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Sum Yue Holdings v Foo Sek Soon: Conspiracy, Breach of Director/Employee Duties, Transfer of Project 28 Jun 2010 Bob Lim (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2010	Bob Lim (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.