British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim: Construction of Settlement for Income Distribution

In British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim bin Talib and others, the High Court of Singapore, on 20 November 2019, addressed an originating summons regarding the construction of a settlement established by Mr. Shaik Sallim bin Mohamed bin Sallim bin Talib. The core legal issue was determining the proper distribution of net income from the settlement after the death of a beneficiary, Shafeeq bin Salim Talib, who passed away without offspring. The applicant, British and Malayan Trustees Limited, sought direction on whether Shafeeq's share should be divided among all surviving income beneficiaries (pari passu interpretation) or only among those beneficiaries whose shares derived from the same child of the Settlor, Aisha (branch interpretation). The court preferred the branch interpretation, ruling that Shafeeq's share should accrue to his siblings, who are the surviving issue of Aisha.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Branch interpretation preferred; Shafeeq's share accrues to his siblings within Aisha's portion.

1.3 Case Type

Others (Succession and Wills)

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court addressed the construction of a settlement to determine how income should be distributed among beneficiaries after one passes without offspring.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
British and Malayan Trustees LimitedApplicantCorporationApplication partially successfulPartialMak Wei Munn, Ong Hui Fen, Rachel
Lutfi Salim bin TalibRespondentIndividualArguments upheldWonDaryl Ong Hock Chye, Valerie Seow Wei-Li
Abdul Aziz bin Amir TalibRespondentIndividualArguments upheldWonDaryl Ong Hock Chye, Valerie Seow Wei-Li
Murtada Ali Salem TalibRespondentIndividualArguments rejectedLostLem Jit Min Andy, Ng Hua Meng, Marcus
Ameen Ali Salim TalibRespondentIndividualArguments rejectedLostLem Jit Min Andy, Ng Hua Meng, Marcus
Helmi Bin Ali Bin TalibRespondentIndividualArguments rejectedLostLem Jit Min Andy, Ng Hua Meng, Marcus
Saadaldeen Ali Salim TalibRespondentIndividualArguments rejectedLostLem Jit Min Andy, Ng Hua Meng, Marcus

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Vincent HoongJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Mak Wei MunnAllen & Gledhill LLP
Ong Hui Fen, RachelAllen & Gledhill LLP
Daryl Ong Hock ChyeLawCraft LLC
Valerie Seow Wei-LiLawCraft LLC
Lem Jit Min AndyEversheds Harry Elias LLP
Ng Hua Meng, MarcusEversheds Harry Elias LLP

4. Facts

  1. Mr. Shaik Sallim bin Mohamed bin Sallim bin Talib created a settlement in 1933 to distribute income from immovable properties.
  2. The settlement provided for distribution of income among his family members and their descendants upon his passing.
  3. The settlement income is divided among the Settlor’s children, with sons receiving two portions and daughters receiving one.
  4. Aisha binte Salim bin Talib, a daughter of the Settlor, received one portion of the settlement income.
  5. Aisha passed away in 2008, and her portion was divided among her three sons.
  6. In 2014, Aisha’s son, Shafeeq, died without leaving any offspring.
  7. The court was asked to determine whether Shafeeq’s share should be divided among all surviving beneficiaries or only Aisha’s surviving children.

5. Formal Citations

  1. British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim bin Talib and others, Originating Summons No 163 of 2019, [2019] SGHC 270

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Indenture made to distribute income from immovable properties.
Aisha binte Salim bin Talib passed away.
Shafeeq bin Salim Talib died without offspring.
Hearing date
Judgment date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Construction of Settlement
    • Outcome: The court adopted the branch interpretation, holding that Shafeeq's share should accrue to his siblings within Aisha's portion.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of Clause 3(3)
      • Meaning of 'issue'
      • Meaning of 'per stirpes'
      • Distinction between 'portion' and 'share'
      • Application of Clause 3(7)
    • Related Cases:
      • [1995] 1 SLR(R) 375

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration on the proper construction of the Settlement

9. Cause of Actions

  • Interpretation of Trust Deed

10. Practice Areas

  • Trusts
  • Estate Planning
  • Probate Litigation

11. Industries

  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
OCBC Trustee Ltd v Koh Boon Leong Francis and othersHigh CourtYes[1995] 1 SLR(R) 375SingaporeCited to define the ordinary meaning of 'issue' as the descendants of the Settlor's daughter in all degrees.
Sammut and others v Manzi and othersN/AYes[2009] 1 WLR 1834N/ACited to explain the meaning of 'per stirpes' in the context of distributing a gift to a person who predeceases the testator.
In re TateN/AYes[1914] 2 Ch 182N/ACited as an example of a case where cross-remainder arose, but found to be irrelevant to the present case.
In re Hey’s Settlement TrustsN/AYes[1945] 1 Ch 294N/ACited as an example of a case where cross-remainder arose, but found to be irrelevant to the present case.
Commissioner of Probate Duties v WilsonN/AYes[1979] VR 592N/ACited to define the word 'accrue' as used to denote the addition of further rights or interests to existing rights or interests.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Settlement
  • Settlor
  • Beneficiary
  • Portion
  • Share
  • Issue
  • Per Stirpes
  • Accruing
  • Branch Interpretation
  • Pari Passu Interpretation
  • Original Beneficiary
  • Remoter Issue

15.2 Keywords

  • Trust
  • Will
  • Settlement
  • Beneficiary
  • Singapore
  • Succession
  • Distribution
  • Income
  • Construction

16. Subjects

  • Trusts
  • Wills
  • Estate Planning
  • Succession

17. Areas of Law

  • Trust Law
  • Succession Law
  • Wills and Probate
  • Construction Law