Leong Kah Wah

Leong Kah Wah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated expertise across 84 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	18 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	15 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	15 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bailment	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Slot Charterparty	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bunker Supply	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reef Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Environmental Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Regulations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescue financing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Super priority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
In Rem Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sheriff's Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Cargo Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract of Carriage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Protective Writ	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity of Writ	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Datio in solutum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Property Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Kah Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leong Kah Wah has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	9 cases	38% of cases	Hadian v Ramachandran: Review of Bankrupt's Monthly & Target Contribution(May 2023) Jesse Remalmog v Sevilla Knutsen: Assessment of Damages for Coral Reef Damage(Jan 2022) Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability(Mar 2019)
Rajah & Tann LLP	7 cases	29% of cases	The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Megastar Shipping v ANL Singapore, Sheriff's Expenses in Admiralty Action(Aug 2012) ANL Singapore Pte Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Unpaid Slot Charter-Hire Dispute(Aug 2012) Equatorial Marine v "Bunga Melati 5": Agency by Estoppel & Bunker Supply Dispute(Aug 2012)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	4 cases	17% of cases	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness(May 2002) Ching Ho: Extension of Writ Validity & Non-Disclosure of Material Facts in Admiralty Action(Sep 2001) Falkland Investments Ltd v Vladivostock Base: Competing Claims for Sale Proceeds of the 'Virgo I' ex 'Kapitan Voloshin'(Dec 2000)
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	13% of cases	UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine: Marine Cargo Insurance Claim for Damaged Semiconductor Equipment(Oct 2008) Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd v Samudera Shipping Line Ltd: Stay of Action and Arbitration in Cargo Loss Dispute(Mar 2007) Agritrade International Pte Ltd v Pacific Vigorous Shipping Inc: Misdelivery of Cargo & Election of Remedies(Jun 2006)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	1 cases	4% of cases	Feng Hang: COSCO Breached Contract by Issuing Second Bill of Lading, Causation Dispute(Dec 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leong Kah Wah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 7 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.5 parties avg	3.5	17%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Partial	72.6 parties avg	2.6	29%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4%
Won	93.3 parties avg	3.3	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2015	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leong Kah Wah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(17%)	17%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	7(29%)	29%
Stayed	1(4%)	4%
Unknown	1(4%)	4%
Won	9(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	28,000.00	4,666.676 cases	6
USD	3,728,952.40	1,864,476.202 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Stayed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 4	Partial: 4 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2017	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hadian v Ramachandran: Review of Bankrupt's Monthly & Target Contribution 01 May 2023 Mirmohammadali Hadian (Claimant, Applicant)Neutral	01 May 2023	Mirmohammadali Hadian (Claimant, Applicant): Application not orderedNo order made as to the application; Official Assignee directed to conduct a new determination if certain conditions are met (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Jesse Remalmog v Sevilla Knutsen: Assessment of Damages for Coral Reef Damage 27 Jan 2022 Santus Sarongelfeg (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jan 2022	Santus Sarongelfeg (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $829,650.80 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar valuations and originates from Singapore).
3	Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability 07 Mar 2019 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the ship or vessel “HANJIN RAS LAFFAN” (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	07 Mar 2019	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the ship or vessel “HANJIN RAS LAFFAN” (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim apportionedResponsibility for the collision is apportioned 60:40 in favor of Hanjin Ras Laffan. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Re Attilan Group Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement, Rescue Financing & Super Priority 07 Nov 2017 Phillip Asia Pacific Opportunity Fund Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2017	Phillip Asia Pacific Opportunity Fund Ltd (Respondent): Objection to super priority upheldPhillip Asia's objection to granting super priority status to the proposed financing was upheld.
5	DSA Consultancy v The Eurohope: Action in Rem for Security in Foreign Proceedings 30 Aug 2017 Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the Vessel “Eurohope” (Defendant)Won	30 Aug 2017	Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the Vessel “Eurohope” (Defendant): Writ of summons struck out and warrant of arrest set asideThe writ was struck out, the warrant of arrest was set aside, and the letter of undertaking issued by the American P&I Association was ordered to be returned to the defendant or their solicitors for cancellation forthwith. The court declined to order damages for wrongful arrest or wrongful continuance of arrest of the Vessel.
6	Best Soar Ltd v Praxis Energy Agents Pte Ltd: Forum Non Conveniens & Stay of Proceedings 05 Jul 2017 Best Soar Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	05 Jul 2017	Best Soar Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $6,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by Best Soar to Praxis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa v Sindo Damai Shipping: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 18 Aug 2015 PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Aug 2015	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe Plaintiff's application for the stay of execution was dismissed.
8	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa v Sindo Damai Shipping: Mareva Injunction & Cargo Mis-delivery Dispute 26 Jul 2015 PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Jul 2015	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa (Plaintiff): Application for Mareva relief dismissedThe plaintiff's application for a Mareva injunction against all defendants was dismissed.
9	The “STX Mumbai”: Anticipatory Breach & Insolvency in Bunkering Contract Dispute 23 Jul 2015 Transocean Oil Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Partial	23 Jul 2015	Transocean Oil Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the court allowed the appeal against the Judge’s decision to strike out the Appellant’s claim and to set aside the warrant of arrest. In the circumstances, the court also reserved the question of damages for wrongful arrest to the trial judge after the relevant findings have been made.
10	The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Megastar Shipping v ANL Singapore, Sheriff's Expenses in Admiralty Action 28 Aug 2012 ANL Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)	28 Aug 2012	ANL Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): -
11	ANL Singapore Pte Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Unpaid Slot Charter-Hire Dispute 28 Aug 2012 ANL Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Aug 2012	ANL Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff's claim for unpaid slot charter-hire was upheld.
12	Equatorial Marine v "Bunga Melati 5": Agency by Estoppel & Bunker Supply Dispute 20 Aug 2012 EQUATORIAL MARINE FUEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD (Appellant)Won	20 Aug 2012	EQUATORIAL MARINE FUEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and the appellant's action was restored.
13	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe appeal against setting aside the service of the Writ of Summons was allowed, but the appeal against the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration was dismissed.
14	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part as the decision to set aside the Writ of Summons was overruled, but the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration was affirmed.
15	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal against setting aside the arrest of the vessel was allowed, but the stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration was affirmed.
16	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Admiralty Claim, Beneficial Ownership & Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to set aside the writs and the arrest of the vessel was allowed. The appeal against his decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration was dismissed.
17	UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine: Marine Cargo Insurance Claim for Damaged Semiconductor Equipment 30 Oct 2008 UMCI Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2008	UMCI Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$1,240,000 plus interest at 5.33% from 6 June 2005.
18	Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd v Samudera Shipping Line Ltd: Stay of Action and Arbitration in Cargo Loss Dispute 29 Mar 2007 Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd (Plaintiff)Stayed	29 Mar 2007	Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd (Plaintiff): Action stayedThe present action was stayed pending the result of the arbitration.
19	Agritrade International Pte Ltd v Pacific Vigorous Shipping Inc: Misdelivery of Cargo & Election of Remedies 08 Jun 2006 Pacific Vigorous Shipping Inc (Defendant)Lost	08 Jun 2006	Pacific Vigorous Shipping Inc (Defendant): Appeal DismissedPacific Vigorous Shipping Inc lost the appeal and was ordered to pay costs of $22,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness 08 May 2002 shippers of cargo (Plaintiff)Won	08 May 2002	shippers of cargo (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiffs on their claim, with costs on a standard basis. The registrar is directed to assess the plaintiffs' claim with the costs of such assessment to be reserved to the registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Feng Hang: COSCO Breached Contract by Issuing Second Bill of Lading, Causation Dispute 27 Dec 2001 COSCO Container Lines (Defendant)Won	27 Dec 2001	COSCO Container Lines (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs. Defendant is to have two-thirds of its costs on a standard basis up to 22 June and on an indemnity basis thereafter.
22	Ching Ho: Extension of Writ Validity & Non-Disclosure of Material Facts in Admiralty Action 03 Sep 2001 The owners of the vessels ‘Ching Ho’ and ‘Chun Ho’ (Defendant)Won	03 Sep 2001	The owners of the vessels ‘Ching Ho’ and ‘Chun Ho’ (Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed and the renewal of the writ was set aside.
23	Falkland Investments Ltd v Vladivostock Base: Competing Claims for Sale Proceeds of the 'Virgo I' ex 'Kapitan Voloshin' 13 Dec 2000 Creditor who had obtained a stop order in Adm in Rem 774/98 (Other)Neutral	13 Dec 2000	Creditor who had obtained a stop order in Adm in Rem 774/98 (Other): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
24	STL Machinery v Hai Leck Marine: Indemnity for Shipping Dispute over Crane Volume 20 Jun 2000 STL Machinery Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	20 Jun 2000	STL Machinery Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Entitled to indemnity and damages, amount to be assessedPlaintiffs are entitled to indemnity and damages, but the amount recoverable under the indemnity and the damages recoverable are to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.