Hadian v Ramachandran: Review of Bankrupt's Monthly & Target Contribution

In Mirmohammadali Hadian v Ambika d/o Ramachandran, the High Court of Singapore considered an application by Mirmohammadali Hadian, a creditor, to review the Official Assignee's determination of Ambika d/o Ramachandran's monthly contribution (MC) and target contribution (TC) under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. The court found that the applicant had not shown sufficient reasons to vary the determination but directed the Official Assignee to conduct a new determination if investigations reveal the bankrupt failed to disclose all income or information affecting factors listed in s 339(2) of the IRDA. No order was made as to the application or costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

No order made as to the application; Official Assignee directed to conduct a new determination if certain conditions are met.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court reviewed the Official Assignee's determination of a bankrupt's monthly and target contributions, addressing the factors to be considered.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Official AssigneeNon-partyGovernment AgencyDetermination to be reviewed if conditions metNeutral
Christopher Eng Chee Yang of Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office
Angela Lee of Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office
Mirmohammadali HadianClaimant, ApplicantIndividualApplication not orderedNeutral
Ambika d/o RamachandranDefendant, BankruptIndividualDetermination to be reviewed if conditions metNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Goh YihanJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Christopher Eng Chee YangInsolvency & Public Trustee’s Office
Angela LeeInsolvency & Public Trustee’s Office
Ang Leong HaoRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Leong Kah WahRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Sia Bao HuiRajah & Tann Singapore LLP

4. Facts

  1. The applicant is a creditor of the Bankrupt, with a debt of S$206,337.78.
  2. The Official Assignee determined the Bankrupt's monthly contribution to be S$100 and target contribution to be S$5,200.
  3. The applicant filed an application to review the Official Assignee's determination.
  4. The applicant argued that the Official Assignee did not properly consider the relevant factors under s 339(2) of the IRDA.
  5. The applicant argued that the Bankrupt failed to disclose information to the Official Assignee.
  6. The Official Assignee was willing to review the determination if the Bankrupt failed to declare all her assets.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Mirmohammadali Hadian v Ambika d/o Ramachandran, Bankruptcy No 2829 of 2022 (Summons No 531 of 2023), [2023] SGHC 116

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Applicant applied for a bankruptcy order against the Bankrupt.
Bankruptcy order was granted.
Official Assignee determined the monthly contribution and target contribution of the Bankrupt.
Applicant received Notice of Determination.
Applicant filed SUM 531 to review the Determination.
Official Assignee filed Explanation of Basis of Determination of MC and TC.
Hearing took place.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Review of Monthly Contribution and Target Contribution
    • Outcome: The court found that the applicant had not shown good reasons why the Determination should be varied, but directed the Official Assignee to conduct a new determination if certain conditions are met.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to properly consider relevant factors
      • Failure to disclose information
  2. Service of Notice of Determination
    • Outcome: The court held that the effective date of service of the Notice of Determination is the date on which it was delivered.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Review of the Official Assignee's determination of monthly contribution and target contribution

9. Cause of Actions

  • Review of Official Assignee's Determination

10. Practice Areas

  • Bankruptcy
  • Insolvency
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Zhang Hong En Jonathan v Private Trustee in Bankruptcy of Zhang Hong’En JonathanHigh CourtYes[2021] 4 SLR 139SingaporeCited for the 'perversity standard' in reviewing decisions of a trustee in bankruptcy.
Haotanto Anna Vanessa v Fang Ching Wen TedHigh CourtYes[2022] SGHC 216SingaporeCited for applying the 'perversity standard' to reviews under s 340 of the IRDA.
Chia Kim Huay (litigation representative of the estate of Chua Chye Hee, deceased) v Saw Shu Mawa Min Min and anotherHigh CourtYes[2012] 4 SLR 1096SingaporeCited for the interpretation of s 2(5) of the Interpretation Act regarding service of documents by post.
Qingjian International (South Pacific) Group Development Co Pte Ltd v Capstone Engineering Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2014] SGHCR 5SingaporeCited for the application of s 2(5) of the Interpretation Act regarding service of documents by post.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
s 340(1) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
s 341(1) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
s 339(2) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
s 429(1)(d) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018Singapore
Interpretation Act 1965Singapore
s 2(5) of the Interpretation Act 1965Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Monthly contribution
  • Target contribution
  • Official Assignee
  • Bankruptcy
  • Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018
  • Determination
  • Perversity standard
  • Statement of Affairs

15.2 Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Insolvency
  • Monthly Contribution
  • Target Contribution
  • Official Assignee
  • Review
  • Determination

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Bankruptcy95
Insolvency Law90
Civil Procedure40

16. Subjects

  • Bankruptcy
  • Insolvency
  • Civil Procedure