Leong Wing Tuck

Leong Wing Tuck is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated expertise across 103 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	32 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 32 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	25 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 25 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	14 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Goods and Services Tax (GST)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receiving stolen property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Police Impersonation Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Misappropriation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Servant	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disorderly Behaviour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Car Rental Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loan Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Paypal Credits Scam	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alcohol Intoxication	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Violence Risk Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vandalism	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Declaration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prospectus	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alibi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Regulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Wing Tuck has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leong Wing Tuck has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	23 cases	64% of cases	Ho Man Yuk v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Misappropriation of Property and Statutory Interpretation(Jan 2019) Huang Ying-Chun v Public Prosecutor: Police Impersonation Scam & CDSA Sentencing(Dec 2018) Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor: Litigation Privilege & Disclosure of IMH Reports(Oct 2016)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	6 cases	17% of cases	PP v Noorazni bin Ithnin: Trafficking of Diamorphine (Heroin) under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2009) Public Prosecutor v XT: Rape and Offenses Against Women's Charter(Aug 2008) Wong Shan Shan v Public Prosecutor: Vandalism and Intentional Harassment Sentencing Appeal(Apr 2008)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	4 cases	11% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Galing Anak Kujat: Murder and Robbery under Penal Code(Jul 2010) Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Feb 2010) Public Prosecutor v Yeow Ban Soon: Rape and Hurt Charges in Domestic Violence Context(Apr 2004)
DPPs	1 cases	3% of cases	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking(Jan 2003)
Attorney-General	1 cases	3% of cases	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Defamation Suit(Apr 2002)
State Counsel	1 cases	3% of cases	Attorney General v. Tye Kheng: Land Sale, Price Adjustment & Limitation(Sep 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leong Wing Tuck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 2 (6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.3 parties avg	2.3	22%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	3%
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	232.2 parties avg	2.2	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2011	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leong Wing Tuck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(22%)	22%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(11%)	11%
Won	23(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	600,983.10	120,196.625 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2008	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2009	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2012	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Man Yuk v Public Prosecutor: Dishonest Misappropriation of Property and Statutory Interpretation 06 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Court of Appeal answered the question in the negative and affirmed the convictions.
2	Huang Ying-Chun v Public Prosecutor: Police Impersonation Scam & CDSA Sentencing 05 Dec 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	05 Dec 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartThe Public Prosecutor's original sentencing was partially dismissed as the appeal was allowed and the sentence was reduced.
3	Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor: Litigation Privilege & Disclosure of IMH Reports 10 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	10 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCriminal revision allowed. Disclosure Order set aside; retrial ordered before a different district judge.
4	Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence and Application of Section 301 of the Criminal Procedure Code 12 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	12 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; appellant ordered to undergo 12 months MTO and fines paid to be refunded in full (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Public Prosecutor v Tan Peng Khoon: Extension of Time for Appeal on Forgery and Cheating Charges 12 Nov 2015 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Won	12 Nov 2015	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Motion AllowedThe Prosecution's motion for an extension of time to file its Petition of Appeal was allowed.
6	PP v Saiful Rizam: Theft as Servant & Dishonest Receiving of Stolen Property 14 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	14 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences was dismissed.
7	PP v Ng Kim Hong: Criminal Breach of Trust, Cheating, and Theft in Dwelling Sentencing Appeal 06 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the original sentence was allowed.
8	Ong Mingwee v Public Prosecutor: Rape Conviction Appeal - Consent and Mistake of Fact 29 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	29 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction obtained by the Public Prosecutor.
9	Public Prosecutor v Amir Hamzah: Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant 12 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	12 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased.
10	Ezmiwardi bin Kanan v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust Appeal 04 Mar 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	04 Mar 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Tuan Foo Pao v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Voluntarily Causing Hurt and Disorderly Behavior 06 Feb 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Feb 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed.
12	Public Prosecutor v Syamsul Hilal: Cheating, CBT, Internet Scams & Sentencing 29 Dec 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	29 Dec 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced from 10 months to 15 months' imprisonment.
13	Public Prosecutor v Leow Kok Meng: Culpable Homicide and Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt with Knife 07 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted on the charges and sentenced to life imprisonment for each offence.
14	Pang Siew Fum v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Possession 21 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Pang Siew Fum and Cheong Chun Yin.
15	PP v AOF: Father Convicted of Sexual Offences Against Daughter 20 Dec 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Dec 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
16	PP v Sng Chun Heng: Drug Trafficking - Abetment & Delivery of Diamorphine 25 Oct 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Oct 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionBoth accused were convicted.
17	Public Prosecutor v Galing Anak Kujat: Murder and Robbery under Penal Code 29 Jul 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Jul 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionBoth accused were convicted of murder.
18	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine 03 Feb 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Feb 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionBoth accused persons were found guilty.
19	PP v Sarle Steepan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant Death 14 Sep 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Sep 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
20	Public Prosecutor v Gansean: Rape Conviction Upheld on Appeal 07 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	07 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the judge’s decision to convict the respondent for the offence of carnal connection under the Women’s Charter was allowed.
21	PP v Noorazni bin Ithnin: Trafficking of Diamorphine (Heroin) under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Mar 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	22 Mar 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution proved its case against the Accused beyond reasonable doubt.
22	Public Prosecutor v XT: Rape and Offenses Against Women's Charter 11 Aug 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	11 Aug 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction under s 140(1)(i) of the Women’s CharterThe accused was convicted under section 140(1)(i) of the Women’s Charter. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	XP v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty, Standard of Proof, and Witness Credibility 03 Jul 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	03 Jul 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's case was dismissed on appeal.
24	Public Prosecutor v Neo Boon Seng: Criminal Misappropriation by Taxi Driver & Sentencing Appeal 12 Jun 2008 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	12 Jun 2008	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted.
25	Wong Shan Shan v Public Prosecutor: Vandalism and Intentional Harassment Sentencing Appeal 08 Apr 2008 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2008	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; original sentence deemed manifestly excessive and reduced.
26	Auston International Group Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Misleading Prospectus & Securities Act Violation 11 Dec 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): LostAppeal against the quantum of the fine was allowed and the fine was reduced to $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Chee Soon Juan v Public Prosecutor: Bankruptcy Act Violation and Attempt to Leave Singapore Without Permission 19 Sep 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 Sep 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.
28	Lee Kuan Tat v PP: Unlicensed Moneylending Appeal - Default Sentence & Disparity 13 May 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 May 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
29	Jagir Singh Touwana v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Illegal Parking 21 Feb 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
30	Chu Wai Kiu v PP: Customs Act - Failure to Declare Jewellery & Pay GST 13 Feb 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Feb 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Order of forfeiture upheldThe court upheld the order to forfeit the jewellery.
31	Public Prosecutor v Yeow Ban Soon: Rape and Hurt Charges in Domestic Violence Context 12 Apr 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	12 Apr 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused acquitted of rape charges; convicted of causing hurtAccused acquitted of rape charges but convicted of causing hurt.
32	Public Prosecutor v AA: Sentencing for Sodomy Offences Involving Minors 19 Jan 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Jan 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to a total of three years and nine months imprisonment.
33	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking 21 Jan 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the convictions.
34	Public Prosecutor v Saminathan: Murder and Robbery Case 31 Oct 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	31 Oct 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty plea accepted for reduced charges.The Public Prosecutor accepted the accused's guilty plea to reduced charges of manslaughter and robbery.
35	Attorney General v. Tye Kheng: Land Sale, Price Adjustment & Limitation 12 Sep 2002 Attorney-General (Plaintiff)Won	12 Sep 2002	Attorney-General (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff as claimed with costs. The plaintiff was claiming $588,983.10. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Defamation Suit 17 Apr 2002 Attorney-General (Respondent)Neutral	17 Apr 2002	Attorney-General (Respondent): NeutralThe Attorney General was served with the application and provided their views to the court. The outcome of this application does not directly impact the Attorney General.