Ezmiwardi bin Kanan v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust Appeal

In Ezmiwardi bin Kanan v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against the District Court's conviction of Ezmiwardi bin Kanan for criminal breach of trust. The charges stemmed from a car sale transaction where the complainant alleged that Ezmiwardi failed to redeem a car loan after receiving payment. Lee Seiu Kin J allowed the appeal, acquitting Ezmiwardi, finding that the prosecution had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Ezmiwardi received the full amount required to redeem the car loan.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court allowed Ezmiwardi bin Kanan's appeal, acquitting him of criminal breach of trust due to insufficient evidence of misappropriation.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedLost
Ng Yiwen of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Leong Wing Tuck of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Ezmiwardi bin KananAppellantIndividualAppeal AllowedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ng YiwenAttorney-General’s Chambers
Leong Wing TuckAttorney-General’s Chambers
Zero Geraldo Mario NalponNalpon & Company

4. Facts

  1. The complainant owned a Hyundai Matrix with an outstanding loan of $42,000.
  2. The appellant, a car salesman, agreed to buy the car for $29,200.
  3. The complainant was to pay the appellant $13,000 to cover the difference between the car's value and the outstanding loan.
  4. The appellant sold the car to a re-exporter for $4,000.
  5. The complainant made a police report alleging the appellant failed to perform his end of the bargain.
  6. The complainant initially stated in the police report that he paid the appellant $8,000.
  7. The appellant issued two cheques totalling $3,055.86 to Apex Global for the complainant's new car.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ezmiwardi bin Kanan v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate's Appeal No 401 of 2010/01-03, [2012] SGHC 44

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Complainant delivered the Hyundai Matrix to the appellant.
Appellant sold the Hyundai Matrix to a re-exporter.
Alleged payment of $6,412 by the complainant to the appellant.
Appellant issued two cheques totalling $3,055.86 to Apex Global.
Complainant made a police report.
Appellant convicted of the first charge in District Court.
High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Criminal Breach of Trust
    • Outcome: The court held that the prosecution had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant received the full amount required to redeem the car loan, thus failing to establish criminal wrongdoing.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Fine

9. Cause of Actions

  • Criminal Breach of Trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • Automotive

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code, Chapter 224, Section 406Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Car loan redemption
  • Preferential Additional Registration Fee
  • Certificate of Entitlement
  • Car re-exporter

15.2 Keywords

  • Criminal Breach of Trust
  • Car Sales
  • Singapore
  • Appeal
  • Acquittal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Breach of Trust
  • Motor Vehicle Sales