Liew Teck Huat

Liew Teck Huat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 59 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 17 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated expertise across 200 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	39 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 39 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	21 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 21 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	17 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	16 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	16 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	10 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	10 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Comity	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of negative covenant	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Societies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rule against bias	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Registration of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warrant of arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effect of amendment of statement of claim on in rem writ and warrant of arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stakeholding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cybersquatting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Relationship Manager	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of companies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Piercing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Choice of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Internal disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Encumbrances	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good and Marketable Title	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Art Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Association Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Charges	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Horse Racing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dredging and Reclamation Works	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apportioning Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Retrocession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revision of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Translation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Practice and procedure of action in rem	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Computation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Experts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Switch Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negative Covenant	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Teck Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Liew Teck Huat has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 28 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Niru & Co LLC	28 cases	47% of cases	Jhaveri v Salgaocar: Application to Dismiss Suit Based on Prior Judgment(Oct 2024) Durairaj Santiran v Singapore Airlines: Negligence & Employer's Duty of Care(Oct 2024) Jeil Crystal: BCGE v Jeil Intl - Switch Bills of Lading, Wrongful Arrest(Mar 2024)
Niru & Co	12 cases	20% of cases	Centaurus Enterprises v Foong Yew Eong: Employee Misappropriation and Conspiracy(Nov 2008) MISC Bhd v Griffin Kinetic: Lien & Contract Dispute over Turbine Storage Charges(Sep 2008) Polar Arts v Hotline KTV: Assessment of Damages for Water Damage to Qing Dynasty Scrolls(Mar 2004)
Global Law Alliance LLC	10 cases	17% of cases	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Edward Hong: Assessment of Damages for MEC Charge Removal(Sep 2016) Ng Kong Choon v Tang Wee Goh: Claim-Splitting Prohibition under Subordinate Courts Act(Apr 2016) Nava Bharat v Straits Law: Professional Negligence & Breach of Contract in Coal Mine Acquisition(Feb 2016)
Niru and Co	6 cases	10% of cases	Jan De Nul NV v Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd ("Inai Selasih") : Admiralty Jurisdiction, Sham Charterparty & Vessel Arrest(Feb 2006) Inai Selasih (ex Geopotes X): Admiralty Jurisdiction, Wrongful Arrest & Sham Charterparty Dispute(Jul 2005) Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew: Personal Injury Claim for Damages Following Traffic Accident(Oct 2004)
Global Alliance LLC	1 cases	2% of cases	Banque Cantonale v Allen & Gledhill: Discovery, Fishing Expeditions, and Legal Professional Negligence(Feb 2010)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	2% of cases	Lim Chun Yong v Yap Jeffrey: Negligence, Motor Accidents, and Damages for Brain Injuries(Jun 2024)
Niru & Company	1 cases	2% of cases	Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay v Teo Eng Chuan: Personal Injury Claim for Whiplash Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity(Apr 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liew Teck Huat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 17 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	2%
Lost	334.0 parties avg	4.0	56%
Neutral	35.4 parties avg	5.4	5%
Partial	144.4 parties avg	4.4	24%
Won	112.8 parties avg	2.8	19%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	46.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2015	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2016	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	66.6 parties avg	6.6
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	62.8 parties avg	2.8
2024	44.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liew Teck Huat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(2%)	2%
Lost	33(53%)	53%
Neutral	3(5%)	5%
Partial	14(23%)	23%
Won	11(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,118,541.70	31,958.3335 cases	35
USD	93,493.02	93,493.021 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)
2004	5 122	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	7 16	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 6 cases (85.7%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2024	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 59 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jhaveri v Salgaocar: Application to Dismiss Suit Based on Prior Judgment 27 Oct 2024 Winter Meadow Capital Inc (Defendant)Neutral	27 Oct 2024	Winter Meadow Capital Inc (Defendant): Applications dismissedApplications to dismiss the suits were dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Durairaj Santiran v Singapore Airlines: Negligence & Employer's Duty of Care 17 Oct 2024 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Oct 2024	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant.
3	Lim Chun Yong v Yap Jeffrey: Negligence, Motor Accidents, and Damages for Brain Injuries 09 Jun 2024 AmGeneral Insurance Berhad (Formerly Known As Kurnia Insurans (Malaysia) Berhad) (Defendant)Neutral	09 Jun 2024	AmGeneral Insurance Berhad (Formerly Known As Kurnia Insurans (Malaysia) Berhad) (Defendant): NeutralThe sixth defendant was the insurer of the Toyota at all material times.
4	Jeil Crystal: BCGE v Jeil Intl - Switch Bills of Lading, Wrongful Arrest 14 Mar 2024 Owners of or other persons interested in the cargo lately laden onboard “Jeil Crystal” (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Mar 2024	Owners of or other persons interested in the cargo lately laden onboard “Jeil Crystal” (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract, negligence, and bailment dismissed.
5	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Purnima Anil Salgaocar: Breach of Settlement Agreement Dispute 12 Oct 2023 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (suing as the administratrix of the estate of Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar, deceased) (Claimant)Lost	12 Oct 2023	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (suing as the administratrix of the estate of Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar, deceased) (Claimant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Abcom Pte Ltd v TransAsia Private Capital Ltd: Injunction Against Winding Up Application & Moneylenders Act 30 Aug 2023 Abcom Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	30 Aug 2023	Abcom Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissedApplication for injunction to restrain winding up application was dismissed.
7	Vangal v Indian Overseas Bank: Setting Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment 09 Jul 2023 Ramesh Vangal (Appellant, Applicant, Respondent)Lost	09 Jul 2023	Ramesh Vangal (Appellant, Applicant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the dismissal of SUM 2662 was dismissed. Costs of S$20,000 awarded to IOB (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Purnima Anil Salgaocar v Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar: Appeal on Injunction & Contractual Interpretation 04 Jun 2023 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (suing as the administratrix of the estate of Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar, deceased) (Respondent, Claimant)Lost	04 Jun 2023	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (suing as the administratrix of the estate of Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar, deceased) (Respondent, Claimant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and injunction set aside. Ordered to pay costs of OA 10 and AD 81 fixed at $23,000 all in. Ordered to pay costs of SUM 2031 fixed at $10,000 all in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Purnima Anil Salgaocar: Enforceability of Negative Covenant in Settlement Agreement 27 Feb 2023 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Claimant)Won	27 Feb 2023	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Claimant): Injunction GrantedInterim injunction granted restraining the defendant from bringing proceedings other than for breach of the second settlement agreement, until HC/S 821/2015 is disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Indian Overseas Bank v Seabulk Inc: Registration of Foreign Judgment & Adjournment Application 22 Feb 2023 Ramesh Vangal (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2023	Ramesh Vangal (Respondent): Application DismissedSUM 4456 and SUM 2662 dismissed.
11	Jeil Crystal: Arrest Warrant Validity After Claim Amendment in Admiralty Law 16 Oct 2022 Owners of cargo lately laden onboard JEIL CRYSTAL (IMO No. 9193587) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	16 Oct 2022	Owners of cargo lately laden onboard JEIL CRYSTAL (IMO No. 9193587) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay JIL costs of $35,000 (all-in) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Smart Property Management v Management Corp: Breach of Contract & Managing Agent Duties 13 Sep 2022 Smart Property Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	13 Sep 2022	Smart Property Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in relation to the Landscape Works and Hoarding Works but allowed in relation to the EM Locks.
13	Banque Cantonale v Jeil Crystal: Admiralty Claim Amendment & Warrant of Arrest 29 Dec 2021 Owners of or other persons interested in the cargo lately laden onboard “Jeil Crystal” (Plaintiff)Won	29 Dec 2021	Owners of or other persons interested in the cargo lately laden onboard “Jeil Crystal” (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application to amend its Statement of Claim was allowed.
14	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Breach of Confidence & Surreptitious Email Extraction 14 Nov 2021 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Nov 2021	Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff; permanent injunction granted. Claims for damages dismissed.
15	Lau Soon v UOL Development: Stakeholding Sum Dispute & Limitation Act 18 Aug 2021 Ng Bee Hoon (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	18 Aug 2021	Ng Bee Hoon (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding interest payment.
16	Rahman Mohammad Jillour v Paretam Singh: Account of Settlement Moneys & Solicitor's Bill of Costs 09 Feb 2021 Paretam Singh s/o Kishen Singh@ Pritam Singh Gill (Defendant)Won	09 Feb 2021	Paretam Singh s/o Kishen Singh@ Pritam Singh Gill (Defendant): Application refusedThe court refused the plaintiff's application and ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant costs fixed at S$8,000 with disbursements fixed at S$1,047.66 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Shankar’s Emporium Pte Ltd v Bhojwani: Trust Property Accounting & Corporate Document Disclosure 09 Nov 2020 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Defendant)Neutral	09 Nov 2020	Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Defendant): NeutralDid not take a position on the substantive issue.
18	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Trust Account, Res Judicata & Trustee Powers 07 Oct 2020 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Oct 2020	Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff): Application granted in partHusband is to provide an account of the trust property until 9 January 2020 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	3 Corporate Services v Grabtaxi: Domain Name Dispute & Cybersquatting 21 Jan 2020 Grabtaxi Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Won	21 Jan 2020	Grabtaxi Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the defendant, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute 25 Jul 2019 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	25 Jul 2019	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the respondent to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Abhilash v Yeo Hock Huat: Share Valuation Dispute in Oppression Suit 25 Feb 2019 Abhilash s/o Kunchian Krishnan (Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2019	Abhilash s/o Kunchian Krishnan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $50,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Mukherjee v. Biswas: Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Tort of Deceit, Investments, Banking Relationship Manager 10 Dec 2018 Indian Ocean Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	10 Dec 2018	Indian Ocean Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore, as the judgment originates from Singapore.)
23	Abhilash v. Yeo: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression Claim 29 Apr 2018 Abhilash s/o Kunchian Krishnan (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Apr 2018	Abhilash s/o Kunchian Krishnan (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe court valued JCS-Vanetec on a net assets basis and ordered Mr. Yeo to purchase Mr. Abhilash's shares for $15,242.83 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Lakshmi v Jhaveri: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute in BVI Share Ownership 16 Apr 2018 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	16 Apr 2018	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for anti-suit injunction dismissed; costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Hadley James Chilton: Setting Aside Leave for Service Out of Jurisdiction 15 Apr 2018 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Apr 2018	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff): Application to set aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction granted against PlaintiffApplication to set aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction granted against Plaintiff; costs of $10,000 excluding disbursements were granted to the defendants, with disbursements to be determined. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Jhaveri v Salgaocar: Caveat Removal, Reverse Piercing & Corporate Veil 30 Jan 2018 Arjun Anil Salgaocar (Defendant)Lost	30 Jan 2018	Arjun Anil Salgaocar (Defendant): Application AllowedApplication for removal of caveats allowed against the defendant.
27	Goh Bee Lan v Yap Soon Guan: Summary Judgment & Economic Duress in Loan Agreement Restructuring 17 Jan 2018 Wenda Ng Li Ha (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	17 Jan 2018	Wenda Ng Li Ha (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the assistant registrar’s decision dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	DSA Consultancy v The Eurohope: Action in Rem for Security in Foreign Proceedings 30 Aug 2017 DSA Consultancy (FZC) (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Aug 2017	DSA Consultancy (FZC) (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedPlaintiff's application for a stay of proceedings and for the maintenance of security pending the final determination of the London proceedings was dismissed.
29	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya: Striking Out Action & Standing to Sue Without Letters of Administration 25 May 2017 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	25 May 2017	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs in respect of Registrar's Appeal No 13 to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, to be taxed if not agreed. No order as to costs for Registrar's Appeal No 31. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Edward Hong: Assessment of Damages for MEC Charge Removal 08 Sep 2016 Albert Hong Hin Kay (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2016	Albert Hong Hin Kay (Defendant): PartialLiable for damages awarded for Kusnandar's fees in the amount of $46,746.51 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
31	Ng Kong Choon v Tang Wee Goh: Claim-Splitting Prohibition under Subordinate Courts Act 28 Apr 2016 Ng Kong Choon (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2016	Ng Kong Choon (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
32	Nava Bharat v Straits Law: Professional Negligence & Breach of Contract in Coal Mine Acquisition 25 Feb 2016 Nava Bharat (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	25 Feb 2016	Nava Bharat (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal in CA 129/2015 was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Dukkar S.A v Thailand Integrated Services: Mareva Injunction & Breach of Contract Dispute 06 Sep 2015 Dukkar S.A (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Sep 2015	Dukkar S.A (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for Mareva injunction dismissed with costs fixed at $9,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Columbia Asia v Hong: Share Purchase Agreement Dispute over Hospital Acquisition 21 Jan 2015 Albert Hong Hin Kay (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	21 Jan 2015	Albert Hong Hin Kay (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part, Appeal allowed in partAppeal in CA 68 dismissed; appeal in CA 69 allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Hong Hin Kay Albert v AAHG, LLC: Anti-Suit Injunction & Share Misappropriation 16 Oct 2014 Edward Hong Hin Kit (Plaintiff)Won	16 Oct 2014	Edward Hong Hin Kit (Plaintiff): Application for anti-suit injunction allowedApplication for anti-suit injunction allowed; costs awarded to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Hong Hin Kit: Share Purchase Agreement & Breach of Warranties 09 Apr 2014 Thermal International (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Apr 2014	Thermal International (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment against PTNM for S$393,399.70. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Abdul Hadi bin Hamdan v Goldin Enterprise: Interpretation of Work Injury Compensation Act 16 Sep 2012 Abdul Hadi bin Hamdan (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	16 Sep 2012	Abdul Hadi bin Hamdan (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.
38	Hong Hin Kit Edward v PT Nusautama: Abuse of Process, Conspiracy, and Rectification of Share Sale Agreement 05 Jul 2010 Albert Hong (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jul 2010	Albert Hong (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal in RA 139 of 2010 was dismissed.
39	Banque Cantonale v Allen & Gledhill: Discovery, Fishing Expeditions, and Legal Professional Negligence 08 Feb 2010 Banque Cantonale de Geneve SA (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Feb 2010	Banque Cantonale de Geneve SA (Plaintiff): Partial SuccessFurther and better list of documents ordered for specific categories.
40	Bahtera Offshore v Sim Kok Beng: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Non-Disclosure 02 Aug 2009 Bahtera Offshore (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Aug 2009	Bahtera Offshore (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedDefendants’ application in Summons No. 1154 of 2009 to set aside the ex parte Mareva injunction obtained on 12 February 2009 allowed. Costs for this application were ordered at $500 to the Defendants. Costs and disbursements of Defendants’ application for the setting aside were fixed at $4,000 to be paid by the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
41	Centaurus Enterprises v Foong Yew Eong: Employee Misappropriation and Conspiracy 03 Nov 2008 Centaurus Enterprises (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Nov 2008	Centaurus Enterprises (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment with costs in favor of the plaintiff against the third defendant. An account and/or inquiry shall be taken/held by the Registrar to determine the sums misappropriated.
42	MISC Bhd v Griffin Kinetic: Lien & Contract Dispute over Turbine Storage Charges 15 Sep 2008 MISC Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Sep 2008	MISC Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Jan De Nul NV v Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd ("Inai Selasih") : Admiralty Jurisdiction, Sham Charterparty & Vessel Arrest 01 Feb 2006 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Partial	01 Feb 2006	Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Order for damages set asideThe order for damages in favor of the respondent was set aside. The Writ and Warrant of Arrest remained set aside.
44	Inai Selasih (ex Geopotes X): Admiralty Jurisdiction, Wrongful Arrest & Sham Charterparty Dispute 24 Jul 2005 Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	24 Jul 2005	Inai Kiara Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Writ of Summons and Warrant of Arrest set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew: Personal Injury Claim for Damages Following Traffic Accident 12 Oct 2004 Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Oct 2004	Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for 50% of the assessed damages, totaling $78,261.25 and RM 75. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	The Hyundai Fortune: Stay of Proceedings and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause Dispute 08 Sep 2004 Wholesale fruit merchants (Respondent)Won	08 Sep 2004	Wholesale fruit merchants (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court upheld the decision to allow the action to proceed in Singapore.
47	Polar Arts v Hotline KTV: Assessment of Damages for Water Damage to Qing Dynasty Scrolls 07 Mar 2004 Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Mar 2004	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against the second defendants in the sum of S$209,080.75, with interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
48	Uni-Fruitveg Suppliers v Hyundai Fortune: Stay of Action & Choice of Jurisdiction 29 Feb 2004 Uni-Fruitveg Suppliers (Plaintiff)Won	29 Feb 2004	Uni-Fruitveg Suppliers (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of the appeal and below fixed at $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
49	Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 17 Feb 2004 Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Feb 2004	Ang Kuang Hoe (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for 50% of the amount of damages assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
50	Teo Eng Chuan v Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay: Appeal on Damages Assessment under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 07 Oct 2003 Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	07 Oct 2003	Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay (Applicant, Respondent): Motion DismissedMotion to strike out the notice of appeal was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
51	Bernard Desker Gary v Thwaites Racing: Negligence, Conversion, and Contractual Terms in Racehorse Training 14 Aug 2003 Goh Siok Piew (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Aug 2003	Goh Siok Piew (Plaintiff): Partial WinJudgment for the plaintiff on the claim of conversion; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
52	Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay v Teo Eng Chuan: Personal Injury Claim for Whiplash Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity 20 Apr 2003 Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	20 Apr 2003	Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the award for loss of future earning capacity was increased to $180,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
53	Kanesananthan v Singapore Ceylon Tamils' Association: Validity of Amended Constitution and Disciplinary Proceedings 14 Apr 2003 A Kanesananthan (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Apr 2003	A Kanesananthan (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application to nullify the defendant's constitution and restrain disciplinary proceedings was dismissed. The plaintiff must bear the costs of the ex parte application and the defendant's application to discharge it.
54	Mathi Alegen v The Tamils Representative Council: Wrongful Expulsion & Defamation 29 Dec 2002 Mathi Alegen s/o Gothendaraman (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2002	Mathi Alegen s/o Gothendaraman (Plaintiff): Actions dismissedPlaintiff's actions against all the Defendants were dismissed. The Plaintiff was ordered to pay 70% of the costs of the actions (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
55	Mumthaj Beevi v Niru & Co: Interlocutory Judgment Appeal & Fraud Allegations 20 Sep 2002 M/s Niru & Co (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Sep 2002	M/s Niru & Co (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, upholding the interlocutory judgment against the Defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
56	Overseas Union Insurance v Home and Overseas Insurance: Reinsurance, Retrocession, and Commutation Agreement Dispute 19 May 2002 Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	19 May 2002	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
57	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Home and Overseas Insurance Co Ltd: Appeal on Costs & Leave to Appeal 22 Apr 2002 Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2002	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the District Judge's decision dismissed. Leave to appeal refused. No order as to costs.
58	Overseas Union Insurance v Turegum Insurance: Governing Law & Arbitration Clauses in Reinsurance Contracts 21 Jun 2001 Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jun 2001	Overseas Union Insurance Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe claim of the plaintiffs Overseas Union Insurance Ltd was dismissed.
59	Chen Qingrui v Phua Geok Leng: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury 29 Mar 2001 Chen Qingrui suing by her father and next friend Tan Kok Kiong (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Mar 2001	Chen Qingrui suing by her father and next friend Tan Kok Kiong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Contributory negligence found; Plaintiff equally responsible for the accident. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.