Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Purnima Anil Salgaocar: Enforceability of Negative Covenant in Settlement Agreement

In Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Purnima Anil Salgaocar, the High Court of Singapore addressed a dispute between a mother (claimant) and daughter (defendant) over the administration of an estate. The claimant sought an interim injunction to prevent the defendant from initiating separate probate proceedings, arguing it breached a negative covenant in their settlement agreement. The court, presided over by Senior Judge Lai Siu Chiu, granted the injunction, holding that the defendant's actions breached the negative covenant, and the appropriate course of action would have been to sue on the agreement.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Interim injunction granted to the claimant.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Dispute over estate administration leads to a legal battle on the enforceability of a negative covenant in a settlement agreement.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Lakshmi Anil SalgaocarClaimantIndividualInjunction GrantedWonNiru Pillai, Liew Teck Huat, Phang Cun Kuang
Purnima Anil SalgaocarDefendant, AppellantIndividualInjunction Granted AgainstLostLim Gerui, Estad Amber Joy, Melinna Teo

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuSenior JudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Niru PillaiNiru & Co LLC
Liew Teck HuatNiru & Co LLC
Phang Cun KuangNiru & Co LLC
Lim GeruiDrew & Napier LLC
Estad Amber JoyDrew & Napier LLC
Melinna TeoDrew & Napier LLC

4. Facts

  1. Claimant is the administratrix of her deceased husband's estate.
  2. Defendant is the daughter of the claimant and a beneficiary of the estate.
  3. Parties entered into a settlement agreement to resolve disputes over estate administration.
  4. The settlement agreement contained a negative covenant restricting litigation.
  5. Defendant initiated probate proceedings, which claimant alleged breached the covenant.
  6. Claimant sought an injunction to restrain the defendant from proceeding with the probate action.
  7. Claimant ceased making monthly payments, claiming defendant's actions were a repudiatory breach.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (suing as the administratrix of the estate of Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar, deceased) v Purnima Anil Salgaocar, Originating Claim No 49 of 2022 (Summons No 2031 of 2022), [2023] SGHC 49

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Anil Vassudeva Salgaocar passed away.
Parties entered into first settlement agreement.
Parties entered into second settlement agreement.
Claimant filed application for injunction.
Hearing of the case.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Enforceability of Negative Covenant
    • Outcome: The court held that the negative covenant was enforceable and not conditional on the claimant's full compliance with the settlement agreement.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Conditional operation of negative covenant
      • Breach of settlement agreement
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] 2 SLR 997
  2. Interpretation of Contractual Terms
    • Outcome: The court interpreted the settlement agreement using a holistic approach, considering the entire contract rather than isolated clauses.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Rules of construction
      • Whole contract approach
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] 3 SLR(R) 1029

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Interim Injunction

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Enforcement of Negative Covenant

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Estate Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
RGA Holdings International Inc v Loh Choon Phing Robin and anotherHigh CourtYes[2017] 2 SLR 997SingaporeCited for the principle that an injunction should be granted as a matter of course when a breach of a negative covenant has occurred.
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon LimitedHouse of LordsNo[1975] AC 396England and WalesCited for the balance of convenience test in interim injunction applications, which the court found to be inapplicable in this case.
Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd v B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 1029SingaporeCited for the 'whole contract' approach to contractual interpretation.
Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd v Avant Garde Maritime Services (Pte) LtdCourt of AppealYes[2019] 2 SLR 131SingaporeCited for the principle that a settlement agreement puts an end to prior proceedings and supersedes the original cause of action.
CSDS Aircraft Sales & Leasing Inc v Singapore Airlines LtdCourt of AppealYes[2022] 1 SLR 284SingaporeCited for the principle that a plea for specific performance does not necessarily constitute an affirmation of a contract or waiver of prior repudiatory breaches.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Negative Covenant
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Interim Injunction
  • Estate Administration
  • Non-India Assets
  • Repudiatory Breach
  • Specific Performance

15.2 Keywords

  • negative covenant
  • settlement agreement
  • injunction
  • estate
  • probate

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Estate Law
  • Injunctions

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Injunctions
  • Probate Law
  • Settlement Agreements