Lim Chee San

Lim Chee San is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and torts. Their track record shows a 19.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Chee San has demonstrated expertise across 115 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	16 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	10 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty as to materials and workmanship	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to design	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice12% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Holding Over	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Law Rectification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Rectification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Worksite Safety	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crane Operation Safety	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agents and Brokers Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Creditors Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Management Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lim Chee San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Chee San has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TanLim Partnership	21 cases	84% of cases	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition(Jan 2025) Kwek Hong Lim v Kwek Sum Chuan: Oral Contract Dispute over Supermarket Shares and Property(Mar 2023) Energy & Commodity Pte Ltd v BTS Tankers: Appeal on Contempt of Court and Striking Out Defenses(Aug 2021)
Yeo Marini & Partners	2 cases	8% of cases	Moh Seng Cranes v Hup Hin: Crane Damage Due to Worksite Negligence(Dec 2012) Sheng Siong v Carilla: Lease Agreement Dispute over Supermarket Use Approval(Sep 2011)
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation	1 cases	4% of cases	Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor Negligence(Mar 2019)
Tan Lim Partnership	1 cases	4% of cases	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Chee San's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 8 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	173.9 parties avg	3.9	68%
Partial	42.5 parties avg	2.5	16%
Won	53.0 parties avg	3.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2021	64.3 parties avg	4.3
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Chee San's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(65%)	65%
Partial	4(15%)	15%
Won	5(19%)	19%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,860,536.01	204,324.0014 cases	14
USD	2,699,793.30	2,699,793.301 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 3	Partial: 3 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	6 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition 26 Jan 2025 Tong Chi Ho (Defendant)Lost	26 Jan 2025	Tong Chi Ho (Defendant): Liable in the tort of deceitDefendant found liable in the tort of deceit and is jointly and severally liable for the sums awarded to the claimant.
2	Kwek Hong Lim v Kwek Sum Chuan: Oral Contract Dispute over Supermarket Shares and Property 22 Mar 2023 Kwek Hong Lim (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Mar 2023	Kwek Hong Lim (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for 60% of the shareholding in YES Supermarket Pte Ltd and 60% of a property was dismissed.
3	Energy & Commodity Pte Ltd v BTS Tankers: Appeal on Contempt of Court and Striking Out Defenses 04 Aug 2021 Dinh Thi Hoang Uyen (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2021	Dinh Thi Hoang Uyen (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of S$65,000 to the respondent on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Sun Electric Power v RCMA Asia: Winding Up Appeal Based on Insolvency 09 Jun 2021 Sun Electric Power Pte Limited (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	09 Jun 2021	Sun Electric Power Pte Limited (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $50,000 in costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Italmatic Tyre v CIMB Bank: Set-Off Agreement & Debt Assignment Dispute 19 May 2021 Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	19 May 2021	Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Italmatic to pay CIMB $55,000 for costs of the appeal and unsuccessful applications (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Sun Electric v Menrva Solutions: Damages Assessment for Breach of Contract 06 May 2021 Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 May 2021	Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	BTS Tankers v Energy & Commodity: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Discovery Orders 14 Mar 2021 Dinh Thi Hoang Uyen (Defendant)Lost	14 Mar 2021	Dinh Thi Hoang Uyen (Defendant): Committal Order IssuedThe Fourth defendant is committed to five months’ imprisonment for contempt of court but the committal order is suspended for seven days provided the Fourth defendant complies with all her disclosure obligations under the three orders of court named (at [10] above) by 5 pm of Monday 2 November 2020.
8	RCMA Asia v Matthew Peloso: Contempt of Court for Breaching Injunction Order 13 Jan 2021 Matthew Peloso (Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2021	Matthew Peloso (Respondent): LostPeloso was found in contempt of court for making the September 2018 Withdrawal in breach of the Injunction Order. A fine of $15,000 (in default, ten days’ imprisonment) was imposed. Peloso was also ordered to pay costs in connection with these proceedings in the total sum of $16,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Tian Kong Buddhist Temple v Tuan Kong Beo (Teochew) Temple: Dispute over Temple Usage Agreement 10 Dec 2020 Tian Kong Buddhist Temple (Appellant)Won	10 Dec 2020	Tian Kong Buddhist Temple (Appellant): Appeal AllowedDistrict Court Appeal No 33 of 2020 is allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	RCMA Asia v Sun Electric Power: Winding Up Order for Insolvency & Breach of Injunction 29 Sep 2020 Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2020	Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up orderedOrdered that Sun Electric Power Pte Ltd be wound up and a liquidator appointed over SEPPL. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	CIMB Bank Bhd v Italmatic Tyre: Assignment, Set-Off & Recovery of US$2.43M Debt 29 Jul 2020 Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2020	Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's set-off and cancellation defenses were rejected, and the plaintiff's claim was allowed. The defendant is liable for the outstanding principal sum, contractual interest, and costs of the action.
12	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner' 14 Nov 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	14 Nov 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe MCST's appeal was allowed in part regarding the admissibility of LOAs.
13	UEQ v UEP: Division of Matrimonial Assets - Treatment of Gifts under Women's Charter 31 Jul 2019 UEQ (Appellant)Partial	31 Jul 2019	UEQ (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Wife ordered to refund $78,152.10 to the Husband.
14	Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor Negligence 26 Mar 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in part in respect of the defects the court found Orion-One and Sanchoon to be liable for. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	GPE Pte Ltd v Siemens Pte Ltd: Construction Law, Damages for Defects & Delay 05 Sep 2018 GPE Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Sep 2018	GPE Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial Judgment for Plaintiff; Assessment OrderedJudgment for the plaintiff for work done for the 030 Project amounting to 60% of the original contract price ($432,573.48); assessment ordered for variation works and losses from idle time due to delays caused by the defendant for the Jangkrik and 103 Projects. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Automatic Controls v Tan Thiam Soon: Conspiracy and Conversion Claims 09 Apr 2017 Tan Thiam Soon (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2017	Tan Thiam Soon (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment granted to the Plaintiff against the first defendant for conspiracy and conversion, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Tunas Pte Ltd v Management Corporation: Recovery of Legal Fees Dispute 07 Sep 2015 The Management Corporation Strata Title No 562 (Defendant)Lost	07 Sep 2015	The Management Corporation Strata Title No 562 (Defendant): Orders against DefendantThe defendant had wrongfully refused to withdraw the Writ of Seizure and Sale and the Management Corporation Charge. The defendant was not entitled to payment of $20,647.90 before discharging the instruments. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
18	Diora-Ace Ltd v Management Corporation: Enforcing Notice under BMSMA to Prevent Incurring Legal Costs 01 Apr 2015 I.Contemporary Living Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Apr 2015	I.Contemporary Living Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ application dismissed with costs of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Ng Kek Wee v Sim City Technology: Minority Shareholder Rights & Corporate Mismanagement 08 Sep 2014 Ng Kek Wee (Appellant)Won	08 Sep 2014	Ng Kek Wee (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the orders made by the Judge were set aside.
20	Sim City Technology v Ng Kek Wee: Minority Oppression & Director's Breach of Duty 22 Oct 2013 Chan Mun Kong (Defendant)Won	22 Oct 2013	Chan Mun Kong (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Chan Mun Kong was dismissed.
21	Teo Siew Ngoh v Ng Hock Huat: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 18 Apr 2013 Ng Hock Huat (Defendant)Lost	18 Apr 2013	Ng Hock Huat (Defendant): Orders made against DefendantHusband was ordered to sell the matrimonial property, pay the Wife a lump sum of $180,000 in lieu of periodic maintenance, and an additional $58,500 from his other assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Moh Seng Cranes v Hup Hin: Crane Damage Due to Worksite Negligence 10 Dec 2012 Hup Hin Transport Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Dec 2012	Hup Hin Transport Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant was dismissed; the first defendant’s costs on an indemnity basis are to be agreed or taxed and borne by second defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Jurong Town Corp v Dauphin Shipyard: Summary Judgment for Land Possession After Lease Expiry 03 Sep 2012 Dauphin Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Sep 2012	Dauphin Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedSummary judgment granted against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Sheng Siong v Carilla: Lease Agreement Dispute over Supermarket Use Approval 13 Sep 2011 Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Sep 2011	Sheng Siong Supermarket Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for the return of the security deposit and legal fee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	Hong Investment v Tai Thong Hung: Application to Remove Liquidators for Cause 27 Dec 2010 Hong Investment Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Won	27 Dec 2010	Hong Investment Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Application GrantedApplication to remove liquidators granted.