Lim Joe Jee

Lim Joe Jee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and inter vivos gift. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and minority oppression.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Joe Jee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Joe Jee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms(Apr 2023) Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Company Voluntary Winding Up(Apr 2022) Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low: Transfer of Oppression Action Appeal Due to Company Insolvency(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Joe Jee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	34.5 parties avg	4.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	44.4 parties avg	4.4
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Joe Jee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,297,856.41	432,618.803 cases	3
USD	5,000,000.00	5,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	4 112	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v DyStar: Breach of Contract, Res Judicata & Certainty of Terms 13 Apr 2023 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Neutral	13 Apr 2023	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedDyStar's appeal (CA 58) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low Tuck Loong: Oppression of Minority Shareholders in Company Voluntary Winding Up 11 Apr 2022 Wei Fengpin (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2022	Wei Fengpin (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; Low and Sim shall be jointly and severally liable to buyout Wei’s shares at US$5m.
3	Wei Fengpin v Raymond Low: Transfer of Oppression Action Appeal Due to Company Insolvency 06 Dec 2021 Wei Fengpin (Applicant)Neutral	06 Dec 2021	Wei Fengpin (Applicant): Appeal transferred to Court of AppealAppeal transferred from the Appellate Division to the Court of Appeal.
4	DyStar v Kiri: Breach of Contract & Res Judicata in Shareholder Agreement 23 Sep 2021 DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Sep 2021	DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; DyStar awarded costs of SGD 1,137,856.41 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Soemarto Sulistio v Stukan Yetty Fang: Inter Vivos Gift of Gold Bars & Constructive Trusts Dispute 22 Jul 2021 Sulistio Edy (Respondent, Defendant)Won	22 Jul 2021	Sulistio Edy (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs of S$40,000 from the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond: Oppression of Minority Shareholder Claim 14 Apr 2021 Wei Fengpin (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Apr 2021	Wei Fengpin (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartThe court found that the Defendants had engaged in oppressive conduct and ordered Low and Sim to make restitution to the company for the improperly received dividends and bonuses.