Lim Jun Hao Alvin

Lim Jun Hao Alvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and trademarks. Their track record shows a 11.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory derivative action	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Discharge Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jun Hao Alvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Jun Hao Alvin has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action for Breach of Directors' Duties(Dec 2022) Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action & Cross-Examination(Sep 2022) Cheong v Sim: Director's Duties & Minority Shareholder Oppression in Car Leasing(Mar 2022)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	Dr. Babor v Sante De Beaute: Groundless Threat of Trade Mark Infringement(Jul 2018)
Ravindran Associates LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Invalidity of Luke's Lobster Trade Marks(Jul 2021)
Chevalier Law LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order(Jun 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	13% of cases	Hoya Corp v Asahi Glass Co Ltd: Patent Infringement Dispute over Glass Lens Rim(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Jun Hao Alvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 5 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Lost	45.7 parties avg	5.7	50%
Partial	23.3 parties avg	3.3	25%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2024	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Jun Hao Alvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(11%)	11%
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Withdrawn	1(11%)	11%
Won	1(11%)	11%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	140,000.00	28,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order 25 Jun 2024 Dowser Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jun 2024	Dowser Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Fine ImposedFine of $20,000 imposed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action for Breach of Directors' Duties 06 Dec 2022 Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Dec 2022	Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication for leave to bring a derivative action in the name of the Company granted in part against Wavoo, but not Latiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Syed Ibrahim v Wavoo Abdusalam: Statutory Derivative Action & Cross-Examination 19 Sep 2022 Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Sep 2022	Syed Ibrahim Shaik Mohideen (Plaintiff): Application to cross-examine plaintiff deniedThe plaintiff successfully opposed the defendants' application for leave to cross-examine him.
4	Cheong v Sim: Director's Duties & Minority Shareholder Oppression in Car Leasing 31 Mar 2022 David Cheong Hong Meng (Plaintiff)Won	31 Mar 2022	David Cheong Hong Meng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had acted oppressively and in disregard of his interests as a shareholder.
5	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute over 'Luke's' Restaurant Name 17 Feb 2022 Luke’s Tavern Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	17 Feb 2022	Luke’s Tavern Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellants to bear the respondents’ costs fixed at $50,000 all-in (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	TMRG Pte Ltd v Caerus Holding Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off & Invalidity of Luke's Lobster Trade Marks 12 Jul 2021 Luke’s Tavern Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Jul 2021	Luke’s Tavern Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims for trade mark infringement, passing off, and invalidation of the Luke's Lobster trade marks are dismissed.
7	Dr. Babor v Sante De Beaute: Groundless Threat of Trade Mark Infringement 11 Jul 2018 His Bounty Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Dismissed	11 Jul 2018	His Bounty Associates Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedSante De Beaute's claim in groundless threat against His Bounty Associates Pte Ltd fails.
8	Hoya Corp v Asahi Glass Co Ltd: Patent Infringement Dispute over Glass Lens Rim 13 Jan 2010 Others (Defendant)Partial	13 Jan 2010	Others (Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the order allowing the amendment of the statement of claim was dismissed. Appeal against the order for further discovery was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.