DLT v Thampi: Civil Contempt & Sentencing for Disobeying Data Deletion Order

In Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) Pte Ltd and Dowser Group Pte Ltd v Suji Mannattu Thampi and others, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore addressed the consequences of disobeying a discharge order. The plaintiffs, Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) Pte Ltd and Dowser Group Pte Ltd, were found in contempt of court for retaining and using data that they were ordered to irretrievably delete. The court imposed fines on the plaintiffs, as well as Mr. Patel and Mr. Neji, for their roles in the contempt.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Fines imposed on all four contempt respondents: Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) Pte Ltd, Dowser Group Pte Ltd, Suji Mannattu Thampi, Sheravathy Suji Thampi, Samir Vinodray Makwana, Thiyagarajan Athmanathan, Sevnic Pte Ltd (formerly known as Digital Vyuh Pte Ltd), Intellidocx Asia Pte Ltd, Atulkumar Nanjibhai Patel, and Samir Salim Neji.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Plaintiffs DLT and Dowser, Mr. Patel, and Mr. Neji found in contempt for disobeying data deletion order. Fines imposed for retaining and using data.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationFine ImposedLost
Dowser Group Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationFine ImposedLost
Suji Mannattu ThampiDefendantIndividualCosts AwardedWon
Sheravathy Suji ThampiDefendantIndividualNeutralNeutral
Samir Vinodray MakwanaDefendantIndividualNeutralNeutral
Thiyagarajan AthmanathanDefendantIndividualNeutralNeutral
Sevnic Pte Ltd (formerly known as Digital Vyuh Pte Ltd)DefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral
Intellidocx Asia Pte LtdDefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral
Atulkumar Nanjibhai PatelOtherIndividualFine ImposedLost
Samir Salim NejiOtherIndividualFine ImposedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andre ManiamJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs obtained a search order on 25 September 2020, which was varied on 7 October 2020.
  2. The search order was discharged on 3 December 2020 due to material non-disclosure.
  3. The discharge order required the plaintiffs to irretrievably delete data obtained by the search.
  4. Plaintiffs filed affidavits on 14 January 2021 confirming irretrievable deletion of the affected defendants’ data.
  5. Mr. Nikhil Joshi sent an email with a spreadsheet containing data obtained by the search to Mr. Neji, Mr. Gala, and Mr. Patel on 28 April 2021.
  6. Mr. Patel used the spreadsheet to draft paragraphs of his Affidavit of Evidence-In-Chief.
  7. Mr. Patel initially denied using the spreadsheet but later admitted to it.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) Pte Ltd and anothervSuji Mannattu Thampi and others, Suit No 903 of 2020 (Summons 3724 of 2023), [2024] SGHC 148

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Search order obtained
Search order varied
Search order discharged
Affidavits filed confirming irretrievable deletion of data
Email sent by Mr. Nikhil Joshi with spreadsheet attached
Mr. Patel’s Affidavit of Evidence-In-Chief affirmed
First defendant applied for paragraphs of Mr. Patel’s AEIC to be struck out
Mr. Patel filed a reply affidavit
Plaintiffs' lawyers asked about aide memoires
P1 disclosed to court
Hearing of the first defendant’s application for contempt
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Civil Contempt
    • Outcome: The court found the plaintiffs, Mr. Patel, and Mr. Neji to be in contempt of court.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Disobedience of Court Order
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiffs disobeyed the discharge order by retaining and using data they were ordered to delete.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Fines
  2. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Contempt of Court

10. Practice Areas

  • Civil Contempt
  • Sentencing

11. Industries

  • Technology
  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Mok Kah Hong v Zheng Zhuan YaoSingapore Court of AppealYes[2016] 3 SLR 1SingaporeCited for principles of sentencing for contempt.
PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd and othersSingapore Court of AppealYes[2018] 4 SLR 828SingaporeCited for principles of sentencing for contempt.
Sembcorp Marine Ltd v Aurol Anthony SebastianSingapore High CourtYes[2013] 1 SLR 245SingaporeCited for principles of sentencing for contempt.
Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng and anotherSingapore High CourtYes[2021] SGHC 282SingaporeCompared to the present case to justify not imposing a custodial sentence.
Baker, Michael A v BCS Business Consulting ServicesSingapore Court of AppealYes[2024] 3 SLR 302SingaporeCompared to the present case to justify not imposing a custodial sentence.
Neo Chin Heng v Good Year Contractor Pte LtdSingapore High CourtYes[2024] SGHC 52SingaporeCompared to the present case to determine the appropriate fine.
Summit Holdings and another v Business Software AllianceSingapore Court of AppealYes[1999] 2 SLR (R) 592SingaporeDistinguished from the present case regarding the nature of the breach.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (2020 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Discharge order
  • Search order
  • Irretrievable deletion
  • Material non-disclosure
  • Contempt of court
  • Affidavit of Evidence-In-Chief
  • Data retention

15.2 Keywords

  • Contempt
  • Data deletion
  • Search order
  • Singapore
  • Civil procedure
  • Fines
  • Imprisonment

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contempt of Court
  • Civil Procedure
  • Data Protection