Lim Jun Heng

Lim Jun Heng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil litigation and summary judgment. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Heng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Jun Heng has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Audent Chambers LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties(Sep 2024) Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions(Sep 2024) Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Jun Heng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	23.8 parties avg	3.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	43.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Jun Heng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	10,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties 04 Sep 2024 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	04 Sep 2024	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.
2	Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions 01 Sep 2024 Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd (Claimant, Respondent)Won	01 Sep 2024	Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Eurofins awarded costs of $20,000 plus disbursements of $483.95 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Sentek Marine v MPA Singapore: Judicial Review of Bunkering License Non-Renewal 26 Aug 2024 Sentek Marine & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	26 Aug 2024	Sentek Marine & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedSentek's application for judicial review of the MPA's decision not to renew its bunkering licenses was dismissed.
4	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings 24 Apr 2024 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Apr 2024	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiffs' application allowed, for the sole purpose of allowing the Hong Kong Court to determine whether there had been a breach of its court order in HCA 1469/2019. Costs here and below are reserved to the trial judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.