True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties
In True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore addressed the quantification of losses suffered by True Yoga Pte Ltd, True Fitness (STC) Pte Ltd, and True Fitness Pte Ltd (collectively, "True Group (Singapore)") due to the defendant Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng's breach of contractual and director's duties. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, determined that the historical benchmark should be used to assess damages, covering a 12-month period from July 2017 to June 2018, and instructed the parties to agree on the final value of the losses based on the court's parameters.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Assessment of damages for breach of fiduciary and contractual duties. The court adopted the historical benchmark to quantify losses.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True Yoga Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment. | Neutral | |
True Fitness (STC) Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment. | Neutral | |
True Fitness Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment. | Neutral | |
Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng | Defendant | Individual | Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment. | Neutral |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The plaintiffs are Singapore companies operating gymnasiums and fitness centres.
- The defendant was the former Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group from 19 March 2008 until 9 May 2018.
- The defendant was found liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties.
- True Group (Thailand) ceased operations on 9 June 2017.
- True Group (Malaysia) ceased operations on 10 June 2017.
- The plaintiffs' losses are financial loss arising from damage to the brand equity of the ‘True’ brand.
- The court adopted the plaintiffs’ time period of 12 months from July 2017 to June 2018 for the quantification exercise.
5. Formal Citations
- True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, Suit No 376 of 2019, [2024] SGHC 228
- True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, , [2022] SGHC 155
- Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and others, , [2023] 2 SLR 323
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Defendant appointed as Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group | |
True Group (Thailand) ceased operations | |
True Group (Malaysia) ceased operations | |
Plaintiffs replaced the 24-months Term Membership with two separate memberships of one year each | |
DBS terminated its IPP service with the plaintiffs | |
Dues Plus Membership effective from this date | |
Term Membership discontinued from this date | |
Defendant ceased to be the Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group | |
Defendant ceased to be the director of the plaintiffs | |
Judgment in True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John [2022] SGHC 155 | |
Judgment in Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and others [2023] 2 SLR 323 | |
Joint expert statement dated | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contractual Duties
- Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his contractual duties.
- Category: Substantive
- Breach of Director's Duties
- Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his director's duties.
- Category: Substantive
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his fiduciary duty.
- Category: Substantive
- Quantification of Damages
- Outcome: The court determined that the historical benchmark should be used to assess damages, covering a 12-month period from July 2017 to June 2018.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Breach of Director's Duties
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Fitness
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John | High Court | Yes | [2022] SGHC 155 | Singapore | Cited for the finding that the defendant was liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties. |
Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and others | Unknown | Yes | [2023] 2 SLR 323 | Singapore | Cited for the finding that the defendant was liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties. |
Credit Suisse Trust Limited v Ivanishvili, Bidzina and others | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2024] SGCA(I) 5 | Singapore | Cited for the principles regarding the burden of proof in equitable compensation claims for breach of fiduciary duty. |
Sim Poh Ping v Winsta Holding Pte Ltd and another and other appeals | Unknown | Yes | [2020] 1 SLR 1199 | Singapore | Cited for the principles regarding the burden of proof in equitable compensation claims for breach of fiduciary duty. |
Loo Chay Sit v Estate of Loo Chay Loo, deceased | Unknown | Yes | [2010] 1 SLR 286 | Singapore | Cited regarding the evidential burden in cases where there is no linkage between the fiduciary’s breach and the losses sustained. |
Continental Steel Pte Ltd v Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Southeast Asia Pte Ltd and another | Unknown | Yes | [2023] 5 SLR 445 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a fall in demand cannot be used to determine the period of loss unless it had been established that the fall in demand was wholly caused by the damage to reputation. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Cash Sales
- Budget Benchmark
- Historical Benchmark
- EFT Income
- Term Membership
- Dues Membership
- Dues Plus Membership
- Revitalisation Business Plan
- IPPs
15.2 Keywords
- breach of contract
- breach of director's duties
- breach of fiduciary duty
- damages
- assessment
- brand equity
- fitness centre
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Damages Assessment | 95 |
Fiduciary Duties | 90 |
Director's Liability | 80 |
Breach of Contract | 75 |
Commercial Disputes | 60 |
Corporate Litigation | 50 |
Business Litigation | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Corporate Law
- Damages