True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties

In True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore addressed the quantification of losses suffered by True Yoga Pte Ltd, True Fitness (STC) Pte Ltd, and True Fitness Pte Ltd (collectively, "True Group (Singapore)") due to the defendant Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng's breach of contractual and director's duties. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, determined that the historical benchmark should be used to assess damages, covering a 12-month period from July 2017 to June 2018, and instructed the parties to agree on the final value of the losses based on the court's parameters.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Assessment of damages for breach of fiduciary and contractual duties. The court adopted the historical benchmark to quantify losses.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
True Yoga Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationParties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Neutral
True Fitness (STC) Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationParties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Neutral
True Fitness Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationParties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Neutral
Patrick John Wee Ewe SengDefendantIndividualParties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Neutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiffs are Singapore companies operating gymnasiums and fitness centres.
  2. The defendant was the former Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group from 19 March 2008 until 9 May 2018.
  3. The defendant was found liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties.
  4. True Group (Thailand) ceased operations on 9 June 2017.
  5. True Group (Malaysia) ceased operations on 10 June 2017.
  6. The plaintiffs' losses are financial loss arising from damage to the brand equity of the ‘True’ brand.
  7. The court adopted the plaintiffs’ time period of 12 months from July 2017 to June 2018 for the quantification exercise.

5. Formal Citations

  1. True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, Suit No 376 of 2019, [2024] SGHC 228
  2. True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John, , [2022] SGHC 155
  3. Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and others, , [2023] 2 SLR 323

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defendant appointed as Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group
True Group (Thailand) ceased operations
True Group (Malaysia) ceased operations
Plaintiffs replaced the 24-months Term Membership with two separate memberships of one year each
DBS terminated its IPP service with the plaintiffs
Dues Plus Membership effective from this date
Term Membership discontinued from this date
Defendant ceased to be the Group Chief Executive Officer of True Group
Defendant ceased to be the director of the plaintiffs
Judgment in True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John [2022] SGHC 155
Judgment in Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and others [2023] 2 SLR 323
Joint expert statement dated
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contractual Duties
    • Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his contractual duties.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Breach of Director's Duties
    • Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his director's duties.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Outcome: The defendant was found liable for breach of his fiduciary duty.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Quantification of Damages
    • Outcome: The court determined that the historical benchmark should be used to assess damages, covering a 12-month period from July 2017 to June 2018.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Breach of Director's Duties
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Fitness

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
True Yoga Pte Ltd and others v Wee Ewe Seng Patrick JohnHigh CourtYes[2022] SGHC 155SingaporeCited for the finding that the defendant was liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties.
Wee Ewe Seng Patrick John v True Yoga Pte Ltd and othersUnknownYes[2023] 2 SLR 323SingaporeCited for the finding that the defendant was liable in breach of his contractual duties and director’s duties.
Credit Suisse Trust Limited v Ivanishvili, Bidzina and othersCourt of AppealYes[2024] SGCA(I) 5SingaporeCited for the principles regarding the burden of proof in equitable compensation claims for breach of fiduciary duty.
Sim Poh Ping v Winsta Holding Pte Ltd and another and other appealsUnknownYes[2020] 1 SLR 1199SingaporeCited for the principles regarding the burden of proof in equitable compensation claims for breach of fiduciary duty.
Loo Chay Sit v Estate of Loo Chay Loo, deceasedUnknownYes[2010] 1 SLR 286SingaporeCited regarding the evidential burden in cases where there is no linkage between the fiduciary’s breach and the losses sustained.
Continental Steel Pte Ltd v Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Southeast Asia Pte Ltd and anotherUnknownYes[2023] 5 SLR 445SingaporeCited for the principle that a fall in demand cannot be used to determine the period of loss unless it had been established that the fall in demand was wholly caused by the damage to reputation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Cash Sales
  • Budget Benchmark
  • Historical Benchmark
  • EFT Income
  • Term Membership
  • Dues Membership
  • Dues Plus Membership
  • Revitalisation Business Plan
  • IPPs

15.2 Keywords

  • breach of contract
  • breach of director's duties
  • breach of fiduciary duty
  • damages
  • assessment
  • brand equity
  • fitness centre

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Damages