Lim Jun Rui Ivan

Lim Jun Rui Ivan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and disciplinary proceedings. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Due Diligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Algorithmic Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pre-action Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Norwich Pharmacal Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contingency Fee Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Jun Rui Ivan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Jun Rui Ivan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	8 cases	100% of cases	Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement(Sep 2024) Lim Chang Huat v Stronghold Global Holdings: Breach of Contract and Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence(Sep 2023) CWP v CWQ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Dredging Work Stoppages(Mar 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Jun Rui Ivan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Partial	42.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Jun Rui Ivan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Partial	4(50%)	50%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	82,000.00	20,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement 09 Sep 2024 Maybank Singapore Limited (Respondent)Won	09 Sep 2024	Maybank Singapore Limited (Respondent): Favorable rulingCosts of $2,000 awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Chang Huat v Stronghold Global Holdings: Breach of Contract and Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence 12 Sep 2023 Stronghold Global Holdings Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	12 Sep 2023	Stronghold Global Holdings Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; awarded costs fixed at $80,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	CWP v CWQ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Dredging Work Stoppages 15 Mar 2023 CWP (Claimant)Lost	15 Mar 2023	CWP (Claimant): Application DismissedClaimant's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
4	First Property Holdings v U Myo Nyunt: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Delay 17 Dec 2020 First Property Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Dec 2020	First Property Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe court set aside the Default Judgment for the liquidated sum of US$585,143.67 and dismissed the rest of the defendant’s appeal against the AR’s decision. The court also dismissed the defendant’s application to set aside the Assessment Judgment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Quoine Pte Ltd v B2C2 Ltd: Algorithmic Trading, Unilateral Mistake & Cryptocurrency 23 Feb 2020 Quoine Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	23 Feb 2020	Quoine Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part, appeal allowed in partAppeal dismissed regarding the breach of contract claim; appeal allowed regarding the breach of trust claim.
6	Croesus Retail Trust Restructuring: Court's Guidance on Trust Scheme under Order 80 of the Rules of Court 07 Aug 2017 Croesus Retail Asset Management Pte. Ltd. (Applicant)Partial	07 Aug 2017	Croesus Retail Asset Management Pte. Ltd. (Applicant): Orders granted in partOrders granted for convening a meeting of unit holders and a further hearing by the court regarding the Trust Scheme. Determination of whether the proposed amendments to the Trust Deed were within the powers of amendment conferred by the Trust Deed and the Business Trusts Act deferred until the further hearing.
7	Intas Pharmaceuticals v DealStreetAsia: Pre-Action Disclosure & Discovery in Malicious Falsehood Claim 09 Apr 2017 INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	09 Apr 2017	INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partPlaintiff's appeal allowed in part, granting leave to serve limited interrogatories concerning the nature of DealStreetAsia's sources.
8	Law Society of Singapore v Lau See Jin Jeffrey: Disciplinary Proceedings for Contingency Fee Agreement 19 Feb 2017 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	19 Feb 2017	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application grantedThe Law Society's application for sanctions against the Respondent was granted.