Lim Ming Yi

Lim Ming Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Tribunal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Supply of Goods	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Ming Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Ming Yi has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore(Dec 2008) Comfort Resources v Alliance Concrete: Breach of Sand Supply Contract Dispute(Aug 2008)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	25% of cases	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment(Mar 2013)
I.N.C. Law LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Darcet Pte Ltd v Schweizer Energy Production: Misrepresentation & Oral Contract Dispute(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Ming Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	19.0 parties avg	9.0	25%
Won	33.4 parties avg	3.4	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Ming Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	163,696.67	54,565.563 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Darcet Pte Ltd v Schweizer Energy Production: Misrepresentation & Oral Contract Dispute 29 Jan 2020 Pang Yoke Lee (Defendant)Won	29 Jan 2020	Pang Yoke Lee (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Manjit Singh v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Appointment 13 Mar 2013 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2013	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants ordered to pay half the costs of the appeal to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 Samsung Total Petrochemical Co Ltd (Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2008	Samsung Total Petrochemical Co Ltd (Respondent): Opposition unsuccessfulOpposition to the winding up application was unsuccessful.
4	Comfort Resources v Alliance Concrete: Breach of Sand Supply Contract Dispute 04 Aug 2008 Comfort Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Aug 2008	Comfort Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal judgment awarded to Comfort Resources in the amount of $163,696.67 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). Interlocutory judgment also awarded for breach of contract, with damages to be assessed.