Lim Shack Keong

Lim Shack Keong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and quistclose trusts. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Electrical Engineering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Related Party Transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Functional Completion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Completion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Shack Keong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Shack Keong has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	36% of cases	Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Stay of Proceedings & Forum Non Conveniens in Defamation Claim(Dec 2009) Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Defamation Claim Stayed Pending Malaysian Proceedings(Apr 2009) Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests: Minority Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute(Nov 2008)
Legis Point LLC	3 cases	27% of cases	Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust(Nov 2018) Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai: Dispute over Legal Fee Agreement and Interpretation of 'Hard Cap' Clause(Dec 2017) Sakae Holdings Ltd v Gryphon Real Estate: Oppression of Minority Shareholders & Director's Fiduciary Duties(May 2017)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	9% of cases	AOF v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Sexual Offences(Apr 2012)
Colin Ng and Partners	1 cases	9% of cases	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005)
Peter Moe and Partners	1 cases	9% of cases	Hi-Amp Engineering v Technicdelta: Labour Supply Contract Dispute for MRT Stations(Dec 2003)
Peter Moe & Partners	1 cases	9% of cases	Goh Kim Heong v AT & J Co Pte Ltd: Property Sale Dispute over Completion Payments(Sep 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Shack Keong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (36%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.8 parties avg	4.8	36%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	18%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	9%
Won	43.5 parties avg	3.5	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	27.5 parties avg	7.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Shack Keong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(36%)	36%
Neutral	2(18%)	18%
Partial	1(9%)	9%
Won	4(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	363,130.88	51,875.847 cases	7
USD	380,511.71	380,511.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust 26 Nov 2018 Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff): NeutralFiled interpleader action; no direct win or loss.
2	Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai: Dispute over Legal Fee Agreement and Interpretation of 'Hard Cap' Clause 27 Dec 2017 Legis Point LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2017	Legis Point LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sakae Holdings Ltd v Gryphon Real Estate: Oppression of Minority Shareholders & Director's Fiduciary Duties 03 May 2017 Ho Yew Kong (Defendant)Lost	03 May 2017	Ho Yew Kong (Defendant): Unsuccessful in defending the claimsHo Yew Kong was unsuccessful in defending the claims against him.
4	AOF v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Sexual Offences 17 Apr 2012 AOF (Appellant)Won	17 Apr 2012	AOF (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant's appeal was allowed and he was acquitted of all charges.
5	Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Stay of Proceedings & Forum Non Conveniens in Defamation Claim 10 Dec 2009 Chan Chee Chiu (Respondent)Won	10 Dec 2009	Chan Chee Chiu (Respondent): Appeal Against Stay AllowedAppeal against stay of proceedings allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung: Defamation Claim Stayed Pending Malaysian Proceedings 20 Apr 2009 Chan Chee Chiu (Defendant, Appellant)Won	20 Apr 2009	Chan Chee Chiu (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal to stay the proceedings in Singapore was allowed.
7	Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests: Minority Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute 30 Nov 2008 Richvein Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	30 Nov 2008	Richvein Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Richvein Pte Ltd, the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
8	Sitt Tatt Bhd v Goh Tai Hock: Breach of Trust and Contract Dispute over Oil & Gas Project Funding 25 Nov 2008 Sitt Tatt Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2008	Sitt Tatt Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of US$380,511.71, comprised of US$350,511.71 and US$30,000, plus interest and costs.
9	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Esys Distribution Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	25 Apr 2005	Esys Distribution Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Application allowed in partApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages allowed in part in the amount of S$315,646 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Hi-Amp Engineering v Technicdelta: Labour Supply Contract Dispute for MRT Stations 30 Dec 2003 Technicdelta Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2003	Technicdelta Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Goh Kim Heong v AT & J Co Pte Ltd: Property Sale Dispute over Completion Payments 14 Sep 2001 AT & J Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2001	AT & J Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; ordered to refund $47,484.88 to the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.