Lin Shumin

Lin Shumin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in natural justice and judicial review. Their track record shows a 37.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lin Shumin has demonstrated expertise across 88 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Treaty Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registration of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investment Schemes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Scheme	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Alternative Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Communications and Media	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Regulatory Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lin Shumin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lin Shumin has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	17 cases	89% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution(Aug 2024) Lutfi Salim bin Talib v British and Malaysian Trustees: Specific Production & Common Interest Privilege(Mar 2024) Deutsche Telekom AG v. Republic of India: BIT, Arbitration, State Immunity, Enforcement of Award(Jan 2023)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom AG: Arbitration Confidentiality & Privacy(Jun 2023)
Drew & Napier	1 cases	5% of cases	OpenNet v. Info-Communications: Appeal for Judicial Review Dismissal(Mar 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lin Shumin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 3 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.2 parties avg	2.2	26%
Neutral	36.0 parties avg	6.0	16%
Partial	42.8 parties avg	2.8	21%
Won	73.1 parties avg	3.1	37%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	25.5 parties avg	5.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lin Shumin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(26%)	26%
Neutral	3(16%)	16%
Partial	4(21%)	21%
Won	7(37%)	37%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	137,240.00	12,476.3611 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution 07 Aug 2024 Zayed bin Abdul Aziz Talib (Respondent)Neutral	07 Aug 2024	Zayed bin Abdul Aziz Talib (Respondent): Application SupportedApplication supported. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lutfi Salim bin Talib v British and Malaysian Trustees: Specific Production & Common Interest Privilege 24 Mar 2024 Zayed bin Abdul Aziz Talib (Claimant)Partial	24 Mar 2024	Zayed bin Abdul Aziz Talib (Claimant): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partAppeal allowed in part and dismissed in part; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom AG: Arbitration Confidentiality & Privacy 08 Jun 2023 The Republic of India (Applicant)Lost	08 Jun 2023	The Republic of India (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for the Appeal and any other applications that may be filed in connection with it to be heard in private was dismissed.
4	Deutsche Telekom AG v. Republic of India: BIT, Arbitration, State Immunity, Enforcement of Award 29 Jan 2023 The Republic of India (Defendant)Lost	29 Jan 2023	The Republic of India (Defendant): Applications dismissedSUM 155, SUM 24, SUM 45 and SUM 720 are dismissed. India bears DT’s costs of SUM 155, SUM 24 and SUM 45. There will be no order as to the costs of SUM 720. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	CNX v CNY: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Against Foreign State under International Arbitration Act 13 Mar 2022 CNY (Defendant)Partial	13 Mar 2022	CNY (Defendant): Extension of time to set aside Leave Order allowed in partDefendant was allowed until 2022-01-11 to apply to set aside the Leave Order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	CAJ v CAI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 10 Nov 2021 CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	10 Nov 2021	CAI (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldThe Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the portion of the arbitral award relating to the extension of time.
7	CAI v CAJ: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute 28 Jan 2021 CAI (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Jan 2021	CAI (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication to set aside the Tribunal’s decision to grant the defendants an extension of time of 25 days for the delay in Mechanical Completion was allowed.
8	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Mareva Injunction in Investment Scheme Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Ho Sally (Defendant)Won	02 Jul 2020	Ho Sally (Defendant): Application DismissedThe application for a Mareva injunction against the defendant was dismissed.
9	Ng Siok Poh v Sim Lian-Koru Bena JV Pte Ltd: Damages for Nuisance & Negligence from Construction 02 Jul 2018 LIM HONG LIU (SUING IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LIM LIAN CHIAT, DECEASED) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 Jul 2018	LIM HONG LIU (SUING IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LIM LIAN CHIAT, DECEASED) (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, awarding $50,000 for loss of amenity and $18,620 for the cost of replacing doors. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Elbow Holdings Pte Ltd v Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd: Injunctions & Breach of Contract Dispute 08 May 2016 MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Defendant)Neutral	08 May 2016	MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Defendant): CounterclaimThe defendant filed a counterclaim for arrears in rent.
11	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Recovery of Dividends & Share Ownership Dispute 11 Mar 2015 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Mar 2015	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed regarding the existence of a settlement agreement. The court found that a settlement agreement existed but was repudiated by the other party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Dispute over SinCo Technologies Dividends and Share Transfer 15 Apr 2014 Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2014	Lim Jit Ming Bryan's Wife (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	OpenNet v. Info-Communications: Appeal for Judicial Review Dismissal 13 Mar 2013 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	13 Mar 2013	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to strike out the notice of appeal dismissed.
14	Re Andrews Geraldine Mary QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore 14 Nov 2012 Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant)Neutral	14 Nov 2012	Teo Soo Geok Josephine (Defendant): Application OpposedDefendant opposed the application for ad hoc admission.
15	OpenNet v IDA: Judicial Review of IDA's Decision on NetLink Trust's Compliance with Control and Ownership Requirements 23 Aug 2012 Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2012	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
16	Sim Hok Khun v Henry Budi Harsono: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Trust over Jardine Matheson Shares 10 Apr 2012 Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong (Defendant)Won	10 Apr 2012	Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong (Defendant): Stay of Proceedings GrantedDefendant's application for a stay of proceedings on the ground of forum non conveniens was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Alternative Pleading 17 Nov 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent)Lost	17 Nov 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the respondent to pay half of the appellant's costs of the present appeal. There will be no order as to costs with regard to the proceedings before the Judge and the AR. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Amendment of Statement of Claim & Settlement Agreement Dispute 15 May 2011 Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 May 2011	Lim Jit Ming Bryan (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's appeal.
19	Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan: Striking Out 'Without Prejudice' Communications in Trust Dispute 28 Jan 2010 Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Josephine Teo Soo Geok (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to strike out paragraphs in the Statement of Claim and affidavit was granted.