Sim Hok Khun v Henry Budi Harsono: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Trust over Jardine Matheson Shares
In Sim Hok Khun @ Hadi Gunawan v Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong, the Singapore High Court considered the defendant's application for a stay of proceedings based on forum non conveniens. The plaintiff, Sim Hok Khun, sued the defendant, Henry Budi Harsono, for breach of trust, claiming the defendant held Jardine Matheson shares on trust for him. The defendant argued Hong Kong was a more appropriate forum, as the shares were allegedly part of a Sim Family Trust Fund. The court, presided over by Assistant Registrar Jordan Tan, granted the stay, finding Hong Kong a more appropriate forum due to the trust's connection to Hong Kong and ongoing proceedings there.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Defendant's application to stay this action on the ground of forum non conveniens granted.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court stayed proceedings in Singapore, finding Hong Kong a more appropriate forum to adjudicate a breach of trust claim involving Jardine Matheson shares.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sim Hok Khun @ Hadi Gunawan | Plaintiff | Individual | Application Dismissed | Lost | |
Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong | Defendant | Individual | Stay of Proceedings Granted | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Jordan Tan | Assistant Registrar | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Plaintiff and defendant are brothers.
- Plaintiff sued defendant for breach of trust regarding Jardine Matheson shares.
- Defendant claimed the shares were part of a Sim Family Trust Fund.
- Defendant applied for a stay of proceedings based on forum non conveniens.
- The Jardine shares were sold from a Hong Kong custody account.
- The Trust concerned various Hong Kong assets and was managed in Hong Kong.
5. Formal Citations
- Sim Hok Khun @ Hadi Gunawan v Henry Budi Harsono @ Sim Hok Kiong, Suit No 8 of 2012/T (Summons No 642 of 2012/Q), [2012] SGHCR 1
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Writ of summons filed | |
Defendant entered an appearance | |
Defendant filed Summons 324 of 2012 for an extension of time to file his defence | |
Consent order recorded before an Assistant Registrar | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Forum Non Conveniens
- Outcome: The court granted the stay of proceedings, finding Hong Kong to be the more appropriate forum.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [1987] AC 460
- Breach of Trust
- Outcome: The court did not rule on the merits of the breach of trust claim, as the proceedings were stayed.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Declaration that defendant held shares on trust
- Account of the shares
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Trust
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd | N/A | Yes | [1987] AC 460 | N/A | Cited for the test to determine forum non conveniens. |
Yeoh Poh San and another v Won Siok Wan | N/A | No | [2002] 2 SLR(R) 233 | Singapore | Cited regarding the requirement to apply for a stay of proceedings before taking any step other than filing an appearance. |
Chan Chin Cheung v Chan Fatt Cheung and others | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2010] 1 SLR 1192 | Singapore | Cited to support the argument that a defendant is entitled to apply for a stay even after filing a defence. |
Jio Minerals FZC and others v Mineral Enterprises Ltd | N/A | Yes | [2011] 1 SLR 391 | Singapore | Cited for the requirements of the Spiliada test. |
Murakami Takako (executrix of the estate of Takashi Murakami Suroso, deceased) v Wiryadi Louise Maria and others | N/A | Yes | [2009] 1 SLR(R) 508 | Singapore | Cited for the requirements of the Spiliada test. |
The “Rainbow Joy” | N/A | Yes | [2005] 3 SLR(R) 719 | Singapore | Cited regarding the issue of whether there was a viable defence to the claim was not a relevant consideration as the court should not be required to go into the merits. |
The “Reecon Wolf” | High Court | Yes | [2012] SGHC 22 | Singapore | Cited as another factor militating for a stay. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Order 12 Rule 7(1) of the Rules of Court |
Order 12 Rule 7(2) of the Rules of Court |
Order 18 Rule 2 of the Rules of Court |
Order 3 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Forum Non Conveniens
- Breach of Trust
- Jardine Matheson Shares
- Sim Family Trust Fund
- Stay of Proceedings
- Connecting Factors
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
15.2 Keywords
- forum non conveniens
- breach of trust
- Singapore
- Hong Kong
- stay of proceedings
- Jardine Matheson
- trust fund
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Forum Non Conveniens | 90 |
Trust Law | 75 |
Jurisdiction | 60 |
Civil Procedure | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Litigation
- Trusts
- Jurisdiction