Ling Tien Wah

Ling Tien Wah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	16 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	12 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distress Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveat	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distress for Rent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stakeholding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Meetings Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Management Councils	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Writ of Distress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of oral agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crime of Passion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Workover Pulling Unit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charter Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oil and Gas Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Management Consultancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Secret Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Franchises and Franchising	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ling Tien Wah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ling Tien Wah has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	13 cases	59% of cases	Khor Liang Ing Grace v Nie Jianmin: Caveat Removal in Probate Dispute over Alleged Loan(Oct 2014) KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses(Feb 2014) Cupid Jewels v Orchard Central: Distress Act & Promissory Estoppel in Rental Arrears Dispute(Jan 2014)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	14% of cases	Lau Soon v UOL Development: Stakeholding Sum Dispute & Limitation Act(Aug 2021) Chan Sze Ying v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948: Adjournment of AGM & Election of Management Council(Apr 2020) SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd v Strait Colonies Pte Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Lease Agreement(Oct 2017)
Rodyk & Davidson	3 cases	14% of cases	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Secret Trusts & Estate Distribution Dispute(Nov 2007) Soh Beng Tee v Fairmount: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(May 2007) Fairmount Development v. Soh Beng Tee: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2006)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	5% of cases	Strait Colonies v SMRT Alpha: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Lease Agreement(Jul 2018)
Rodyk and Davidson	1 cases	5% of cases	Norsiah binte Samat v Neo Poh Guan: Rescission of Property Sale Agreement Due to Road Reserve(Oct 2003)
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	Flagship Agencies v BBQ Express: Franchise Agreement Dispute over Opt-Out Clause and Damages(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ling Tien Wah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 3 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.2 parties avg	3.2	23%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	145.8 parties avg	5.8	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	510.3 parties avg	10.3
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ling Tien Wah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(23%)	23%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Won	14(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,809,920.66	414,994.3314 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lau Soon v UOL Development: Stakeholding Sum Dispute & Limitation Act 18 Aug 2021 UOL Development (Dakota) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	18 Aug 2021	UOL Development (Dakota) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; stakeholding sum of S$64,450 to be released to them (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chan Sze Ying v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2948: Adjournment of AGM & Election of Management Council 28 Apr 2020 Lee Chuen T’ng (Intervener)Neutral	28 Apr 2020	Lee Chuen T’ng (Intervener): Application DismissedThe intervener's position was upheld as the application was dismissed.
3	Strait Colonies v SMRT Alpha: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Lease Agreement 03 Jul 2018 SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2018	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent for $562,441.31 being outstanding rent and interest as at 1 October 2015, with interest at 12% per year on the principal sum of $538,942.94 from 1 October 2015 until payment, and $2,155,294.02 being damages with interest at 5.33% per year from the date of the writ until judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd v Strait Colonies Pte Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Lease Agreement 02 Oct 2017 SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2017	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for $562,441.31 being outstanding rent and interest as of 1 October 2015 together with interest at 12% per annum on the principal sum of $538,942.94 from 1 October 2015 until payment, and $2,155,294.02 being damages together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ until judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Khor Liang Ing Grace v Nie Jianmin: Caveat Removal in Probate Dispute over Alleged Loan 12 Oct 2014 Khor Liang Ing Grace (executor of the estate of Tan See Wee, deceased) (Applicant)Won	12 Oct 2014	Khor Liang Ing Grace (executor of the estate of Tan See Wee, deceased) (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication to strike off the caveat was allowed.
6	KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses 25 Feb 2014 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Lost	25 Feb 2014	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; BRE's claim against KSE was unsuccessful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Cupid Jewels v Orchard Central: Distress Act & Promissory Estoppel in Rental Arrears Dispute 12 Jan 2014 Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2014	Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Orchard Central awarded the costs of CA 32 and the costs of Cupid Jewels’ application below on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	BR Energy v KS Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement for WPU Construction 19 Mar 2013 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Mar 2013	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff on liabilityJudgment in favour of BRE on liability with costs. BRE's claim for damages is to be assessed by the Registrar. The question of interest, if any, is also reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Orchard Central v Cupid Jewels: Distress Act, Rental Arrears & Promissory Estoppel 21 Feb 2013 Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	21 Feb 2013	Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications DismissedBoth Cupid Jewels' and Forever Jewels' applications were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Cupid Jewels v Orchard Central: Distress Act & Tenant's Right to Recover Seized Jewellery 10 Apr 2011 Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	10 Apr 2011	Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal partially overturnedThe appeal was allowed to the extent that Cupid Jewels’ application be restored and heard on the merits. The original costs order was varied to be in the cause.
11	Orchard Central v Cupid Jewels: Distress Writ & Ownership of Seized Jewellery 07 Oct 2010 Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Oct 2010	Orchard Central Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedPlaintiff's application for a writ of distress was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Yickvi Realty v Pacific Rover: Easement Dispute over Road Realignment 17 Sep 2009 Pacific Rover Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	17 Sep 2009	Pacific Rover Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Pacific Rover was allowed to realign the road, subject to an undertaking to allow Yickvi access for maintenance. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Cove Development v Ideal Accommodation: Judgment on Admission for Recovery of Grangeford Property 15 Jul 2009 Cove Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2009	Cove Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for possession of the premises. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Will Construction, Testamentary Trust, Testator's Intention 23 Jun 2009 Ng Hock Guan (Respondent)Lost	23 Jun 2009	Ng Hock Guan (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe court found that the Testator did not intend to leave the Estate to Sebastian absolutely as the sole beneficiary. The Testator intended to leave the Estate to Sebastian on trust for those of the Testator’s family members who are entitled to a share of the Estate pursuant to s 7, rr 2 and 3 of the Intestate Succession Act (Cap 146, 1985 Rev Ed).
15	Pacific Rover v Yickvi Realty: Easement Realignment & Injunctive Relief 17 Mar 2009 Pacific Rover Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Mar 2009	Pacific Rover Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDeclaration granted that Yickvi Realty had no right to injunctive relief over the proposed realignment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Leong Soh Har Michael v Kek Beng: Collective Sale Cost Allocation Dispute 12 Jan 2009 Tee Kam Chi (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jan 2009	Tee Kam Chi (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiffs' application allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
17	Michael de Kretser Consultants v De Kretser: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Employment Contract 07 May 2008 Michael William Rose (Defendant)Lost	07 May 2008	Michael William Rose (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants, and further order that damages be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Secret Trusts & Estate Distribution Dispute 21 Nov 2007 Ng Hock Guan (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2007	Ng Hock Guan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims against the defendant dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Soh Beng Tee v Fairmount: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 08 May 2007 Fairmount Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	08 May 2007	Fairmount Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Fairmount Development Pte Ltd to bear the costs of the appeal.
20	Fairmount Development v. Soh Beng Tee: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice 16 Oct 2006 Fairmount Development Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	16 Oct 2006	Fairmount Development Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application grantedApplication granted with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Norsiah binte Samat v Neo Poh Guan: Rescission of Property Sale Agreement Due to Road Reserve 22 Oct 2003 Norsiah binte Samat (Plaintiff)Won	22 Oct 2003	Norsiah binte Samat (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedDeclaration granted for the plaintiff to rescind the agreement; defendants ordered to repay the deposit of $310,000 with interest at 4% p.a. from 17 December 2002. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Flagship Agencies v BBQ Express: Franchise Agreement Dispute over Opt-Out Clause and Damages 12 Aug 2001 BBQ Express Pte Ltd (formerly known as Meadowbake Delicatessen Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	12 Aug 2001	BBQ Express Pte Ltd (formerly known as Meadowbake Delicatessen Pte Ltd) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartThe defendant's appeal was dismissed in part; the order was varied for clarity.