Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Will Construction, Testamentary Trust, Testator's Intention
The Court of Appeal heard an appeal by Low Ah Cheow, Ng Puay Guan, Ng Bee Eng, Ng Jian Wen, and Nicholas Ng Zhi Kai against Ng Hock Guan concerning the construction of the will of the late Ng Teow Yhee. The appellants claimed that Ng Hock Guan held the residuary estate on secret trusts for their benefit. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, finding that the testator's intention was to create a trust for his immediate family, to be distributed according to intestacy rules, rather than an absolute gift to Ng Hock Guan. The court affirmed the High Court's decision that the estate was not subject to the specific pleaded trusts.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Court of Appeal1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding will construction. The court determined the testator's intention was to create a trust for his family, not an absolute gift.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ng Bee Eng | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
Low Ah Cheow | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
Ng Puay Guan | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
Ng Jian Wen | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
Nicholas Ng Zhi Kai | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | |
Ng Hock Guan | Respondent | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chan Sek Keong | Chief Justice | No |
Andrew Phang Boon Leong | Justice of the Court of Appeal | No |
V K Rajah | Justice of the Court of Appeal | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The testator, Ng Teow Yhee, passed away on 12 April 2001.
- The testator executed a will on 27 November 2000, appointing his third son, Ng Hock Guan (Sebastian), as his sole executor and trustee.
- The will stated that the estate was to be held "ON TRUST to be distributed to" Sebastian.
- The testator's assets were largely tied up in two family companies.
- The testator had eight children and a wife, Low Ah Cheow.
- The appellants claimed that Sebastian was merely a trustee and that the estate was subject to specific trusts in their favor.
- The High Court dismissed the appellants' claims, holding that Sebastian took the estate absolutely.
5. Formal Citations
- Low Ah Cheow and Others v Ng Hock Guan, CA 150/2007, SUM 2086/2008, 2792/2008, [2009] SGCA 25
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Will executed | |
Testator passed away | |
Sebastian applied for probate of the Will | |
Grant of probate made | |
Suit commenced against Sebastian | |
Appellants filed fourth amended statement of claim | |
Appellants filed summons seeking leave to amend the Statement of Claim | |
Appellants filed another summons seeking leave to further amend the Statement of Claim | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Construction of Will
- Outcome: The court held that the testator's intention was to create a trust for his immediate family, not an absolute gift to the respondent.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Ambiguity in will
- Testator's intention
- Interpretation of 'on trust'
- Validity of Testamentary Trust
- Outcome: The court found that a trust where the sole trustee is also the sole beneficiary cannot exist in law.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Sole trustee appointed sole beneficiary
- Legal difficulties in trust terms
8. Remedies Sought
- Declaration that Ng Hock Guan is only a trustee
- Declaration that the Estate is subject to trusts in accordance with the Testator’s wishes
- Determination of the terms of the trusts created by the Testator
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Trust
- Declaration of Trust
10. Practice Areas
- Probate
- Estate Planning
- Trusts
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan | High Court | Yes | [2007] SGHC 200 | Singapore | The High Court decision that the appellants had not proved that the Testator’s residuary estate was subject to secret trusts in their favour was referenced. |
Perrin v. Morgan | N/A | Yes | [1943] AC 399 | N/A | Cited for the principle that the court must ascertain the testator's intention as expressed in the will. |
Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff v Syed Salim Alhadad | N/A | Yes | [1996] 3 SLR 410 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that when an executor has completed administration, he stands in the position of a trustee in relation to the residuary estate. |
Lie Hendri Rusli v Wong Tan & Molly Lim | N/A | Yes | [2004] 4 SLR 594 | Singapore | Cited regarding adverse inferences against a drafting solicitor for failing to keep proper attendance notes. |
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Phuay Khiang | N/A | Yes | [2007] 3 SLR 477 | Singapore | Cited regarding adverse inferences against a drafting solicitor for failing to keep proper attendance notes. |
Wong Kai Woon v Wong Kong Hom | N/A | Yes | [2000] 1 SLR 546 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court will not adopt a construction that leads to an irrational and capricious result. |
Re Chionh Ke Hu Decd | N/A | Yes | [1964] MLJ 270 | N/A | Cited for the presumption that a testator did not intend to die either totally or partly intestate. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Wills Act (Cap 352, 1996 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Intestate Succession Act (Cap 146, 1985 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Testamentary trust
- Secret trust
- Will construction
- Testator's intention
- Residuary estate
- Executor
- Trustee
- Beneficiary
- Intestacy
- Wei tok
- Distribution
- Moral obligation
- Legal obligation
15.2 Keywords
- Will
- Trust
- Estate
- Succession
- Singapore
- Family
- Intention
- Construction
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Succession Law | 95 |
Wills | 95 |
Will Interpretation | 90 |
Trust Law | 80 |
Estate Administration | 75 |
Testamentary Trust | 70 |
Contract Law | 30 |
Undue Influence | 20 |
Evidence Law | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Wills and Estates
- Trusts
- Succession