Lok Vi Ming SC

Lok Vi Ming SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in appellate practice and undue influence. Their track record shows a 35.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 56% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated expertise across 96 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marital Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policy Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Genetic Affinity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
IVF Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Birth	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement on roll of advocates and solicitors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hit and Run	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of Goods by Air and Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lok Vi Ming SC has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LVM Law Chambers LLC	13 cases	72% of cases	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case(Nov 2024) Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Appeal on Costs Decision and Requirements for Permission to Appeal(Nov 2023) Tan Siew Hui v Lim Lai Soon: Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Family-Owned Companies(Oct 2023)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	22% of cases	ACB v Thomson Medical: Negligence, IVF Error, and Upkeep Claim(Jan 2015) Law Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Company(Oct 2008) Gnaguru v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors(Feb 2008)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	6% of cases	Sun Tech v FedEx: Hijacking & Bailee's Duty of Care in Air Carriage(Apr 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lok Vi Ming SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 10 (56%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.4 parties avg	3.4	39%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	11%
Partial	44.6 parties avg	4.6	22%
Won	75.5 parties avg	5.5	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	25.7 parties avg	5.7
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lok Vi Ming SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(35%)	35%
Neutral	2(10%)	10%
Partial	4(20%)	20%
Won	7(35%)	35%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	3,571.437 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Henderson Doctrine & Abuse of Process in Solicitor Conflict Case 24 Nov 2024 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2024	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Henderson doctrine was inapplicable, and there was no general abuse of process.
2	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Appeal on Costs Decision and Requirements for Permission to Appeal 16 Nov 2023 Chan Pik Sun (Applicant)Partial	16 Nov 2023	Chan Pik Sun (Applicant): Permission to appeal the Costs Decision grantedThe court granted the applicant permission to appeal the Costs Decision.
3	Tan Siew Hui v Lim Lai Soon: Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Family-Owned Companies 09 Oct 2023 Lim Lai Soon (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2023	Lim Lai Soon (Respondent): Orders upheld in entiretyThe Judge’s orders were upheld in entirety in these appeals.
4	CYE v CYF: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Energy Trading Dispute 28 Sep 2023 CYE (Claimant)Lost	28 Sep 2023	CYE (Claimant): Application DismissedClaimant's application to set aside the Final Award is dismissed.
5	Lim Oon Kuin v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out & Amendments in Hin Leong & Ocean Tankers Cases 14 Aug 2023 Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2023	Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Enjin Pte Ltd v Pritchard Lilia: Marital Privilege, Oral Agreements & Cryptocurrency 21 Aug 2022 Pritchard Lilia (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2022	Pritchard Lilia (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedMs Pritchard’s counterclaim was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Wei Ho-Hung v Lyu Jun: Appeal on Gifts, Resulting Trusts, and Quistclose Trusts in Unmarried Couple's Dispute 18 Aug 2022 Lyu Jun (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Aug 2022	Lyu Jun (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment varied in partJudgment varied to reduce the amount Wei Ho-Hung was ordered to repay by S$40,000. Costs of S$45,000 awarded to Lyu Jun.
8	UWF v UWH: Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in Will Dispute 21 Dec 2020 UWG (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Dec 2020	UWG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed.
9	Silverlink Resorts v MS First Capital: Scope of Arbitration Agreement & Stay of Proceedings 15 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal seeking a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The court ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs of the appeal fixed at $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed by me if not agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
10	LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 02 Apr 2020 Chan Pik Sun (Other)Neutral	02 Apr 2020	Chan Pik Sun (Other): NeutralThe outcome for Ms. Chan is neutral in this appeal, as the court allowed her lawyers to continue representing her. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Thio Keng Thay v Sandy Island Pte Ltd: Construction Defects, Breach of Contract, Defamation 25 Jul 2019 Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	25 Jul 2019	Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Breach of contract claim lost in partJudgment against the Defendant on the breach of contract claim, with the quantum of damages to be determined at a later stage. The court found that the defendant breached the SPA because the Property contained both general defects and lift defects. Monetary amount to be determined in the second tranche of the trial. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh: Undue Influence, Estate Assets, and Interim Injunction 17 Jun 2018 Sia Tze Ming (Non-party)Won	17 Jun 2018	Sia Tze Ming (Non-party): Intervention AllowedMs. Sia was permitted to intervene in the action for the restricted purposes of dealing with the interim injunction application, any application to vary or discharge the interim injunction, as well as any appeal arising from the interim injunction application or the application to intervene.
13	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 LIU CHENG CHAN (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant)Partial	16 Jan 2018	LIU CHENG CHAN (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	ACB v Thomson Medical: Negligence, IVF Error, and Upkeep Claim 14 Jan 2015 Chia Choy May (Defendant)Won	14 Jan 2015	Chia Choy May (Defendant): Upkeep claim dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the child's upkeep.
15	Law Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Company 29 Oct 2008 Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2008	Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Successful in striking out claimDefendants' application to strike out paragraphs 22 to 28 and prayer 12 of the Statement of Claim was granted.
16	Gnaguru v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 28 Feb 2008 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	28 Feb 2008	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society initially objected but withdrew its objection after the applicant agreed to certain conditions. No order as to costs was made as neither the Attorney-General nor the Law Society had sought costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Public Prosecutor v Lee Meng Soon: Drink Driving & Failure to Render Assistance Sentencing 13 Aug 2007 Lee Meng Soon (Respondent)Lost	13 Aug 2007	Lee Meng Soon (Respondent): Sentence increased for drink drivingSentence for drink driving increased to two weeks' imprisonment and a three-year disqualification.
18	Sun Tech v FedEx: Hijacking & Bailee's Duty of Care in Air Carriage 19 Apr 2006 Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2006	Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd, dismissing the plaintiff's claim with costs.