Loo Dip Seng

Loo Dip Seng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 35.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 12% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and shipping law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bailment	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Good seamanship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clauses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time-Bar	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tonnage limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Seaworthiness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bill of Lading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Towage Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability Clauses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formwork System	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warehousing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collision Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Loo Dip Seng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Loo Dip Seng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	14 cases	82% of cases	AS Fortuna Opco BV v Sea Consortium: Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims(Apr 2020) Arctic Bridge v Tian E Zuo: Collision in Singapore Waters - Negligence & Maritime Conventions Act(Apr 2018) Jurong Port v Huationg: Indemnity Clauses & Negligence Liability(Jun 2009)
Ang and Partners	3 cases	18% of cases	Antara Koh v Eng Tou: Limitation of Liability for Shipowner under Merchant Shipping Act(Sep 2005) Schaar & Niemeyer v Acrux Shipping: Arrest of Vessel for Failure to Pay, Admiralty Jurisdiction(Sep 2004) Royal Global Exports v Good Stream: Mareva Injunction Variation for Debt Payment(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loo Dip Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (12%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.1 parties avg	2.1	47%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	6%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	12%
Won	63.4 parties avg	3.4	35%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loo Dip Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(47%)	47%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	2(12%)	12%
Won	6(35%)	35%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1
SGD	1,962,000.00	196,200.0010 cases	10
USD	154,056.00	154,056.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AS Fortuna Opco BV v Sea Consortium: Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 13 Apr 2020 Ocean Network Express Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	13 Apr 2020	Ocean Network Express Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralDid not contest the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to limit liability and constitute a limitation fund.
2	Arctic Bridge v Tian E Zuo: Collision in Singapore Waters - Negligence & Maritime Conventions Act 19 Apr 2018 THE OWNERS AND/OR THE DEMISE CHARTERERS OF AND/OR OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP OR VESSEL “TIAN E ZUO” (Defendant)Partial	19 Apr 2018	THE OWNERS AND/OR THE DEMISE CHARTERERS OF AND/OR OTHER PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE SHIP OR VESSEL “TIAN E ZUO” (Defendant): PartialResponsibility for the collision divided equally (50/50) between both vessels. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Jurong Port v Huationg: Indemnity Clauses & Negligence Liability 25 Jun 2009 Jurong Port Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	25 Jun 2009	Jurong Port Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Jurong Port's claim for indemnity was rejected. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Tort of Deceit & Summary Judgment in Loan Disbursement Dispute 20 Oct 2008 Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Oct 2008	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant, Appellant): Summary judgment grantedSummary judgment granted to the plaintiff in its claim against the 2nd defendant, with a variation of the judgment sum. The judgment sum was reduced by the net sales proceeds of the 26 machines recovered and sold by the plaintiff. Interest was ordered at 5.33% per annum on the sum of $1.94m from the date of disbursement of the loan until the date of sale of the 26 machines and thereafter on the net amount after deduction of the net sales proceeds. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	PT Soonlee v Synergy Shipping: Unseaworthy Barge & Liability for Lost Cargo 26 Jul 2007 PT Soonlee Metalindo Perkasa (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Jul 2007	PT Soonlee Metalindo Perkasa (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, but liability limited to £30,000.
6	Agritrade International Pte Ltd v Pacific Vigorous Shipping Inc: Misdelivery of Cargo & Election of Remedies 08 Jun 2006 AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jun 2006	AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAgritrade's appeal was allowed with costs fixed at $22,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Antara Koh v Eng Tou: Limitation of Liability for Shipowner under Merchant Shipping Act 04 Sep 2005 Eng Tou Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Sep 2005	Eng Tou Offshore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Successful defense against limitation actionEng Tou successfully defended against Antara Koh's limitation action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Schaar & Niemeyer v Acrux Shipping: Arrest of Vessel for Failure to Pay, Admiralty Jurisdiction 06 Sep 2004 Schaar & Niemeyer (Far East) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2004	Schaar & Niemeyer (Far East) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
9	Royal Global Exports v Good Stream: Mareva Injunction Variation for Debt Payment 11 Aug 2004 Trustrade Enterprises Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Aug 2004	Trustrade Enterprises Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application AllowedSecond defendant's application to vary the Mareva order was allowed, permitting Good Stream to pay its debts to Trustrade out of the insurance proceeds.
10	Bentimi Pte Ltd: Winding Up Petition Based on Disputed Debt and Alleged Improper Business Conduct 14 Apr 2003 In the Matter of Part X of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (1994 Revised Edition) (Petitioner)Lost	14 Apr 2003	In the Matter of Part X of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 (1994 Revised Edition) (Petitioner): Petition dismissed with costsPetition to wind up Bentimi Pte Ltd was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	APL Co Pte Ltd v Voss Peer: Straight Bills of Lading & Delivery Obligations 02 Oct 2002 APL Co Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2002	APL Co Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Security for costs paid out to the respondent's solicitors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	ASL Power: Title to Goods, Bills of Lading & C&F Contracts Dispute 28 Jul 2002 Capitol Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2002	Capitol Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Rapiscan Asia v Global Container: Bill of Lading, Contract Terms & Negligence in Shipping 15 Apr 2002 Global Container Freight Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	15 Apr 2002	Global Container Freight Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$154,056 with interest. Assumed USD, as Rapiscan is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an American company.
14	Thyssen Hynnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd v TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd: Formwork Contract Dispute 03 Feb 2002 TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Feb 2002	TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interlocutory judgment entered against defendantInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant regarding the formwork not returned by the defendant, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Concordia Agritrading v Cornelder Hoogewerff: Time Bar in Warehousing Conditions 29 Aug 2001 Cornelder Hoogewerff (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2001	Cornelder Hoogewerff (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Steelmet v APL Co: Title to Goods, Bills of Lading & Right to Sue for Conversion 26 Nov 2000 P & O Nedlloyd B V (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2000	P & O Nedlloyd B V (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantDefendants' application to strike out the plaintiffs' statement of claim was successful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Kohap (Hong Kong) Ltd v Sea Sources Trading: Conversion Claim Over Marine Gas Oil 30 May 2000 Kohap (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 May 2000	Kohap (Hong Kong) Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for conversion was dismissed.