Low Hong Quan

Low Hong Quan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Hong Quan has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Agents Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disbursements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Hong Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Hong Quan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fervent Chambers LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Chen Qiming v Huttons Asia: Misrepresentation, Estate Agents Act & Property Purchase Dispute(Apr 2024) Chia Soo Kiang v Tan Tock Seng Hospital: Indemnity Costs for Dismissed Medical Negligence Claim(Mar 2023) DSL Integrated Solution v Triumph Electrical: Subcontract Termination Dispute(Sep 2022)
Silvester Legal LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	VJP v VJQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Exclusion on Appeal(Aug 2021) CLI v CLJ: Appeal for Shared Care and Control of Child Rejected(Jun 2021) VJQ v VJP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Hong Quan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Hong Quan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,199,365.73	439,873.155 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chen Qiming v Huttons Asia: Misrepresentation, Estate Agents Act & Property Purchase Dispute 16 Apr 2024 Chen Qiming (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Apr 2024	Chen Qiming (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for S$1,544,100, representing 30% of the property's sale price, was dismissed. The court found no basis for the claims of misrepresentation, breach of contract, negligence, or breach of statutory duty. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
2	Chia Soo Kiang v Tan Tock Seng Hospital: Indemnity Costs for Dismissed Medical Negligence Claim 09 Mar 2023 Chia Soo Kiang (personal representative of the estate of Tan Yaw Lan, deceased) (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Mar 2023	Chia Soo Kiang (personal representative of the estate of Tan Yaw Lan, deceased) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $600,000 and disbursements to the defendants on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	DSL Integrated Solution v Triumph Electrical: Subcontract Termination Dispute 14 Sep 2022 Triumph Electrical System Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 Sep 2022	Triumph Electrical System Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partThe Defendant is entitled to claim for 92% of the value of the work done prior to its termination of the works on 22 May 2021. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	VJP v VJQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Exclusion on Appeal 11 Aug 2021 VJP (Appellant)Won	11 Aug 2021	VJP (Appellant): Appeal AllowedWife is entitled to 44.8% of the reduced matrimonial pool, resulting in an additional $52,665.73.
5	CLI v CLJ: Appeal for Shared Care and Control of Child Rejected 09 Jun 2021 CLI (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	09 Jun 2021	CLI (Applicant, Appellant): Application for leave to appeal dismissedHusband's application for leave to appeal was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs of $2,600 inclusive of disbursements to the wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	VJQ v VJP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 28 Sep 2020 VJP (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	28 Sep 2020	VJP (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe sum of $140,000 being the purchase price of the Primefield shares was excluded from the matrimonial assets. The sum of $176,250 being the sum of the undisbursed housing loan for the Botanique apartment was excluded from the matrimonial assets, with liberty to apply in the event that the loan is not disbursed. The children’s monthly maintenance is payable on the 3rd instead of the 23rd of each month.