Luke Lee

Luke Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 42% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Luke Lee has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	11 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Murder	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Luke Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Luke Lee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Luke Lee & Co	10 cases	83% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2018) PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016) Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng: Amendment of Consent Judgment & Division of HDB Flat Proceeds(Feb 2013)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	8% of cases	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention(Sep 2000)
Luke Lee and Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Yeow Ban Soon: Rape and Hurt Charges in Domestic Violence Context(Apr 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Luke Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 5 (42%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	93.2 parties avg	3.2	75%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	8%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2002	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Luke Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(75%)	75%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Withdrawn	1(8%)	8%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Ramdhan bin Lajis: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Apr 2018 Steve Crocker (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Steve Crocker (Defendant): Guilty verdict
2	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Selamat bin Paki (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Selamat bin Paki (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
3	Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng: Amendment of Consent Judgment & Division of HDB Flat Proceeds 05 Feb 2013 Ng Bee Eng (Defendant)Neutral	05 Feb 2013	Ng Bee Eng (Defendant): Order to standCourt made no order on SUM 4094/2012, which sought an order for the Consent Judgment to stand. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Public Prosecutor v Yeow Ban Soon: Rape and Hurt Charges in Domestic Violence Context 12 Apr 2004 Yeow Ban Soon (Defense)Won	12 Apr 2004	Yeow Ban Soon (Defense): Accused acquitted of rape chargesAccused acquitted of rape charges.
5	PP v Tan Chun Seng: Provocation Defence in Murder Case 27 Feb 2003 Tan Chun Seng (Defense)Lost	27 Feb 2003	Tan Chun Seng (Defense): Accused convicted and sentenced to deathThe accused was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
6	Public Prosecutor v Ramli bin Ismail: Trafficking of Diamorphine 05 Nov 2002 Ramli bin Ismail (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2002	Ramli bin Ismail (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted as charged and sentenced to suffer death.
7	Amran Bin Eusuff v PP: Drug Trafficking, Entrapment, & Admissibility of Confessions 31 Mar 2002 Amran Bin Eusuff (Appellant)Lost	31 Mar 2002	Amran Bin Eusuff (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
8	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined 06 Mar 2002 WAN KAMIL BIN MD SHAFIAN (Appellant)Withdrawn	06 Mar 2002	WAN KAMIL BIN MD SHAFIAN (Appellant): Appeal WithdrawnThe first appellant withdrew his appeal.
9	PP v Amran bin Eusuff: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Dec 2001 Amran Bin Eusuff (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2001	Amran Bin Eusuff (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
10	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 IBRAHIM BIN MOHD (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2001	IBRAHIM BIN MOHD (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of murder under section 302 read with section 34 of the Penal Code and sentenced accordingly.
11	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 06 Sep 2000 Suboh bin Ramli (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2000	Suboh bin Ramli (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted on the amended charge of trafficking alone in the drugs.
12	Loganatha Venkatesan v PP: Conspiracy to Commit Murder & Admissibility of Police Statements 14 Aug 2000 Loganatha Venkatesan (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2000	Loganatha Venkatesan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was dismissed.