Lye Yu Min

Lye Yu Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lye Yu Min has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and insolvency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Actions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Creditors Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lye Yu Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lye Yu Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Re Boldtek Holdings Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application Under IRDA(Apr 2024) Re Logistics Construction: Judicial Management, Competing Nominations for Interim Judicial Manager(Mar 2024) SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act(Sep 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lye Yu Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	311.0 parties avg	11.0	60%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	211.0 parties avg	11.0
2024	29.5 parties avg	9.5
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lye Yu Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SME Care v Chan Siew Lee: Bankruptcy, Directors' Duties & Proof of Debt 18 Feb 2025 Fulcrum Distressed Partners Limited (Claimant)Won	18 Feb 2025	Fulcrum Distressed Partners Limited (Claimant): Application AllowedThe court found that Fulcrum Distressed Partners Limited's claim in respect of the TL Sum and the Finished Goods Sum should be admitted. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Re Boldtek Holdings Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application Under IRDA 07 Apr 2024 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Other)Neutral	07 Apr 2024	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Other): NeutralOversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited was a creditor of Boldtek Holdings Limited.
3	Re Logistics Construction: Judicial Management, Competing Nominations for Interim Judicial Manager 03 Mar 2024 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Other)Neutral	03 Mar 2024	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Other): NeutralOversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited was present as a creditor.
4	SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act 28 Sep 2023 Coca-Cola Sabco (East Africa) Limited (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2023	Coca-Cola Sabco (East Africa) Limited (Defendant): Appeal AllowedPlaintiffs' application to amend the Statement of Claim was denied.
5	Logistics Construction Pte Ltd Scheme of Arrangement: Moratorium Application 17 Aug 2023 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent)Neutral	17 Aug 2023	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent): Support for MoratoriumOversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited indicated support for a six-month moratorium.