Mahendra Prasad Rai

Mahendra Prasad Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and measure of damages. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated expertise across 55 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	9 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Expenses	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employers’ duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Employee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Special Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Worker Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Head Injuries	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mahendra Prasad Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mahendra Prasad Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cooma & Rai	12 cases	100% of cases	Lim Yew Beng v Lim Kwong Fei: Transfer of Proceedings to High Court(Sep 2024) Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract(Aug 2023) Sompo Insurance v Tay Jia Yi: Work Injury Compensation for Cardiac Arrest(May 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mahendra Prasad Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	42%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	17%
Won	53.8 parties avg	3.8	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mahendra Prasad Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(42%)	42%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	5(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	692,683.73	98,954.827 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Yew Beng v Lim Kwong Fei: Transfer of Proceedings to High Court 05 Sep 2024 Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	05 Sep 2024	Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): LostAppeal to transfer proceedings from District Court to High Court was allowed.
2	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract 03 Aug 2023 Lonpac Insurance Bhd (Respondent)Won	03 Aug 2023	Lonpac Insurance Bhd (Respondent): WonOrder for second respondent to be restrained from making payment to first respondent pursuant to the claim on the bond made on 29 July 2022.
3	Sompo Insurance v Tay Jia Yi: Work Injury Compensation for Cardiac Arrest 22 May 2022 SM Laundry & Linen Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Won	22 May 2022	SM Laundry & Linen Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe applicant's appeal was allowed, and the Assistant Commissioner's determination was set aside.
4	Soh Xia Kai Ronnie v Loke Chor Kay: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries 27 May 2019 Loke Chor Kay (Defendant)Lost	27 May 2019	Loke Chor Kay (Defendant): Costs on an indemnity basis fixed at $20,000.00 plus reasonable disbursements incurred from 15 May 2018 up to the date of the Final Judgment given on 10 January 2019.Costs on an indemnity basis fixed at $20,000.00 plus reasonable disbursements incurred from 15 May 2018 up to the date of the Final Judgment given on 10 January 2019 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Law Society of Singapore v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Grossly Improper Conduct 08 Apr 2019 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	08 Apr 2019	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Court found the respondent's conduct was grossly improper and unbefitting an advocate and solicitor. The appropriate sanction was a term of suspension of three years, and costs in the aggregate sum of S$10,000, inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by the respondent to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ng Siok Poh v Sim Lian-Koru Bena JV Pte Ltd: Damages for Nuisance & Negligence from Construction 02 Jul 2018 SIM LIAN-KORU BENA JV PTE LTD (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	02 Jul 2018	SIM LIAN-KORU BENA JV PTE LTD (Respondent, Defendant): Damages assessed using the Aesthetics MethodDamages assessed using the Aesthetics Method, and ordered to pay $50,000 for loss of amenity and $18,620 for the cost of replacing doors. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Minichit Bunhom v Jazali bin Kastari: Recovery of Medical Expenses for Foreign Worker in Negligence Claim 26 Apr 2018 Ergo Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Ergo Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Ergo Insurance Pte Ltd is liable for the medical expenses of $15,682.97, interests thereon at the rate and for the period stated above, and costs of the appeal fixed at $23,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ng Siok Poh v Sim Lian-Koru: Damages for Tort Affecting Land & Property 26 Sep 2017 SIM LIAN-KORU BENA JV PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	26 Sep 2017	SIM LIAN-KORU BENA JV PTE LTD (Defendant): Damages AssessedDefendant required to pay damages of $462,200.76. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Chua Peng Ho v Saravanan: Discontinuance of Suit Under Order 21 Rule 2(6) of the Rules of Court 02 May 2017 Saravanan A/L Subramaniam as dependent of the estate of Lingaswari A/P Koushanan (Deceased) (Respondent)Won	02 May 2017	Saravanan A/L Subramaniam as dependent of the estate of Lingaswari A/P Koushanan (Deceased) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Minichit Bunhom v Jazali bin Kastari: Special Damages & Employer's Duty under EFMA 06 Dec 2016 Ergo Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Dec 2016	Ergo Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment in favorThe respondent successfully argued against the appellant's claim for medical expenses.
11	Tan Yu Min Winston v Uni-Fruitveg: Head Injury Damages Assessment 31 Jul 2008 Uni-Fruitveg Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	31 Jul 2008	Uni-Fruitveg Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal partially unsuccessfulRequired to pay increased damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenities to $173,000.00, pre-trial transport expenses to $1,800.00, loss of earning capacity to $100,000.00, and future medical and transport expenses to $11,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Mohd Aslam v PP: Abetment of False Statement for Employment Pass - Mens Rea 15 Mar 2006 Mohd Aslam s/o Jahandad (Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2006	Mohd Aslam s/o Jahandad (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in respect of the first offence.