Mak Shin Yi

Mak Shin Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and international arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
State Immunity	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mak Shin Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mak Shin Yi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State(May 2017) BLY v BLZ & Another: Stay of Arbitration Proceedings under International Arbitration Act(Mar 2017) Josias Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Substituted Service on Foreign State under State Immunity Act(Mar 2017)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd: Minority Oppression & Third-Party Indemnity(Nov 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mak Shin Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.3 parties avg	4.3	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	54.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mak Shin Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	5 5	Lost: 5 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	EQ Capital Investments Ltd v Sunbreeze Group Investments Ltd: Minority Oppression & Third-Party Indemnity 01 Nov 2017 Kanchan Manoj Murjani (Defendant, Third Party Claimant)Lost	01 Nov 2017	Kanchan Manoj Murjani (Defendant, Third Party Claimant): LostThird party claim struck out.
2	Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Enforcement of Arbitral Award Against a State 07 May 2017 Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2017	Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to serve order per State Immunity Act.
3	BLY v BLZ & Another: Stay of Arbitration Proceedings under International Arbitration Act 26 Mar 2017 BLY (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Mar 2017	BLY (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application to stay the arbitration was dismissed.
4	Josias Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho: Substituted Service on Foreign State under State Immunity Act 13 Mar 2017 Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Mar 2017	Trustees of the Burmilla Trust (Plaintiff): Application for substituted service dismissedThe plaintiffs' application for substituted service was dismissed because the Enforcement Order must be served in accordance with the requirements in s 14(1) of the State Immunity Act.
5	L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation 08 Jan 2017 Jones the Grocer Group Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	08 Jan 2017	Jones the Grocer Group Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the court hearing the oppression action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Sanum Investments v. Government of Lao: Treaty Interpretation & Arbitration Jurisdiction 28 Sep 2016 Sanum Investments Limited (Appellant, Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2016	Sanum Investments Limited (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in CA 139/2015 and CA 167/2015Appeal allowed in CA 139/2015 and CA 167/2015. Costs of the High Court hearing and the appeal awarded to Sanum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).