Mak Wei Munn

Mak Wei Munn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical malpractice and medical negligence. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated expertise across 64 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and medical malpractice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Health Care	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pulmonary Fat Embolism	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liposuction Complications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Recoupment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustees Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mak Wei Munn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mak Wei Munn has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	10 cases	67% of cases	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution(Aug 2024) British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute(Sep 2022) Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure(Nov 2020)
Allen & Gledhill	4 cases	27% of cases	D’Conceicao v Tong: Medical Negligence, Redo CABG, Duty of Care(Aug 2011) Khoo James v Gunapathy: Medical Negligence, Bolam Test & Brain Tumour Radiosurgery(May 2002) Hendrawan Setiadi v OCBC Securities: Res Judicata & Striking Out Claims(Sep 2001)
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	7% of cases	Grossner Jens v Raffles Holdings: Brokerage Contract Dispute over Swissotel Acquisition(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mak Wei Munn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 9 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	25.3 parties avg	5.3	13%
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	13%
Partial	27.5 parties avg	7.5	13%
Won	93.6 parties avg	3.6	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2020	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2024	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mak Wei Munn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(13%)	13%
Lost	2(13%)	13%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	9(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,417.10	2,236.186 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Trust Income Recoupment & Distribution 07 Aug 2024 British and Malayan Trustees Ltd (Applicant)Won	07 Aug 2024	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedTrustees have the right to recoup the overpayments and sanctioning the terms of the Trustees’ plan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute 29 Sep 2022 British and Malayan Trustees Limited (Applicant)Partial	29 Sep 2022	British and Malayan Trustees Limited (Applicant): Application allowed in partThe court allowed the summons only in part, in that it made an order allowing the Group 1 Respondents to act as representatives of the 15 beneficiaries who have provided their express written consent to have their interests represented by the Group 1 Respondents.
3	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 25 Nov 2020 Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd (Third Party)Dismissed	25 Nov 2020	Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd (Third Party): Claim DismissedThird party claim against Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd was discontinued.
4	British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Lutfi Salim: Construction of Settlement for Income Distribution 19 Nov 2019 British and Malayan Trustees Limited (Applicant)Partial	19 Nov 2019	British and Malayan Trustees Limited (Applicant): Application partially successfulThe court adopted the branch interpretation, which was advocated by some of the respondents, but not the applicant.
5	Singapore Medical Council v Dr Soo Shuenn Chiang: Medical Professional Conduct & Patient Confidentiality 17 Oct 2019 Dr Soo Shuenn Chiang (Respondent)Won	17 Oct 2019	Dr Soo Shuenn Chiang (Respondent): Conviction Set AsideDr. Soo's conviction was set aside, and all orders made against him were reversed.
6	Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice 26 Jun 2017 ANG PENG TIAM (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2017	ANG PENG TIAM (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed.
7	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice 11 May 2017 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent)Won	11 May 2017	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test 21 Feb 2016 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2016	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the first defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
9	Ho Wah Nam v Tan Kim Siang Luke: Assessment of Damages for Cardiac Arrest During Stapedectomy 06 Nov 2012 Second defendant (Defendant)Lost	06 Nov 2012	Second defendant (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	D’Conceicao v Tong: Medical Negligence, Redo CABG, Duty of Care 21 Aug 2011 Tong Ming Chuan (Defendant)Won	21 Aug 2011	Tong Ming Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the defendant, with the plaintiff ordered to pay 85% of the defendant's costs.
11	Surender Singh v Li Man Kay: Medical Negligence in Kidney Donor Death 21 Jul 2009 Consigliere David Terence (Defendant)Dismissed	21 Jul 2009	Consigliere David Terence (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs’ claims against Dr. Consigliere David Terence dismissed with costs.
12	Grossner Jens v Raffles Holdings: Brokerage Contract Dispute over Swissotel Acquisition 27 Nov 2003 Raffles Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2003	Raffles Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Khoo James v Gunapathy: Medical Negligence, Bolam Test & Brain Tumour Radiosurgery 12 May 2002 Neurological Surgery Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 May 2002	Neurological Surgery Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was allowed.
14	Hendrawan Setiadi v OCBC Securities: Res Judicata & Striking Out Claims 30 Sep 2001 OCBC Securities Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2001	OCBC Securities Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Claim struck out upheldThe court upheld the decision to strike out the plaintiff's claim against OCBC Securities.
15	Hendrawan Setiadi v OCBC Securities: Res Judicata & Negligence Claim 30 Sep 2001 OCBC Securities Private Limited (Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2001	OCBC Securities Private Limited (Respondent): Claim Struck OutThe court upheld the decision to strike out the claim against OCBC Securities.