Manoj Nandwani

Manoj Nandwani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and criminal law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Privacy Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Protection from Harassment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rental Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Orders for protection	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equipment Rental	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dishonest Misappropriation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hire-Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manoj Nandwani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manoj Nandwani has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	8 cases	89% of cases	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, and Margin Calls in Silver Futures Trading(Jan 2024) Lai Kwok Kin v Teo Zien Jackson: Harassment Protection Order Appeal(May 2020) Mount Eastern v H&C S Holdings: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Iron Ore Supply Dispute(Jan 2016)
Shankar, Nandwani & Partners	1 cases	11% of cases	Teo Chin Leong Thomson v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Photocopier Rental Agreement Dispute(Jun 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manoj Nandwani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.6 parties avg	2.6	78%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manoj Nandwani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(78%)	78%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	1(11%)	11%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, and Margin Calls in Silver Futures Trading 23 Jan 2024 Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	23 Jan 2024	Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Claim DismissedAll claims of the plaintiff were dismissed.
2	Lai Kwok Kin v Teo Zien Jackson: Harassment Protection Order Appeal 11 May 2020 Lai Kwok Kin (Appellant)Lost	11 May 2020	Lai Kwok Kin (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs shall follow the event (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mount Eastern v H&C S Holdings: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Iron Ore Supply Dispute 11 Jan 2016 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2016	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Applications dismissedApplication to set aside the Award and appeal for extension of time were dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	H&C S Holdings v Mount Eastern: Interim Measures & Dissipation of Assets in Arbitration 20 Dec 2015 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	20 Dec 2015	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for interim measures dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Chia Kwok Yeo v Chia Hang Kiu: Property Sale Dispute over Medical Expenses and Alleged Family Trust 02 Oct 2014 Chia Hang Kiu (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2014	Chia Hang Kiu (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; the court ordered the sale of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Kishore Shewaram Mohinani v Padmabai: Rescission of Maintenance Order Based on Inheritance 23 Oct 2013 Kishore Shewaram Mohinani (Appellant)Partial	23 Oct 2013	Kishore Shewaram Mohinani (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe maintenance order was varied downwards from $2,000 to $1,000 per month.
7	Wong Seng Kwan v PP: Dishonest Misappropriation & Finder's Duties at Marina Bay Sands Casino 16 Apr 2012 Wong Seng Kwan (Appellant)Lost	16 Apr 2012	Wong Seng Kwan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for dishonest misappropriation was dismissed.
8	Kumar Rajaratnam v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravanamuthu: Discovery Obligations & Mutual Wills Dispute 22 Nov 2009 Rajaratnam Kumar (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	22 Nov 2009	Rajaratnam Kumar (Plaintiff, Respondent): Defence to Counterclaim Not Struck OutThe court dismissed the appeal to strike out the defence to counterclaim.
9	Teo Chin Leong Thomson v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Photocopier Rental Agreement Dispute 29 Jun 2000 Woo Poh Choon Doreen trading as Thomson Copy Service (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jun 2000	Woo Poh Choon Doreen trading as Thomson Copy Service (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; judgment for the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.