Teo Chin Leong Thomson v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Photocopier Rental Agreement Dispute

Teo Chin Leong Thomson and Woo Poh Choon Doreen, trading as Thomson Copy Service, sued Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd in the High Court of Singapore on 30 June 2000, alleging breach of a photocopier rental agreement. The plaintiffs claimed that the Fuji FX 5100 photocopier was not fit for purpose and that Fuji Xerox failed to remedy the situation. Fuji Xerox denied any breach and counterclaimed for outstanding rentals. Justice G P Selvam ruled in favor of Fuji Xerox, finding that the plaintiffs were responsible for the machine not being installed at their preferred location and awarded Fuji Xerox $223,506.92 on their counterclaim.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Defendant

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Thomson Copy Service sued Fuji Xerox for breach of contract over a photocopier rental agreement. The court found in favor of Fuji Xerox.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Teo Chin Leong ThomsonPlaintiffIndividualClaim DismissedLostManoj Nandwani, Renganathan Shankar
Woo Poh Choon Doreen trading as Thomson Copy ServicePlaintiffIndividualClaim DismissedLostManoj Nandwani, Renganathan Shankar
Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte LtdDefendantCorporationCounterclaim AllowedWonIan Chang, Desmond Ng

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
G P SelvamJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Manoj NandwaniShankar, Nandwani & Partners
Renganathan ShankarShankar, Nandwani & Partners
Ian ChangJimmy Harry & Partners
Desmond NgJimmy Harry & Partners

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs entered into a rental agreement with the defendants for three photocopying machines.
  2. The agreement stipulated Sembawang Shopping Centre as the installation address.
  3. The plaintiffs were unable to install the FX 5100 machine at Sembawang Shopping Centre due to electrical issues and landlord restrictions.
  4. The machine was delivered to another location at Boon Lay.
  5. The plaintiffs defaulted on rental payments.
  6. The plaintiffs alleged the FX 5100 was not fit for purpose.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Teo Chin Leong Thomson and Another v Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd, Suit 1652/1999, [2000] SGHC 123

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiffs' business relationship with the defendants began.
Madam Woo became a partner in Thomson Copy Service.
Plaintiffs decided to upgrade their photocopying machine.
Rental and full service agreement signed for XEROX 3060 PLAN PRINTER.
Rental agreement and full service agreement signed for A 935 COLOUR COPIER and XEROX 5100 COPIER.
Plaintiffs defaulted in the payment of rents.
Madam Woo admitted in a letter that they could not get permission to bring the machine into Sembawang Shopping Centre.
First plaintiff reported his departure from the partnership.
Plaintiffs filed action asserting breach of contract by the defendants.
Judgment delivered in favor of the defendants.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court held that the plaintiffs breached the contract.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Fitness for Purpose
    • Outcome: The court found that the FX 5100 was fit for the purpose it was purchased.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Business Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Photocopying machines
  • Rental agreement
  • Breach of contract
  • Fitness for purpose
  • Default
  • Sembawang Shopping Centre
  • FX 5100

15.2 Keywords

  • photocopier
  • rental agreement
  • breach of contract
  • Fuji Xerox
  • Thomson Copy Service

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Equipment Rental

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Commercial Law