Mark Lim

Mark Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and trademarks. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Lim has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inverse Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Scaffolding Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formwork System	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Lim has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Thyssen Hunnebeck v TTJ Civil Engineering: Discovery of Documents in Scaffolding Contract Dispute(Oct 2002) Fila Sport v Wadhwani: Pre-Action Discovery & Trademark Infringement(Feb 2002)
Tan Peng Chin LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management: Inverse Passing Off, Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy(Oct 2006) TCL Industries v ICC Chemical: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure(May 2006)
Wong & Leow	1 cases	17% of cases	Thyssen Hynnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd v TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd: Formwork Contract Dispute(Feb 2002)
Work & Leow LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	SMIT Land v Nacap: Dispute over Jurisdiction Clause in Rig Hire Contract(Sep 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management: Inverse Passing Off, Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy 16 Oct 2006 Earnson Management (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Oct 2006	Earnson Management (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs to the three defendants to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	TCL Industries v ICC Chemical: Breach of Contract & Force Majeure 29 May 2006 ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant)Lost	29 May 2006	ICC Chemical Corp (Defendant): Damages to be assessedDamages for late delivery and non-delivery to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Thyssen Hunnebeck v TTJ Civil Engineering: Discovery of Documents in Scaffolding Contract Dispute 20 Oct 2002 Thyssen Hunnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	20 Oct 2002	Thyssen Hunnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, and an order for discovery of documents relating to the scaffolding contract between the main contractor and the defendants was granted.
4	Fila Sport v Wadhwani: Pre-Action Discovery & Trademark Infringement 24 Feb 2002 Fila Sport S p A (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Feb 2002	Fila Sport S p A (Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartPlaintiffs' appeal allowed in part; limited discovery and interrogatories granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Thyssen Hynnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd v TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd: Formwork Contract Dispute 03 Feb 2002 Thyssen Hynnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Feb 2002	Thyssen Hynnebeck Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff regarding the formwork not returned by the defendant, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	SMIT Land v Nacap: Dispute over Jurisdiction Clause in Rig Hire Contract 12 Sep 2001 Nacap Drilling Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	12 Sep 2001	Nacap Drilling Sdn Bhd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the assistant registrar dismissing the defendants' application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed.