Mark Tan

Mark Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 56.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Tan has demonstrated expertise across 64 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sand Ban	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Net Tangible Asset	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Completion Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of opportunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Tan has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	33% of cases	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Discovery of Documents Dispute over Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(Nov 2010) Low Tuck Kwong v Sukamto Sia: Defamation, Malicious Falsehood & Coal Mining Arrangement Dispute(May 2010) Low Tuck Kwong v Sia Sukamto: Defamation Claim & Amendment of Defence(Jun 2009)
FC Legal Asia LLC	2 cases	22% of cases	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Mareva Injunction Quantum Dispute(May 2023) Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration(Feb 2023)
Rajah & Tann	2 cases	22% of cases	Leow Tiak Cheow v Pan-United Industries: Breach of Warranty in Share Sale Agreement(Oct 2002) Irawan Darsono v Ong Soon Kiat: Enforceability of Illegal Share Purchase Agreement under Securities Industry Act(Jun 2002)
Focus Law Asia LLC	1 cases	11% of cases	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction(Oct 2023)
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	11% of cases	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Continental Chemical: Adjournment of Winding Up Proceedings for Scheme of Arrangement(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	11%
Won	53.2 parties avg	3.2	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(33%)	33%
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	5(56%)	56%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,000.00	2,250.004 cases	4
USD	2,500,000.00	2,500,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ILC Co v Saitama Hiroshi: Dismissal of Contempt Application for Breach of Mareva Injunction 03 Oct 2023 Oshima Yumiko (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2023	Oshima Yumiko (Respondent): Application DismissedCommittal application against the 3rd and 4th respondents was dismissed. Costs in the sum of $4,000 each, plus reasonable disbursements, were awarded to the 3rd and 4th defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Mareva Injunction Quantum Dispute 25 May 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Partial	25 May 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Mareva injunction granted for a reduced quantumMareva injunction granted for US$2.5 million instead of the US$5 million sought.
3	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 27 Feb 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Lost	27 Feb 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Case management stay grantedCase management stay of the action was granted pending the resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
4	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Discovery of Documents Dispute over Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply 14 Nov 2010 Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	14 Nov 2010	Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $1,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Low Tuck Kwong v Sukamto Sia: Defamation, Malicious Falsehood & Coal Mining Arrangement Dispute 24 May 2010 Sukamto Sia (Defendant, Appellant)Won	24 May 2010	Sukamto Sia (Defendant, Appellant): Counterclaim Allowed to ProceedThe defendant's counterclaim was allowed to proceed to trial.
6	Raiffeisen Zentralbank v Continental Chemical: Adjournment of Winding Up Proceedings for Scheme of Arrangement 07 Mar 2010 Continental Chemical Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2010	Continental Chemical Corp Pte Ltd (Respondent): Adjournment GrantedThe court granted the company's application for a five-month adjournment of the winding up proceedings.
7	Low Tuck Kwong v Sia Sukamto: Defamation Claim & Amendment of Defence 23 Jun 2009 Sia Sukamto (Defendant, Respondent)Won	23 Jun 2009	Sia Sukamto (Defendant, Respondent): Leave to Amend Defence GrantedLeave to amend the Defence to include defences of justification and qualified privilege under Singapore law was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Leow Tiak Cheow v Pan-United Industries: Breach of Warranty in Share Sale Agreement 27 Oct 2002 Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2002	Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Irawan Darsono v Ong Soon Kiat: Enforceability of Illegal Share Purchase Agreement under Securities Industry Act 25 Jun 2002 Ong Soon Kiat (Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2002	Ong Soon Kiat (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiffs' action was dismissed with costs.