Leow Tiak Cheow v Pan-United Industries: Breach of Warranty in Share Sale Agreement

In Leow Tiak Cheow & Another v Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore addressed a dispute arising from a Share Sale Agreement (SSA) where Leow Tiak Cheow and Leow Tiak Chuan (Plaintiffs) sued Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant) for breach of warranty concerning the net tangible asset (NTA) value of Nam Kee Asphalt Pte Ltd. The court, presided over by Judicial Commissioner Woo Bih Li, found that the plaintiffs had breached the NTA warranty but ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiffs $38,808.95 after setting off the shortfall against the Retention Sum. The defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the Plaintiffs for part of their claim

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Share sale agreement dispute over breach of net tangible asset warranty. Court found a breach but ordered Pan-United to pay the plaintiffs $38,808.95.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Leow Tiak CheowPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffPartialJeffrey Beh Eng Siew, Leow Tiat Hong
Leow Tiak ChuanPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffPartialJeffrey Beh Eng Siew, Leow Tiat Hong
Pan-United Industries Pte LtdDefendantCorporationCounterclaim DismissedLostFrancis Xavier, Mark Tan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Jeffrey Beh Eng SiewLee Bon Leong & Co
Leow Tiat HongT H Leow & Co
Francis XavierRajah & Tann
Mark TanRajah & Tann

4. Facts

  1. Leow Tiak Cheow was the beneficial shareholder of Nam Kee Asphalt Pte Ltd.
  2. Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd was interested in buying all the issued shares in Nam Kee.
  3. A Share Sale Agreement (SSA) was entered into between the parties on 8 January 2001.
  4. Clause 8.4.1 of the SSA contained a warranty regarding the net tangible asset (NTA) value of Nam Kee.
  5. The Completion Accounts showed an NTA value of Nam Kee to be $2,038,808.95.
  6. The plaintiffs asserted that there should be a revaluation of Nam Kee’s leasehold land.
  7. The defendant claimed a breach of the NTA warranty due to the shortfall in NTA value.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Leow Tiak Cheow & Another v Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd, Suit No 1568 of 2001, [2002] SGHC 250

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Memorandum of Understanding dated
Sale and Purchase of Assets Agreement dated
Valuation of the Property done by Wong Kum Sek
Share Sale Agreement dated
Contractual Completion Date
Actual completion date
Completion Accounts provided by Irving Tan
Meeting held at Rajah & Tann’s office
Revised set of Completion Accounts forwarded with a cover letter
Valuation report by Richard Ellis
Rajah & Tann wrote to Irving Tan
Judgment Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiffs breached the net tangible asset warranty in the share sale agreement.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Breach of warranty
      • Interpretation of contractual terms
  2. Contractual Interpretation
    • Outcome: The court interpreted the share sale agreement as not requiring a revaluation of the property for the completion accounts.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of net tangible asset clause
      • Obligation to revalue property

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Payment of Retention Sum
  2. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd v Estate of Seow Khoon SengCourt of AppealYes[1997] 3 SLR 761SingaporeDistinguished from the present case regarding the interpretation of clauses related to net tangible asset valuation and the necessity of revaluation of assets.
Lim Bio Hiong Roger v City Developments LtdN/AYes[2000] 1 SLR 289SingaporeCited regarding the treatment of eaves area as part of the floor area for valuation purposes, but found not applicable to the present case.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Net Tangible Asset (NTA)
  • Share Sale Agreement (SSA)
  • Completion Accounts
  • Retention Sum
  • Revaluation
  • Warranty

15.2 Keywords

  • Share Sale Agreement
  • Net Tangible Asset
  • Breach of Warranty
  • Singapore High Court
  • Contract Law
  • Pan-United Industries
  • Leow Tiak Cheow
  • Nam Kee Asphalt

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Share Valuation

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Share Sale Agreement
  • Accounting Standards