Mark Yeo

Mark Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigating factors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Clang of the prison gates principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Law Corporations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Yeo has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Tongbao v Woon: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation in Joint Venture for Vessel Construction(Jul 2018) Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition(Dec 2015) Intergraph v Zhang: Employee Insurance Benefits & Trust Law(Nov 2004)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	14% of cases	Leong Sow Hon v Public Prosecutor: Building Control Act Violation for Viaduct Structural Design Failure(Oct 2020)
A C Fergusson Law Corporation	1 cases	14% of cases	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes(Jun 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	57%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,800,000.00	1,200,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Leong Sow Hon v Public Prosecutor: Building Control Act Violation for Viaduct Structural Design Failure 28 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against the six months’ imprisonment sentence.
2	Tongbao v Woon: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation in Joint Venture for Vessel Construction 22 Jul 2018 Thia Kok Wah (Defendant)Lost	22 Jul 2018	Thia Kok Wah (Defendant): Claim AllowedEquitable compensation awarded in the amount of US$4,800,000 (converted to SGD at the prevailing exchange rate, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition 15 Dec 2015 Mirador Building Contractor Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 Dec 2015	Mirador Building Contractor Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application to set aside orders refusedThe court refused the application to set aside the orders for meetings to be held under s 210(1) of the Companies Act.
4	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes 23 Jun 2014 Chan Yuen Lan (Appellant)Partial	23 Jun 2014	Chan Yuen Lan (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partMdm Chan holds only 15.83% of the beneficial interest in the Property, as opposed to the whole of the beneficial interest, on a resulting trust for Mr See. Mdm Chan is entitled to 15% of her costs in this appeal. The parties are to bear their own costs of the hearing below. The usual consequential orders shall apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Intergraph v Zhang: Employee Insurance Benefits & Trust Law 09 Nov 2004 Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	09 Nov 2004	Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, except for the insurance money received under the Hospital Policy. Intergraph was entitled to the insurance money from the Life Policy and the Accident Policy. No order was made on Intergraph’s counterclaim. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Zhang Yiguang v Intergraph Systems: Employee Insurance Benefits & Employer Deductions Dispute 10 Jun 2004 Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Jun 2004	Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Engelin Teh Practice LLC v Wee Soon Kim Anthony: Enforceability of Costs Agreement After Law Firm Dissolution 11 Jan 2004 Engelin Teh Practice LLC (Applicant)Lost	11 Jan 2004	Engelin Teh Practice LLC (Applicant): Summons dismissedThe court dismissed the summons because ETP was not a party to the original costs agreement.