Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition

In Re Punj Lloyd Pte Ltd and another matter, the High Court of Singapore addressed arguments by creditors to set aside orders for meetings to consider proposed schemes of arrangement for Punj Lloyd Private Limited (PLPL) and Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (SEC). The creditors raised concerns about certain transactions and disclosures. Aedit Abdullah JC declined to set aside the orders, finding no material non-disclosure or abuse of process, but emphasized the importance of fair creditor classification.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Setting aside refused

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Creditors challenged orders for scheme of arrangement meetings for Punj Lloyd Pte Ltd and Sembawang Engineers. The court refused to set aside the orders.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Punj Lloyd Pte LtdApplicantCorporationOrders for meetings to be held not set asideNeutralPatrick Ang, Low Poh Ling, Chew Xiang, Ng Kexian
Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte LtdApplicantCorporationOrders for meetings to be held not set asideNeutralPatrick Ang, Low Poh Ling, Chew Xiang, Ng Kexian
Mirador Building Contractor Pte LtdRespondentCorporationApplication to set aside orders refusedLostMark Yeo, Jessie Huen
SLE Power Engineering Pte LtdRespondentCorporationApplication to set aside orders refusedLostJohn Lim, Eric Ng

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJCYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Patrick AngRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Low Poh LingRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Chew XiangRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Ng KexianRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Mark YeoEngelin Teh Practice LLC
Jessie HuenEngelin Teh Practice LLC
John LimMalkin & Maxwell LLP
Eric NgMalkin & Maxwell LLP

4. Facts

  1. PLPL and SEC sought orders for meetings to consider schemes of arrangement.
  2. Creditors applied to set aside the orders, alleging non-disclosure and improper transactions.
  3. SEC is a subsidiary of PLPL, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PLL.
  4. PLPL owed SEC S$91.8m.
  5. PLL redeemed preference shares held by PLL for $50m in December 2014.
  6. A transaction involved a Malaysian subsidiary of PLPL, Punj Lloyd Oil & Gas Malaysia (PLOG).
  7. The meetings ordered under s 210(1) were to be held in mid-January 2016.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Punj Lloyd Pte Ltd, HC/Originating Summons No 857 of 2015, [2015] SGHC 321

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Orders granted for meetings to be held
Hearing on application to set aside order
Decision date
Meetings ordered under s 210(1) were to be held in mid-January 2016

7. Legal Issues

  1. Setting Aside of Orders for Scheme of Arrangement Meetings
    • Outcome: The court refused to set aside the orders, finding no material non-disclosure or abuse of process.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Material Non-Disclosure
      • Abuse of Process
      • Fairness of Creditor Classification
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 2 SLR 213
      • [2005] SGHC 112
  2. Duty of Disclosure in Scheme of Arrangement Applications
    • Outcome: The court found that there was no material non-disclosure that indicated impropriety.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Materiality of Non-Disclosure
      • Impact on Creditor Classification
      • Potential Abuse of Process
    • Related Cases:
      • [2005] SGHC 112
  3. Fairness of Creditor Classification
    • Outcome: The court emphasized the importance of fair creditor classification and accepted the applicant's concession to have SEC in a separate class.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Domination by a Single Creditor
      • Separate Class for Related Creditors
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 2 SLR 213

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside of orders for scheme of arrangement meetings

9. Cause of Actions

  • Application to set aside orders for scheme of arrangement meetings

10. Practice Areas

  • Restructuring
  • Corporate Law

11. Industries

  • Engineering
  • Construction
  • Energy
  • Infrastructure

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Re Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 250SingaporeCited for rejecting opposition by one creditor of SEC.
The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd and another AppealCourt of AppealYes[2012] 2 SLR 213SingaporeCited for the approach to be taken in s 210(1) applications.
Re Ng Huat Foundations Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] SGHC 112SingaporeCited for the principle that the Court should not grant an application if there is no realistic prospect of approval.
Re Halley’s Departmental Store Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1996] 1 SLR(R) 81SingaporeCited for the principle that transactions not beneficial to creditors are relevant matters to be considered.
Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd v Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2003] 3 SLR(R) 629SingaporeCited for the obligation to provide adequate information.
United Overseas Bank Ltd v Ng Huat Foundations Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] 2 SLR(R) 425SingaporeCited for material non-disclosure going to the likelihood of viability of the scheme.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Reliance National Asia Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 121SingaporeCited to show that s 210 applies not just to creditors, but also members, and could conceivably operate in respect of wholly solvent companies.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Scheme of Arrangement
  • Creditors
  • Non-Disclosure
  • Abuse of Process
  • Creditor Classification
  • Insolvency
  • Restructuring

15.2 Keywords

  • scheme of arrangement
  • creditors
  • insolvency
  • restructuring
  • Punj Lloyd
  • Sembawang Engineers

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency
  • Corporate Restructuring
  • Schemes of Arrangement

17. Areas of Law

  • Insolvency Law
  • Company Law
  • Schemes of Arrangement